On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome
replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone
indicates that they want you to cc: to their address, have some
manners--don't do it. especially,
Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome
replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone
indicates that they want you to cc: to their
On Saturday 09 February 2002 11:45 am, Brian Nelson wrote:
Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i
welcome replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all.
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, csj wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500
Jeremy Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary,
I also run Free Agent, though just for the newsgroups.
My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired
of them) and I have actually never had any problems with
it.
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
And wouldn't it be nice if none of us had to lock our
doors, put bars over our windows, or install burglar
alarms on our homes? In a perfect world...
I live in a rough part of Portland and I never lock the doors or the car
(and thanks to my roommate
On Friday 08 February 2002 06:33 am, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
And wouldn't it be nice if none of us had to lock our
doors, put bars over our windows, or install burglar
alarms on our homes? In a perfect world...
I live in a rough part of
Quoting ben [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 08 February 2002 06:33 am, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
And wouldn't it be nice if none of us had to lock our
doors, put bars over our windows, or install burglar
alarms on our homes? In a perfect
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 01:07:52 -0500 (EST)
Jeremy Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, csj wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500
Jeremy Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Wouldn't it be nicer if you didn't have to scan email? Email viruses
shouldn't exist in the first
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, ben wrote:
where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome
replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone
indicates that they want you to cc: to their address, have some
manners--don't do it. especially, now that you
On Friday 08 February 2002 04:07 pm, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, ben wrote:
where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome
replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone
indicates that they want you to cc: to their address,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 03:32:59AM +0800, csj wrote:
| On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500
| Jeremy Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Gary,
|
| I also run Free Agent, though just for the newsgroups.
| My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired
| of them) and I have actually
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500
Jeremy Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary,
I also run Free Agent, though just for the newsgroups.
My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired
of them) and I have actually never had any problems with
it. I do virus scanning on the mail
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 09:18:44 +0100, Chris Mueller wrote:
At 00:11 -0500 01.02.2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook,
...
For your own advantage
you should close Outlook - for ever.
And switch to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 4:19 pm, Gary Turner wrote:
May I suggest Forte' Agent for mail on a Win box? It is text based,
will let you inspect attachments/html in raw form, and will warn and
query you should you try to open an executable.
of attachments (.doc, .vbs, etc.) it isn't too much to
worry about.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Gary Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:20 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002
begin Jeremy Gaddis quotation:
My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired
of them) and I have actually never had any problems with
it.
Except for not being able to read messages like this one?
Craig
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:42:32PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
| begin Jeremy Gaddis quotation:
|
| My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired
| of them) and I have actually never had any problems with
| it.
|
| Except for not being able to read messages like this one?
Or the
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
You're a fucking arrogant bastard, you know that?
Being a recovering bob does that.
--
Baloo
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, dman wrote:
No he isn't. He's been a helpful member of this list for quite some
time.
Used to have the email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and my tech IDs were
4263G and 6918B, before and after the Beaverton office moved.
You can't claim that he didn't see what he saw. You did
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:46:47AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I'd love to be able to SSH out to my home box, but the company
I'm in have an MS Proxy server blocking the way and it won't let anything
out without authenticating using an NT account. :(
The funny thing is that it
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:46:47AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I'd love to be able to SSH out to my home box, but the company
I'm in have an MS Proxy server blocking the way and it won't let anything
out without authenticating using an NT account. :(
Have a look at httptunnel -
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
SSH over TCP/IP over HTTP (with at least one proxy involved) over TCP/IP
isn't going to be fast, but it may well be workable ...
I used to do this when some moron MCSE blocked close to all the ports,
severely limiting my ability to get my job done
At 14:09 -0800 31.01.2002, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why
are you using software by the antichrist?
Well - I never considered Apple as antichrist
;-)
I am mailing on a Mac.
It's easier, less time consuming - and safer:
- no
At 00:11 -0500 01.02.2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, SSH to the mail
server and read them using {elm|mutt|pine|other_mda}? Like
anything else, it comes down to what you like best and what
does
* Chris Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 03:20]:
[...]
For your own advantage you should close Outlook - for ever. And switch
to Eudora. Under Win oder Mac.
Or TheBat! (cheaper and more of a power users' Winblows MUA.)
--
Brian Clark | Debian GNU/Linux: 3950 packages to keep you
: Jeremy L. Gaddis
Subject: RE: W32/Myparty
At 00:11 -0500 01.02.2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, SSH to the mail
server and read them using {elm|mutt|pine|other_mda}? Like
anything else, it comes down
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
| On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote:
[snip]
| http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe
|
| Before this bob took a better job as a
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, csj wrote:
Maybe Passport will solve it for him.
