So, lots of reasons not to use Outlook. I'm curious, why do you
find it to be the
best available? What does it offer that, say, Netscape can't do
with a good IMAP
server?
Thanks for the reply !
The best part of Outlook is it's integration. It works with my Pilot, has a
PIM which is
Paul McHale wrote:
The best part of Outlook is it's integration. It works with my Pilot, has a
PIM which is descent.
Descent was a great game. Alas, it is no PIM.
Outlook has [sic] the best one stop application.
Thems fightin' words. Prepare for ample flame-age, dude.
Thursday, December 02, 1999, 2:03:33 PM, Adam wrote:
In one standard (I don't know which), = is a special character used for
end-of-line and otherwise as an escape character
MIME
But you're right, Outlook can be made to send in plain text, and your (Paul)
emails have been good about
Paul McHale writes:
So, lots of reasons not to use Outlook. I'm curious, why do you
find it to be the
best available? What does it offer that, say, Netscape can't do
with a good IMAP
server?
Thanks for the reply !
The best part of Outlook is it's integration. It
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Ironically, your lines are too long.
--
Peter Galbraith, research scientist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada
P.O. Box 1000, Mont-Joli Qc, G5H 3Z4 Canada. 418-775-0852 FAX: 775-0546
6623'rd
Wednesday, December 01, 1999, 11:45:56 PM, Paul wrote:
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
OK, pardon me for being a bit peeved but you and Daniel are both posting
with MS *CRAP* into a Linux forum, using HTML and quoting the completely wrong
way. Cut it out!!!
I mean,
Steve,
I agree that I am using MS Outlook. I think it is the best program
available for my use. I don't understand your difficulty. I forwarded the
message to my linux server and opened it with mutt. It came across in plain
text. I double checked the outlook transmit message settings and
Quoting Paul McHale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I agree that I am using MS Outlook. I think it is the best program
available for my use. I don't understand your difficulty. I forwarded the
message to my linux server and opened it with mutt. It came across in plain
text. I double checked the
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 05:11:37AM -0500, Paul McHale wrote:
I agree that I am using MS Outlook. I think it is the best program
available for my use. I don't understand your difficulty. I forwarded the
message to my linux server and opened it with mutt. It came across in plain
text. I
Paul McHale wrote:
Steve,
I agree that I am using MS Outlook. I think it is the best program available
for
my use. I don't understand your difficulty. I forwarded the message to my
linux
server and opened it with mutt. It came across in plain text. I double
checked
the outlook
I always heard that outlook was a piece of shit, based on mostly the fact
that it is so prone to virus spreading. Sure there may be ways
around this but the average user isn't going to know about them.
My first(and so far, only) bad experience with Outlook was after a server
upgrade(I saw
11 matches
Mail list logo
