On 1/19/24 00:55, David Christensen wrote:
On 1/18/24 15:10, gene heskett wrote:
On 1/18/24 16:08, David Christensen wrote:
On 1/18/24 03:47, gene heskett wrote:
I have issued a smartctl -tlong on all 4 drives, results in about 3
hours.
A SMART long test should find and fix any read
On 19/01/2024 16:10, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
why doesn't grep count 2 commas
echo 'Kích thước máy xay cỏ, giá máy thế nào , phụ tùng máy mua ở đâu' | grep
-c ,
1
echo 'Kích thước máy xay cỏ, giá máy thế nào , phụ tùng máy mua ở đâu' | cut
-d, -f1
Kích thước máy xay cỏ
echo 'Kích
why doesn't grep count 2 commas
echo 'Kích thước máy xay cỏ, giá máy thế nào , phụ tùng máy mua ở đâu' | grep
-c ,
1
echo 'Kích thước máy xay cỏ, giá máy thế nào , phụ tùng máy mua ở đâu' | cut
-d, -f1
Kích thước máy xay cỏ
echo 'Kích thước máy xay cỏ, giá máy thế nào , phụ tùng máy mua ở
On 2024-01-18, Andy Smith wrote:
> Could check the man page then like I said.
>
> Some options require rsync to know the full file list, so these
> options disable the incremental recursion mode. These include:
> --delete-before, --delete-after, --prune-empty-dirs, and
>
On 1/18/24 21:56, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
I had a1T drive that has my backup on it. I used Lucky Backup but I
cannot figure out how to restore. I read the book and it is confusing.
I can't just more them over from that HD to the one that is in the
computer because they are locked. I will be
up. Drag them the other way to
restore. It helps to create folders with year, month, day-of-month
names (e.g. 20240118) on the USB drive, so that you can back up the
same file repeatedly and retain older copies. Then put the USB drive
off-site, get another USB drive, and continue with backups. Ev
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:40:01 +0100, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 05:38:37AM -, David Chmelik wrote:
>> Couldn't Debian standardize uid:gid numbers for daemons?
>[...] * Every obscure, niche package's users and groups would have to be
>added to every Debian system. I
On 1/18/24 15:10, gene heskett wrote:
On 1/18/24 16:08, David Christensen wrote:
On 1/18/24 03:47, gene heskett wrote:
I have issued a smartctl -tlong on all 4 drives, results in about 3
hours.
A SMART long test should find and fix any read errors.
Which has now been done on all 4 SSD. but
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 08:06:24PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
[...]
> I have it in ~/.fvwm2rc as:
>
> *FvwmButtons xterm_ts5 linuxterm.xpm Exec xterm -ls -geometry 80x24 -bg wheat
> -fg black -sl 1 +sb
>
> This causes a button in the button box which creates a new xterm when
> clicked.
nth, day-of-month
names (e.g. 20240118) on the USB drive, so that you can back up the same
file repeatedly and retain older copies. Then put the USB drive
off-site, get another USB drive, and continue with backups. Every month
or so, swap the on-site and off-site USB drives.
2. If your compu
Hello
I recently bought a small UPS by Eaton in order to prevent my
btrfs-fileserver (running Debian 12 Bookworm, which is also the source
of my nut-installation) from shutting down abruptly while writing
something important during a power loss. I have found very good
documentation on how to set
I answered all your questions. I believe I am using wayland. I
appreciate your help.;
On 1/18/24 1:12 AM, David Christensen wrote:
On 1/17/24 17:40, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
Well I did a back-up, that didn't work, but I didn't know it at the
time,
The back up failed? :-(
Do you need
On Thu 11 Jan 2024 at 16:41:36 (+0100), Hans wrote:
> I am running Debian/stable with Libreoffice 7.4.7.2. (ok, this is not the
> problem :) )
>
> But: When I start Libreoffice, then the logo appears, the progress bar is
> showing about 25 percent, then hangs for about 1 Minute. After it
I am sorry for the way I said that. What I want is the very top bar,
before I re-installed it had three topics on the very top left hand that
allowed me to click on one of them and get a menu of all the software
installed and in order according to the topic. Like under internet
would list
On Thu 18 Jan 2024 at 00:57:07 (-0800), David Christensen wrote:
> On 1/17/24 22:44, gene heskett wrote:
> > One thing that bothers me is there is no way the installers parted
> > shows partition names for non-raid disks. To me that is a serious
> > bug. It appears from the help that it can LABEL
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 21:44 +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:01:46PM +0100, Michel Verdier wrote:
> > On 2024-01-18, Andy Smith wrote:
> > > If you use --delete-after (and some other options) then rsync has
> > > to
> > > check every file before it can do any work,
On 19/01/2024 04:08, Charles Curley wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:02:44 +0700
Max Nikulin wrote:
Have you faced real issues namely with hardware acceleration?
