Andy Seaborne created JENA-913:
--
Summary: jena-osgi-test breaks a build of Jena with mavn clean
verify starting with an empty repo.
Key: JENA-913
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-913
Hi,
because the topic came out in another mailing list [1], I've quickly
started to prepare the Debian packaging of Fuseki2. We are using that
approach in Marmotta [2] for quite a while. and I hope you find it useful.
The implementation is actually rather easy [3], and only affect the build
Thanks for counting those.
The report contains a JIRA closed count - if we make sure that all
significant PRs are recorded in JIRA because then the report generator
does the work and more importantly, anyone searching JIRA for resolved
issues will get a complete view of the project.
I'm
The latest changes to jena-osgi-test broke this jenkins job.
The job runs mvn clean verify.
The RAT plugin runs in the verify phase. This is the normal way it is
used.
But the surefire testing in jena-osgi-test only works if the earlier
jena-osgi has been installed into the local repo.
Hello Andy,
It's submitted in time. I saw your notes, thanks. Here're some further
questions.
1) API of QueryExecution
Does the API look like:
- IteratorQuad QueryExecution.execConstrucQuads()
- Dataset QueryExecution.execConstructDataset()
2) master.jj
How does master.jj generate arq.jj? What
GitHub user stain opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/50
JENA-909 - Docker image for Fuseki 2
JENA-909 - Docker image for Fuseki
This is based on Maven, which is run either inside the Docker image, or if
target/dist already exist in the host, use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392480#comment-14392480
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-909:
-
GitHub user stain opened a pull request:
Board report copy.
Forwarded Message
Subject: [REPORT] Apache Jena : April 2015
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:50:43 +0100
From: Andy Seaborne a...@seaborne.org
## Description:
A framework for developing Semantic Web and Linked Data
applications in Java.
## Activity:
The project
On 02/04/15 09:58, Sergio Fernández wrote:
Hi,
because the topic came out in another mailing list [1], I've quickly
started to prepare the Debian packaging of Fuseki2. We are using that
approach in Marmotta [2] for quite a while. and I hope you find it useful.
The implementation is actually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-913:
---
Summary: jena-osgi-test breaks a build of Jena with maven clean verify
starting with an empty repo.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392748#comment-14392748
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-868:
--
Commit
[INFO] Located keyring at /home/stain/.gnupg/secring.gpg
[INFO] Creating debian package:
/home/stain/src/jena/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-war/target/jena-fuseki-war-2.0.1-SNAPSHOT_2.0.1~20150402142559_all.deb
[WARNING] Signing requested, but no key supplied
[WARNING] Signing requested, but no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392693#comment-14392693
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-913:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392642#comment-14392642
]
Stian Soiland-Reyes commented on JENA-909:
--
We might eventually want to get it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392630#comment-14392630
]
Stian Soiland-Reyes edited comment on JENA-909 at 4/2/15 12:14 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392630#comment-14392630
]
Stian Soiland-Reyes commented on JENA-909:
--
(See my comments on JENA-868 there)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392641#comment-14392641
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-909:
Other projects work includes:
TAJO-1423
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-868:
---
Summary: Fuseki2: docker: Redirected ports lead to wrong URLs. (was:
Fuseki2: Can't create datasets/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392756#comment-14392756
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-868:
The service name is the external name so it is hard
Testing got tricky as we changed away from that LGPLed OSGi test
plugin I had earlier (I believe that managed to run as part of the
same jena-osgi module).
The pax runner we use now needs to be able to link to a JAR file, but
it gets a bit awkward when it's part of the same build - that's why
perhaps this can help:
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/properties-mojo.html
On 2 April 2015 at 15:50, Stian Soiland-Reyes st...@apache.org wrote:
Testing got tricky as we changed away from that LGPLed OSGi test
plugin I had earlier (I believe that managed to run as
21 matches
Mail list logo