And we all know how secure that is...
--
Baloo
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, SSH to the mail
server and read them using {elm|mutt|pine|other_mda}?
Preferrably for all your email.
the job better. On the same note, I run
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Chris Mueller wrote:
For your own advantage
you should close Outlook - for ever.
And switch to Eudora.
Under Win oder Mac.
Non-optimal. Adware doesn't even qualify as non-free in my book.
--
Baloo
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:16:09AM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
| I used to use Eudora as my main MUA, but I find that Outlook
| meets my needs better. Outlook isn't *just* an MUA, it also
| has a calendar, a task scheduler, a journal, etc. (all of which
| I use, actually). Since I'm going to use
begin Jeremy Gaddis quotation:
Viruses aren't a problem as I like to think I have a bit more
common sense than the average Outlook user.
I expect at least 90% of Outlook users think the same of themselves.
You might notice the
X-Scanner: header in my e-mail messages. All incoming and
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Craig Dickson wrote:
Viruses aren't a problem as I like to think I have a bit more
common sense than the average Outlook user.
I expect at least 90% of Outlook users think the same of themselves.
Having to do tech support on that godforsaken product has taught me that
You're a fucking arrogant bastard, you know that?
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:38 PM
To: Craig Dickson
Cc: debian-user list
Subject: Re: W32/Myparty
On Fri, 1 Feb
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:00:49PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
| On February 01, 2002 at 6:38 PM Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote :
| You're a fucking arrogant bastard, you know that?
No he isn't. He's been a helpful member of this list for quite some
time. You can't claim that he didn't see what
Chris Mueller wrote:
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
How many harmed your debian system ? 0 ? Ahh, the wonders of not being a
slave to bill...
:-(
Chris
--
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL
At 16:01 31/01/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Chris Mueller wrote:
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
How many harmed your debian system ? 0 ? Ahh, the wonders of not being a
slave to bill...
How many of us are reading this email on a
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote:
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why
are you using software by the antichrist?
--
Baloo
At 02:09 PM 1/31/02 -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote:
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why
are you using software by
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:09 pm, John Griffiths wrote:
At 02:09 PM 1/31/02 -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote:
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
This makes no sense to me. If
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote:
This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why
are you using software by the antichrist?
You might have heard of a little thing called work
http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe
Before this bob took a better
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
| On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote:
|
| This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why
| are you using software by the antichrist?
|
|
| You might have heard of a little thing called work
On Thursday 31 January 2002 08:00 am, Geoff Beaumont wrote:
At 16:01 31/01/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Chris Mueller wrote:
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
How many harmed your debian system ? 0 ? Ahh, the wonders of not being a
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:02, benfoley wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2002 08:00 am, Geoff Beaumont wrote:
At 16:01 31/01/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Chris Mueller wrote:
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
How many harmed
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote:
Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to concentrate
on security from now on...
Do you honestly believe it's more than the same bullshit lipservice as
before?
--
Baloo
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:15, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote:
Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to
concentrate on security from now on...
Do you honestly believe it's more than the same bullshit lipservice as
before?
No,
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
| On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote:
[snip]
| http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe
|
| Before this bob took a better job as a security
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 05:46:12PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
| On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
| | On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote:
| [snip]
| |
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote:
Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to concentrate
on security from now on...
Do you honestly believe it's more than the same bullshit
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:34:25AM +0800, csj wrote:
| On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:15:34 -0800 (PST)
| Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote:
|
| Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to
| concentrate on security from now
all:
see http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/01/09/10/010910oplivingston.xml
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:30, dman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:34:25AM +0800, csj wrote:
| On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:15:34 -0800 (PST)
|
| Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Thu, 31
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:20:43 -0500 dman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 05:46:12PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
| On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
| | On Fri, 1 Feb 2002,
]
-Original Message-
From: allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:37 PM
To: Debian User Mailing List
Subject: Re: W32/Myparty
all:
see
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/01/09/10/010910oplivingston.xml
On Thursday 31 January 2002
, 2002 5:09 PM
To: Chris Mueller
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote:
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list
* Jeremy L. Gaddis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 00:13]:
[...]
On the same note, I run Windows on my desktop machines because, at
this time, Linux, IMO, sucks ass as far as desktops go.
Let the worms runneth over.
On your mark, get set, go!
*Pulling the fire alarm*
--
Brian Clark |
On Thursday 31 January 2002 09:17 pm, Brian Clark wrote:
* Jeremy L. Gaddis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 00:13]:
[...]
On the same note, I run Windows on my desktop machines because, at
this time, Linux, IMO, sucks ass as far as desktops go.
Let the worms runneth over.
On your
56 matches
Mail list logo