Other than this, not that I know of.
I do not think the message concerning iHD is related to any real issue.
I see "oops" in the
On Thu 18 Jan 2024 at 12:28:58 (+0100), hw wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-01-17 at 23:08 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 16 Jan 2024 at 11:47:53 (+0100), hw wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 20:32 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 08:08:36PM +0100, hw wrote:
> > > > >
>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:39:21 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> On upgrading from bullseye to bookwork, my netatalk installation has
> been nuked. The bullseye package (3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1) is still
> present but no daemon is running nor is my Mac making backups to the
> server.
>
> Is there a known
On 1/18/24 16:08, David Christensen wrote:
On 1/18/24 03:47, gene heskett wrote:
On 1/18/24 03:57, David Christensen wrote:
The old /home RAID10 still has its metadata on disk. I would install
the "mdadm" package, edit /etc/fstab, copy and rework the old /home
line (new mount point, add
The following sources.list which I copied from
wiki.debian.org/SourcesList works perfectly for me
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main non-free-firmware
contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main non-free-firmware
contrib non-free
deb
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:01:46PM +0100, Michel Verdier wrote:
> On 2024-01-18, Andy Smith wrote:
> > If you use --delete-after (and some other options) then rsync has to
> > check every file before it can do any work, whereas normally it will
> > find a few files to work on and start
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:02:44 +0700
Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 14/01/2024 00:19, Charles Curley wrote:
> [...]
>
> [...]
>
> Have you faced real issues namely with hardware acceleration?
Other than this, not that I know of.
>
> iHD driver is tied first, but your graphics card is too old
On 1/18/24 03:47, gene heskett wrote:
On 1/18/24 03:57, David Christensen wrote:
The old /home RAID10 still has its metadata on disk. I would install
the "mdadm" package, edit /etc/fstab, copy and rework the old /home
line (new mount point, add option "ro"), create the mount point, and
On 2024-01-18, Andy Smith wrote:
> If you use --delete-after (and some other options) then rsync has to
> check every file before it can do any work, whereas normally it will
> find a few files to work on and start work, meanwhile incrementally
> scanning for more.
Not sure of that. rsync always
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024, 9:15 AM Stefan Monnier
wrote:
> > I haven't tried it but I would assume that if the user exists then the
> > package uses that. So cresting a template /etc/passwd before
> > installing packages would fix this.
>
> That works, indeed. Maybe Someone™ should develop a small
Thanks Thomas.
Have a good one ...
John
Thomas Schmitt writes:
> Hi,
>
> i wrote:
> > > *FvwmButtons xterm_ts5 linuxterm.xpm Exec xterm -ls -geometry 80x24 -bg
> > > wheat -fg black -sl 1 +sb
>
> John Conover wrote:
> >
> >
I will help as well.
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 5:22 PM Atenágoras Silva
wrote:
> I'd like to help, too.
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Atenágoras
>
> Em qui., 18 de jan. de 2024 às 13:01, Yuri Musachio <
> yuri.musac...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Christian, hi!
>>
>> I will do.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Hi,
i wrote:
> > *FvwmButtons xterm_ts5 linuxterm.xpm Exec xterm -ls -geometry 80x24 -bg
> > wheat -fg black -sl 1 +sb
John Conover wrote:
>
>Action 'Exec exec xterm ...'
The framework of this line probably
Thomas Schmitt writes:
> Hi,
>
> i wrote:
> > >xterm -ls -geometry 80x24 -bg wheat -fg black -sl 1 +sb &
>
> Max Nikulin wrote:
> > Options may be put into ~/.Xresources
> > xterm*vt100.saveLines: 1
> > xterm*VT100.background: wheat
> > xterm*VT100.foreground: black
>
> I have it in
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:59:48AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Host gives me the same result. However, apt says:
>
> 0% [Connecting to security-debian.org (57.128.81.193)]
security-debian.org and security.debian.org are different names.
