Thanks for everyone's feedback and votes. I will now close this vote and
results will be sent shortly.
Best,
Dehowe
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:41 PM Kevin Ratnasekera
wrote:
> Kevin Ratnasekera
> Fri, Sep 24, 2021, 5:04 PM
> to dev
>
> +1
>
> I checked the following.
>
> - Incubating in
Kevin Ratnasekera
Fri, Sep 24, 2021, 5:04 PM
to dev
+1
I checked the following.
- Incubating in name.
- PGP Signatures.
- SHA512 Checksums.
- DISCLAIMER exists.
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine.
- ASF headers on source files.
Regards
Kevin
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:48 AM vongosling
+1
I checked:
- LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are ok
- No binary in the source distribution
- incubating is in the name
Dehowe Feng 于2022年1月19日周三 07:38写道：
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have
> been
> working toward it.
>
> To
I feel that we should ask this question: are we judging copyright claims at
high level or low levels of programming. Or rather: compiled or
non-compiled code. Take: src/include/parser/cypher_expr.h, this is a file
in incubator-Apache AGE. The name of the function call declared in that
function:
Thanks, then +1 based on my checking
--
Juan Pan(Trista), Twitter: @tristaZero
On 01/24/2022 02:03，Josh Innis wrote：
There is some code that the AGE team wrote that is in those files, but no
third party code is in
vongosling -
"Do we have a plan to transfer all pg files to an external directory?"
Could you please clarify what *you *mean by an external directory? Is it
another directory in our repository or not in our repository at all?
Additionally, is this a requirement? Per Justin, or at least from my
Do we have a plan to transfer all pg files to an external directory? I have
seen we have many files like we have pointed.
Josh Innis 于2022年1月24日周一 02:03写道：
> There is some code that the AGE team wrote that is in those files, but no
> third party code is in those files.
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022
There is some code that the AGE team wrote that is in those files, but no
third party code is in those files.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 8:46 AM John Gemignani
wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> Not necessarily the file names but the contents of those files.
>
>
> John
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022, 3:31 AM Juan
Hi Juan,
Not necessarily the file names but the contents of those files.
John
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022, 3:31 AM Juan Pan wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
>
> I see. I just want to double check the following files all comes from
> PostgreSQL, not from others, right?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Hi Josh,
I see. I just want to double check the following files all comes from
PostgreSQL, not from others, right?
--
Juan Pan(Trista), Twitter: @tristaZero
On 01/23/2022 11:43，Josh Innis wrote：
Hi Trista,
From
Hi Trista,
>From the discussion from the last release the team reviewed the project and
determined that there was a large enough amount of the Postgres code base
in those files to warrant the Postgres header instead of the Apache header.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 6:35 AM Juan Pan wrote:
>
Hello,
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files exist.
[ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
The following files with source coding are all from Postgres project?
+1
--
Nick Sorrell
513.288.1084
https://cint.io
From: Pieterjan De Potter
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 3:15 AM
To: dev@age.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 0.7.0 Release
+1
On 19.01.22 00:37, Dehowe Feng wrote:
> Dear Apache Commun
+1
On 19.01.22 00:37, Dehowe Feng wrote:
Dear Apache Community,
This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have been
working toward it.
To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
*Add VLE
+1
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 5:41 PM Alex Kwak wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2022/01/18 23:37:59 Dehowe Feng wrote:
> > Dear Apache Community,
> >
> > This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have
> been
> > working toward it.
> >
> > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see
+1
On 2022/01/18 23:37:59 Dehowe Feng wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have been
> working toward it.
>
> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
>
> Functionalities included and addressed in this
+1
John
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:42 PM Young Seung Andrew Ko <
youngseung.and...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
> Finally VLE :)
> Nice work guys !
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:38 AM Dehowe Feng
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Apache Community,
> >
> > This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0.
+1
Finally VLE :)
Nice work guys !
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:38 AM Dehowe Feng wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have
> been
> working toward it.
>
> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
>
>
Dear Apache Community,
This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have been
working toward it.
To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
*Add VLE core to the MATCH clause.
*Added support for
19 matches
Mail list logo
