[jira] [Resolved] (COUCHDB-1702) Recv failure: Connection reset by peer in form_submit.js test

2013-04-12 Thread Adam Lofts (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Lofts resolved COUCHDB-1702. - Resolution: Invalid This issue is resolved with the recent changes to how the javascript tests

Roadmap process and merge procedure

2013-04-12 Thread Noah Slater
Devs, With 1.3.0 out, it is time we revisit these docs: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Roadmap_Process http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Merge_Procedure Our next bugfix release target is 1st May. Our next feature release target is 1st July. What do we need to do *now* to prepare for

[DISCUSS] Archive Apache CouchDB 1.2.1

2013-04-12 Thread Noah Slater
Dear community, I would like to archive Apache CouchDB 1.2.1 Reasons: * CouchDB 1.2.1 has been superseded by CouchDB 1.2.2 Archiving this release means that we no longer support it, and we will remove any references to it from our website and our wiki. However, the original files will still

[1/2] git commit: Add discuss_archive.txt

2013-04-12 Thread nslater
Updated Branches: refs/heads/master 2322af2cc - 052cdb5e0 Add discuss_archive.txt Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb-admin/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb-admin/commit/48f9cb18 Tree:

Re: [DISCUSS] Archive Apache CouchDB 1.2.1

2013-04-12 Thread Noah Slater
Thinking about this, we might want to clarify the difference between a release not being supported, and a release being archived. Obviously, it makes no sense to keep around two bugfix versions of the same minor release line. (In this case, 1.2.1 and 1.2.2.) But 1.2.1 was released in January, so I

Re: [DISCUSS] Archive Apache CouchDB 1.2.1

2013-04-12 Thread Robert Newson
+1 for clarifying. We're not dropping support for 1.2.1 yet, but (and obviously) the support will manifest as a fix in 1.2.3 (etc). B. On 12 April 2013 09:14, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Thinking about this, we might want to clarify the difference between a release not being

Re: [DISCUSS] Archive Apache CouchDB 1.2.1

2013-04-12 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
On 12 April 2013 09:14, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Thinking about this, we might want to clarify the difference between a release not being supported, and a release being archived. Obviously, it makes no sense to keep around two bugfix versions of the same minor release line. (In

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1475) _users design documents access

2013-04-12 Thread Jean-Pierre Fiset (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13630336#comment-13630336 ] Jean-Pierre Fiset commented on COUCHDB-1475: I agree that this needs to be