Hi,
i wrote:
> >xterm -ls -geometry 80x24 -bg wheat -fg black -sl 1 +sb &
Max Nikulin wrote:
> Options may be put into ~/.Xresources
> xterm*vt100.saveLines: 1
> xterm*VT100.background: wheat
> xterm*VT100.foreground: black
I have it in ~/.fvwm2rc as:
*FvwmButtons xterm_ts5
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 18:51 +, Tixy wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 18:16 +, Tixy wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 12:06 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > > > > > Tixy writes:
> > > > > > > > Where could your machine be getting this IP address from? It's
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > >
I'd like to help, too.
Sincerely yours,
Atenágoras
Em qui., 18 de jan. de 2024 às 13:01, Yuri Musachio
escreveu:
> Christian, hi!
>
> I will do.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> On Jan 18 2024, at 8:37 am, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am upstream maintainer of "Back In Time" [1] [2] a
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 18:16 +, Tixy wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 12:06 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > Tixy writes:
> > > Where could your machine be getting this IP address from? It's the
> > > same IP address shown in your output when you used the incorrect
> > > address
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 12:06 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Tixy writes:
> > Where could your machine be getting this IP address from? It's the
> > same IP address shown in your output when you used the incorrect
> > address 'ftp.security.debian.org' and for me that doesn't resolve to
> > any IP
Tixy writes:
> Where could your machine be getting this IP address from? It's the
> same IP address shown in your output when you used the incorrect
> address 'ftp.security.debian.org' and for me that doesn't resolve to
> any IP address.
>From here both security.debian.org and
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 10:48 -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> On 1/17/24 20:52, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 08:40:58PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> > > deb http://ftp.security-debian.org/debian-security/ bookworm-security main
> > > non-free non-free-firmware
> > Stop guessing,
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I haven't tried it but I would assume that if the user exists then the
> > package uses that. So cresting a template /etc/passwd before
> > installing packages would fix this.
>
> That works, indeed. Maybe Someone™ should develop a small "UGID server"
> which
On 14/01/2024 00:19, Charles Curley wrote:
charles@jhegaala:~$ chromium &
[2] 33609
charles@jhegaala:~$ libva error:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/iHD_drv_video.so init failed
charles@jhegaala:~$ vainfo
libva info: VA-API version 1.17.0
libva info: Trying to open
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:28:30AM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> Sounds like this group has finally achieved a long overdue consensus. How
> many times since LVM was ready for root/boot volumes have I been told that
> using partitions was necessary good practice. Even had that in job
>
Host gives me the same result. However, apt says:
0% [Connecting to security-debian.org (57.128.81.193)]
and times out.
Using "nameserver 8.8.8.8" changes nothing.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 17/01/2024 15:28, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:31:40PM +, Jeff Jennings wrote:
Recently, I decided to download Debian 12.4 and was alarmed to notice
that Debian 12 downloads are no longer through https connections.
[...]
That's served via https from
Thomas George wrote:
> I typed the above line exactly. apt-get update searches for
> security.debian.org:80 [57.128.81.193] and times out, no connection
Gene writes:
> And that is not the address I get from here
It's the one I get from here, and it times out. My DNS is working.
--
John Hasler
New sources.list file works perfectly
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main non-free-firmware
contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main non-free-firmware
contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm-updates main
non-free-firmware contrib
On 1/17/24 22:54, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 08:40:58PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
deb http://ftp.security-debian.org/debian-security/ bookworm-security main
non-free non-free-firmware
Stop guessing, and *read* what you were told to use.
On 2024-01-17, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Curt wrote:
>> I discovered a couple of discussions of the phenomenon, the upshot of which
>> were:
>> 1) That's what you get when you purchase cheap SSDs.
>>
On 18/01/2024 04:20, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
I normally start new xterms by
xterm -ls -geometry 80x24 -bg wheat -fg black -sl 1 +sb &
Options may be put into ~/.Xresources
xterm*vt100.saveLines: 1
xterm*VT100.background: wheat
xterm*VT100.foreground: black
! etc
Use xrdb to merge
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024, 9:35 PM gene heskett wrote:
> On 1/17/24 19:54, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Andy Smith wrote:
> ...
> >> Then there will just be people going by taste.
> >>
> >> Personally I still put them directly on drives. If I ever get taken
> >> out by one of those crappy
Christian, hi!
I will do.
Best,
On Jan 18 2024, at 8:37 am, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am upstream maintainer of "Back In Time" [1] [2] a GUI backup tool
> using rsync in the back.
>
> I would like to kindly ask if someone want to contribute to the
> Portuguese translation of that
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:59:34AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> And that is not the address I get from here
> ping -c1 security.debian.org
> PING security.debian.org (151.101.2.132) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 151.101.2.132 (151.101.2.132): icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=15.8 ms
>
> Your dns
Hey Andy.
