Re: GSoC 2021 participation

2021-03-28 Thread Bessenyei Balázs Donát
If there are any projects that don't exceed my CouchDB / erlang / JS knowledge, I'd make sure I'm available enough to support someone doing a GSoC with us. What's the workflow here? Do we have to apply as a project? Do we have to propose projects? I did look at "Prospective ASF mentors: read this"

Re: GSoC 2021 participation

2021-03-28 Thread Joan Touzet
The ASF often ends up doing GSoC. I don't think we've ever had the sponsor within the project for it (or for Outreachy, for that matter). The most critical part is being available on a regular basis for proper mentoring. If you don't think you can get that into your schedule, don't volunteer.

GSoC 2021 participation

2021-03-28 Thread Bessenyei Balázs Donát
Hi All, I've just seen that the ASF is accepted as a mentoring organisation for GSoC 2021. Is CouchDB interested in participating? I've never done a GSoC before, but I'd certainly be interested. I'd be happy to help a student contribute to CouchDB. What do you all think? Thank you, Donat

CouchDB download statistics for April 2020 - April 2021

2021-03-28 Thread Joan Touzet
Hey everyone, I'm overdue to post these: https://gist.github.com/wohali/78c14c9afa317bf665854d55ad1e70ed In short, our Docker downloads went up by ~20 million, and everything else held steady or decreased slightly. The biggest decline in downloads was our source tarball, down almost 70%. One

Re: 3.2 release?

2021-03-28 Thread Joan Touzet
Great! Excited to get help. Here's the release procedure: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Release+Procedure Make sure you have wiki access, your Apache creds should get you in. The most valuable thing you can do is make sure all of the PRs that we want to land, have

Re: 3.2 release?

2021-03-28 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Let’s do it :) Best Jan — > On 28. Mar 2021, at 19:03, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > We have a number of high profile improvements to 3.x since 3.1.1 came > out. I think it's about time for 3.2. Does everyone agree? > > If so, we should start a clock for ~2 weeks to finish closing

Re: 3.2 release?

2021-03-28 Thread Bessenyei Balázs Donát
+1 Let me know how I can help. Donat On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 7:03 PM Joan Touzet wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > We have a number of high profile improvements to 3.x since 3.1.1 came > out. I think it's about time for 3.2. Does everyone agree? > > If so, we should start a clock for ~2 weeks to

3.2 release?

2021-03-28 Thread Joan Touzet
Hi everyone, We have a number of high profile improvements to 3.x since 3.1.1 came out. I think it's about time for 3.2. Does everyone agree? If so, we should start a clock for ~2 weeks to finish closing out any last minute improvements, fixes, tweaks, etc. anyone wants to get in. -Joan "we did