thanksSkywalking community.i feel should be
apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage.skywalking be not a required module for
iotdb，separate from apache/iotdb.
---Original---
From: "Xiangdong Huang"https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9059
Best,
---
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'IoTDB/IoTDB-Pipe/master [master] [591]':
Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/IoTDB/job/IoTDB-Pipe/job/master/591/;>IoTDB/IoTDB-Pipe/master
[master] [591]"
Hi all,
Skywalking community is discussing about only keeping self-implemented
storage layer.
IMO, I think it is not a bad decision to remove 3rd-part implementataion
from skywalking's main repo. Because we can decide which version of
skywalking we can maintain according to the community
