William A Rowe Jr writes:
> Confusing... which patch is missing?
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1808457
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1829962
>
> It should not be possible at this point to need 1.x specific code
> that wouldn't correspond to a trunk commit.
I
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:50 AM, jean-frederic clere
wrote:
> On 19/06/18 11:02, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > Hi Jean-Frédéric,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:01 AM, wrote:
> >> Author: jfclere
> >> Date: Tue Jun 19 08:01:45 2018
> >> New Revision: 1833786
> >>
> >> URL:
Actually, while doing the same thing, but with the 1.52 release, it worked!
Unfortunately, I cannot swear I didn't change anything in MSVS setup, but I
don't think I did... maybe inadvertedly somehow...
From: Oleg Sivokon
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018
> No not really, but this gives me problems trying to build x86 on a x64
> computer so I just remove it from makefile.win.
> Just to make sure this is not an oversight: I'm on a x64 and am trying to
> build x64, no 32-bit is desired.
>
> !IF [$(COMSPEC) /c cl /nologo /? \
> |
On 19/06/18 11:02, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Hi Jean-Frédéric,
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:01 AM, wrote:
>> Author: jfclere
>> Date: Tue Jun 19 08:01:45 2018
>> New Revision: 1833786
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833786=rev
>> Log:
>> proposal for review.
>
> Usually APR backports
