Niclas Hedhman wrote:
It is useful that this kind of feedback reaches ComDev, so projects learn
from each other and can make informed decisions.
As Jan and me have written several times, OpenOffice moved its "Extras"
area (which, in the OpenOffice case, consists simply in a binary file
At Apache Camel we use camel-extras to host Camel components/modules that
depend on 3rd party dependencies that are incompatible with ASLv2.
After briefly discussing with some committers / contributors on our mailing
lists, I get the impression that most folks would prefer to migrate
camel-extras
Hi,
I come in a bit late on the discussion (I hope I won't break the mail
threading, I don't have a message to answer to…).
We were discussing the subject on camel-users and I was wondering if you
were aware of the very problematic behaviour of SourceForge?
I am referring to the following
Yes, ASF "central" has no strong opinion on the matter and delegates this
totally to the PMCs.
It is useful that this kind of feedback reaches ComDev, so projects learn
from each other and can make informed decisions.
Cheers
Niclas
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Raul Kripalani
On 13/07/2015 jan i wrote:
that was my understanding as well. AOO moved a while ago.
OpenOffice hasn't properly moved, and actually we need to get this done
by the next release. The current URL is temporary as
oooextras.mirror does not make sense (it is not a mirror) and it was
meant to
Hi!
A number of apache-extras projects are reserved names that PMCs registered
before the service was publicly announced.
(For reference: see a mail to PMCs of 12 Nov 2010 in archives of
community-private)
If one tries to access those names, they are redirected to official
pages at apache .org.
On 7/13/15 4:23 PM, jan i wrote:
On Monday, July 13, 2015, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
On 07/13/2015 04:00 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Apache-extras is a service managed by ComDev. Though we never provided
any commitment to support it.
However, many extras (most?) are used by ASF
Nalleymailto:da...@gnsa.us
Sent: 7/9/2015 8:51 PM
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving Apache Extras
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Thanks Daniel,
Sharing admin account with ComDev PMC makes sense
Bowenmailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com
Sent: 7/13/2015 12:47 PM
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving Apache Extras
On 07/09/2015 02:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hiya folks,
I'm the lucky person in charge of moving the some 350 projects from
Google Code to SourceForge
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving Apache Extras
On 07/09/2015 02:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hiya folks,
I'm the lucky person in charge of moving the some 350 projects from
Google Code to SourceForge.
This will happen over the course of next week
@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving Apache Extras
On 07/09/2015 02:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hiya folks,
I'm the lucky person in charge of moving the some 350 projects from
Google Code to SourceForge.
This will happen over the course of next week, save some freak accident
Hiya folks,
I'm the lucky person in charge of moving the some 350 projects from
Google Code to SourceForge.
This will happen over the course of next week, save some freak accident
occurs, however, SourceForge is not Google Code, and as such, there are
a few things we need to consider:
- I
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Thanks Daniel,
Sharing admin account with ComDev PMC makes sense.
By delegating read/write access to the new repos do you mean the ComDev
owned admin account will assign individual project admin rights to the
@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving Apache Extras
Definitely need admin rights to the new Pivot-Extras for the Pivot PMC.
Thanks,
~Roger Whitcomb
Apache Pivot PMC Chair
On Jul 9, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Thanks Daniel,
Sharing admin
not one to
specific owners.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: David Nalleymailto:da...@gnsa.us
Sent: 7/9/2015 8:51 PM
To: dev@community.apache.orgmailto:dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving Apache Extras
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Ross Gardler
:52 PM
To: ComDev
Subject: Re: Moving Apache Extras
It seems to me that moving to GitHub would be easier, since Google put a
Export to GitHub button on each project page, and I've used it and it works
well.
Perhaps I missed it, but was there a reason why SourceForge was chosen over
GitHub
...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 11:43 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Moving Apache Extras
Hiya folks,
I'm the lucky person in charge of moving the some 350 projects from Google
Code to SourceForge.
This will happen over the course of next week, save some freak accident
]
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 12:52 PM
To: ComDev
Subject: Re: Moving Apache Extras
It seems to me that moving to GitHub would be easier, since Google put a
Export to GitHub button on each project page, and I've used it and it works
well.
Perhaps I missed it, but was there a reason why
.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Gruno [mailto:humbed...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 11:43 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Moving Apache Extras
Hiya folks,
I'm the lucky person in charge of moving the some 350 projects from Google
Code to SourceForge
It seems to me that moving to GitHub would be easier, since Google put
a Export to GitHub button on each project page, and I've used it and
it works well.
Perhaps I missed it, but was there a reason why SourceForge was chosen
over GitHub? (Just curious... since I have no personal stake in this
20 matches
Mail list logo
