Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-31 Thread Felix Cheung
31, 2022 8:08:30 AM To: dev@age.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence The community should have a discussion about the need for a docker image of AGE Viewer before we vote on it. A docker image of AGE Viewer will ease the adoption of AGE for graph related problems

Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-31 Thread Josh Innis
eed. What support > model that will be etc. > > Mentor “vote” is more a proxy of having a clear understanding in the > community. > > > > From: Joe Fagan > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:14:42 PM > To: dev@age.apache.org > Subje

Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-30 Thread Felix Cheung
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for Viewer as it is for AGE @Felix The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was... "Neither of these threads expressly confirm the proj

Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-24 Thread Joe Fagan
Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for Viewer as it is for AGE @Felix The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was... "Neither of these threads expressly confirm the project's desire to adopt DockerHub distribution, they are just