Andy Smith wrote:
>
>On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:53:43AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I'm clearly a member of a third group of people,,, :-)
>
>Oh, I didn't mean to imply that those going by taste were in a
>minority! Taste, or possibly, "just never thought about it" could
>well be
On 1/18/24 10:49, Thomas George wrote:
On 1/17/24 20:52, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 08:40:58PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
deb http://ftp.security-debian.org/debian-security/ bookworm-security
main
non-free non-free-firmware
Stop guessing, and *read* what you were told to
On 1/18/24 10:49, Thomas George wrote:
On 1/17/24 20:52, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 08:40:58PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
deb http://ftp.security-debian.org/debian-security/ bookworm-security
main
non-free non-free-firmware
Stop guessing, and *read* what you were told to
On 1/17/24 20:52, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 08:40:58PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
deb http://ftp.security-debian.org/debian-security/ bookworm-security main
non-free non-free-firmware
Stop guessing, and *read* what you were told to use.
On 1/17/24 20:40, Thomas George wrote:
On 1/17/24 19:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:31:52AM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 12.2.0 _Bookworm_ - Official amd64 DVD
Binary-1 with firmware 20231007-10:29]/ bookworm main non-free-firmware
This
> I haven't tried it but I would assume that if the user exists then the
> package uses that. So cresting a template /etc/passwd before
> installing packages would fix this.
That works, indeed. Maybe Someone™ should develop a small "UGID server"
which integrates into Debian's `adduser/addgroup`
> I agree this is annoying, and hardish to fix once servers are deployed.
FWIW, I have "fixed" such things after the fact without too much
trouble by editing the /etc/{passwd,group,...} files and do a recursive
`chown`. I'm sure it can result in a broken system depending on the
details, tho.
>> > However, I have read that using rsync --delete instead of rsync --
>> > delete-after is faster and uses less memory, and so is more efficient.
>> I'd be surprised if it makes a significant difference.
> If you use --delete-after (and some other options) then rsync has to
> check every file
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 14:16 +0100, Ralph Aichinger wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 12:51 +, Tixy wrote:
> >
> > I have the same options in the forward chain except that I haven't
> > qualified them with an interface name. Didn't occur to me that I
> > would
> > need to do that as there are
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:09:35PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > However, I have read that using rsync --delete instead of rsync --
> > delete-after is faster and uses less memory, and so is more efficient.
>
> I'd be surprised if it makes a significant difference.
If you use
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 06:23:28AM +, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2024, David Chmelik wrote:
>
> > Couldn't Debian standardize uid:gid numbers for daemons?
[…]
> I haven't tried it but I would assume that if the user exists then the
> package uses that.
Correct.
So for our
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 13:09 +, Michael Kjörling wrote:
>
> Definitely agree that a solid backup regimen (including regular
> automated backups; at least one off-site copy _at least_ of critical,
> hot data; and planning for the contingency that you need to restore
> that backup onto a brand
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 07:14 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:28:58PM +0100, hw wrote:
> > Ok, and what's the problem? That the server wants to print to the
> > printer? That the application sends data to the "screen" (a terminal
> > emulator) instead of sending it to the
Hello,
I am upstream maintainer of "Back In Time" [1] [2] a GUI backup tool
using rsync in the back.
I would like to kindly ask if someone want to contribute to the Swedish
translation of that application. The current state of translation is
47%.
We offer a web-based front-end on our
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:53:43AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'm clearly a member of a third group of people,,, :-)
Oh, I didn't mean to imply that those going by taste were in a
minority! Taste, or possibly, "just never thought about it" could
well be the biggest group. I was only
El jue, 18 ene 2024 a las 8:32, Jude_xiomi Sago
() escribió:
>
> El 2024-01-17 a las 14:44 -0500, Jude_xiomi Sago escribió:
>
> > Buenas tardes y Feliz año.
>
> Igualmente :-)
>
> > Tengo un problemilla que me impide actualizarme a la versión 12 de debian.
> > Se trata de poco espacio para la
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 12:51 +, Tixy wrote:
>
> I have the same options in the forward chain except that I haven't
> qualified them with an interface name. Didn't occur to me that I
> would
> need to do that as there are only two networks my LAN and 'the
> internet'.
You probably don't need
Hello,
I am upstream maintainer of "Back In Time" [1] [2] a GUI backup tool
using rsync in the back.
I would like to kindly ask if someone want to contribute to the Dutch
translation of that application. The current state of translation is
92%.
