On "support"- Think you said it -
In reference to the links: Docker is not a replacement for Apache releases,
and should not be considered as such.
Should be clear nightly builds should not be on DockerHub, etc
From: Josh Innis
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022
Hi all, Thank you for your review and vote for Apache AGE version 0.7.0.
I'm happy to announce the vote has passed: Many thanks to our mentors for
helping us with the release and IPMC voters that reviewed and submitted
their feedback. We will now move to the next round of voting. 3 +1 Binding
Thanks for everyone's feedback and votes. I will now close this vote and
results will be sent shortly.
Best,
Dehowe
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:41 PM Kevin Ratnasekera
wrote:
> Kevin Ratnasekera
> Fri, Sep 24, 2021, 5:04 PM
> to dev
>
> +1
>
> I checked the following.
>
> - Incubating in
I will give this a +1.
However, I haven't seen any traction on this thread for a while. Should this be
closed and then reopened? Or, should we continue to try to get enough votes? Or?
Mentors, could you please give your input?
Thanks!
John
On 2022/01/10 04:38:32 Alex Kwak wrote:
> Sorry,
The community should have a discussion about the need for a docker image of
AGE Viewer before we vote on it.
A docker image of AGE Viewer will ease the adoption of AGE for graph
related problems. It makes it so that a user of AGE Viewer does not have to
have intimate knowledge of: Postgres, AGE,
