Re: Getting FDB work onto master

2020-06-18 Thread Joan Touzet
Restarting this thread. Can I get an update on where things are at? On 31/03/2020 13:13, Paul Davis wrote: There are a few other bits to `make check` that aren't included in `make check-fdb`. Updating `make check` should just be a matter of taking our test subset and applying them to `make

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

2020-03-31 Thread Paul Davis
There are a few other bits to `make check` that aren't included in `make check-fdb`. Updating `make check` should just be a matter of taking our test subset and applying them to `make check`. On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:04 AM Garren Smith wrote: > > On the fdb branch we have a make check-fdb

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

2020-03-31 Thread Garren Smith
On the fdb branch we have a make check-fdb which is a subset of all the tests that should pass. I think we should use that instead of make check On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:34 PM Joan Touzet wrote: > Took a bit longer than expected, but it's been tested & validated, and > then re-pushed. I'll

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

2020-03-31 Thread Joan Touzet
Took a bit longer than expected, but it's been tested & validated, and then re-pushed. I'll push up the other platforms as well (except for CentOS 8, which still has a broken Python dependency). PR for the changes necessary was also merged to couchdb-ci. FDB should feel free to merge to

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

2020-03-30 Thread Joan Touzet
OOPS, looks like I pushed the wrong image. I'll build the kerl-based version of the image and re-push. This will take a couple of hours, since I have to build 3x Erlangs from source. Good to know step 1 works! Next step for y'all: fix `make check`. -Joan On 2020-03-30 6:05 p.m., Robert

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

2020-03-30 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
noting that https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2732/7/pipeline/ now fails because kerl isn't there. related? B. > On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:11, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > > Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

2020-03-30 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the 1st time was a spurious failure, timing related). B. > On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > > Hi, > > Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the check > passing, I'm trying this

Re: Getting FDB work onto master

2020-03-30 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
Hi, Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the check passing, I'm trying this now. First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system wide erlang 20 install instead. B. > On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Hi everyone, hope you're