We have an interface to fetch the RelMetadataQuery in RelOptRuleCall [1], which
I believe is the most common routine to query metadata during planning, I’m a
little confused for your saying
>The methods in RelMetadataQuery are for convenience only.
If these methods in RelMetadataQuery are only
Haisheng Yuan created CALCITE-3124:
--
Summary: Infinite rule matching when AggregateRemoveRule is
enabled for SUM0
Key: CALCITE-3124
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3124
Project:
Sorry folks. False alarm. The aggregator works fine, but my table scan was
faulty.
Thanks,
Gelbana
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 9:24 PM Muhammad Gelbana
wrote:
> With pleaseure. I'll try to fix it first to confirm that my assumption is
> correct.
>
> Thanks,
> Gelbana
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at
The goal is that it should be possible to add a new kind of metadata. The
methods in RelMetadataQuery are for convenience only. So you should be able to
use your new kind of metadata, and existing ones, without modifying
RelMetadataQuery.
If that is not possible, it’s a bug, and you should log
For historical reasons, perhaps. We need to parse and translate into CREATE
TABLE AS SELECT... if we are going to support this syntax for Postgres and SQL
Server.
- Haisheng
--
发件人：Julian Hyde
日 期：2019年06月12日 05:41:38
收件人：
主 题：Re:
In answer to your question, no I don't think Calcite should support SELECT INTO.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:53 PM Andrew O wrote:
>
> Indeed, unfortunately in this case it's pre-generated SQL so unfortunately
> is a fixed input style.
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 22:41 Julian Hyde, wrote:
>
> >
Indeed, unfortunately in this case it's pre-generated SQL so unfortunately
is a fixed input style.
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 22:41 Julian Hyde, wrote:
> I’ve never understood why some SQL dialects have “SELECT ... INTO table”.
> What’s wrong with “INSERT INTO table SELECT ...”?
>
> Julian
>
> > On
I’ve never understood why some SQL dialects have “SELECT ... INTO table”.
What’s wrong with “INSERT INTO table SELECT ...”?
Julian
> On Jun 11, 2019, at 1:27 PM, Andrew O wrote:
>
> Does / should Calcite support select into expressions? E.g. I'm using v1.19
> with queries of the style:
>
>
With pleaseure. I'll try to fix it first to confirm that my assumption is
correct.
Thanks,
Gelbana
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 8:44 PM Haisheng Yuan
wrote:
> Cool, can you create an issue for this bug?
>
> - Haisheng
>
> --
>
Cool, can you create an issue for this bug?
- Haisheng
--
发件人：Muhammad Gelbana
日 期：2019年06月12日 02:39:20
收件人：dev@calcite.apache.org (dev@calcite.apache.org)
抄 送：Haisheng Yuan
主 题：Re: How to avoid SUM0 or disable a rule ?
I believe
It's done in the SqlToRelConverter.java:5427. I don't think there is a
way currently to disable it (i may be wrong).
There should be a configurable option to disable this.
-Vamshi
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:31 PM Muhammad Gelbana wrote:
>
> I just cleared the reducible aggregate calls
I believe it's a bug because DoubleSum (Also LongSum and IntSum) are
initialized with a value of 0 [1]
[1]
https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/a3c56be7bccc58859524ba39e5b30b7078f97d00/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/interpreter/AggregateNode.java#L459
Thanks,
Gelbana
On Tue, Jun 11,
I just cleared the reducible aggregate calls collection at runtime (to void
the rule) and I'm still facing the same problem. This onviously has nothing
to do with the rule. I'll investigate further. Thanks for your help.
Thanks,
Gelbana
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 8:16 PM Haisheng Yuan
wrote:
>
Hi Gelbana,
You can construct your own AggregateReduceFunctionsRule instance by specifying
the functions you want to reduce:
public AggregateReduceFunctionsRule(Class aggregateClass,
RelBuilderFactory relBuilderFactory, EnumSet functionsToReduce) {
But I think the issue you described might
14 matches
Mail list logo