We offer a web-based front-end on our
Hello,
I am upstream maintainer of "Back In Time" [1] [2] a GUI backup tool
using rsync in the back.
I would like to kindly ask if someone want to contribute to the Catalan
translation of that application. The current state of translation is
92%.
We offer a web-based front-end on our
On 18 Jan 2024 13:26 +0100, from r...@h5.or.at (Ralph Aichinger):
> As a home/SOHO user, I'd rather have a working backup every few hours
> or every day than some RAID10 wonder
Definitely agree that a solid backup regimen (including regular
automated backups; at least one off-site copy _at least_
On 2024-01-17, Default User wrote:
> BTW(2), I do use rsnapshot with cron jobs to back up the internal SSD
> to the primary backup drive daily (and weekly, monthly, yearly). But I
> am not sure if I could also use it to do copies of the primary backup
> drive to the secondary backup drive (maybe
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 12:31 +0100, Ralph Aichinger wrote:
[...]
> So it seems clamping the mss on the NAT/PPPoE-Machine running Debian no
> longer works. For this I use/used the follwing rules:
>
> iifname "ppp0" tcp flags syn tcp option maxseg size set rt mtu;
> oifname "ppp0" tcp flags syn tcp
Hello fellow Debian users,
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 12:18 +0100, hw wrote:
> Always use an UPS.
Here I have a somewhat contrarian view, I hope not to offend too much:
For countries with stable electricity supplies (like Austria where I
live) having a small UPS might actually lead to more
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 05:38:37AM -, David Chmelik wrote:
> Couldn't Debian standardize uid:gid numbers for daemons?
The thing is, Debian has tens of thousands of packages, and any one
of these packages is capable of creating new UIDs and/or GIDs if it
feels like doing so. There is no
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:28:58PM +0100, hw wrote:
> Ok, and what's the problem? That the server wants to print to the
> printer? That the application sends data to the "screen" (a terminal
> emulator) instead of sending it to the printer? That it is necessary
> to see the printer data
On 1/18/24 03:57, David Christensen wrote:
On 1/17/24 22:44, gene heskett wrote:>> On 1/18/24 00:50, David
Christensen wrote:
The migration took two passes because udev can't make up its alleged
mind so I was finally forced to use the rescue mode to edit fstab to
mount it by UUID and that
Hello everybody, related question to what I asked a few days ago:
Since I touched my /etc/nftables.conf rules a few days ago to enable
IPv6 I've got IPv6 working completely (thanks again for your help with
suggesting logging packets), but I seemingly broke mss clamping for
IPv4 in doing so (or
On 18 Jan 2024 12:15 +0100, from to...@tuxteam.de:
>> **That "primary backup drive" is not a backup at all.**
>
> It is: against the situation you fat-finger something and react
> before the next backup happens (this is a threat worth being taken
> into account). For that case, a backup with more
Hello,
I am upstream maintainer of "Back In Time" [1] [2] a GUI backup tool
using rsync in the back.
I would like to kindly ask if someone want to contribute to the
Portuguese translation of that application. The current state of
translation is 23%.
We offer a web-based front-end on our
On Wed, 2024-01-17 at 23:08 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 16 Jan 2024 at 11:47:53 (+0100), hw wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 20:32 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 08:08:36PM +0100, hw wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't understand why you involve a terminal
On Wed, 2024-01-17 at 14:52 -0500, Default User wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-01-17 at 10:29 -0800, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 17 2024 at 11:19:39 AM, Default User
> > wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Opinions, please.
> > >
> > > I use rsync to copy my primary backup drive to a secondary
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:05:01AM +, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2024 20:23 -0500, from hunguponcont...@gmail.com (Default User):
[...]
> Hold on. Let's pause right here.
>
> **That "primary backup drive" is not a backup at all.**
It is: against the situation you fat-finger
On 17 Jan 2024 20:23 -0500, from hunguponcont...@gmail.com (Default User):
> BTW, the two backup drives are external 4 Gb USB HDDs. The secondary
> backup drive is always kept away from the computer, in a locked steel
> box, except when it is attached to the computer to have the primary
> backup
On 1/17/24 22:44, gene heskett wrote:>> On 1/18/24 00:50, David
Christensen wrote:
The migration took two passes because udev can't make up its alleged
mind so I was finally forced to use the rescue mode to edit fstab to
mount it by UUID and that worked, I've got /home on the copy right now.
Hi folks,
apparently the jessie archive repository is still alive, but if I try to
update the package list there is an error message
W: GPG error: http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not
86 matches
Mail list logo
