Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491]

2015-04-17 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 03/04/15 03:47, Qihong Lin wrote: 3) query string sytax I went through TriG syntax. By the way: in SPARQL Update there is a similar form INSERT which takes a TriG+variables template. This is the grammar that you need; the embedded java may need changing or not (I'm not sure but it looks

Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491]

2015-04-14 Thread Andy Seaborne
@jena.apache.org Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 12:44 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491] The command line tools work with the extended ARQ syntax if: 1/ The file name ends .arq or 2/ --syntax arq so you can use qparse to test queries. qparse also does some internal testing - it parses

Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491]

2015-04-12 Thread Qihong Lin
Hello, Please check my reply below: On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Ying Jiang jpz6311...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Andy, Now, we are at proposal ranking phase 1: indicate willingness to mentor, with the deadline of April 12 00:00 UTC. I've already registered as a Possible mentor for Qihong's

Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491]

2015-04-12 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
From: Qihong Lin confidence@gmail.com To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 9:10 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491] Hello, Please check my reply below: On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Ying Jiang jpz6311...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Andy, Now, we

Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491]

2015-04-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
/blob/7b3b10134f4201314d5f6c6103a595181e82f997/jena-arq/Grammar/arq.jj#L39 From: Qihong Lin confidence@gmail.com To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 9:10 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491] Hello, Please check my reply below: On Thu, Apr 9, 2015

Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491]

2015-04-12 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
the same result with qparse? If so I will update JENA-632 :) Thanks Andy!Bruno From: Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 12:44 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491] The command line tools work with the extended ARQ syntax

Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491]

2015-04-08 Thread Andy Seaborne
Hi Ying, What is the next process step for GSoC this year? As mentor, you probably want to see this project as starting now. As you know, I don't have time to mentor this year and so can't really guarantee technical invovement at short notice. The proposal will updating for the comments;

Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491]

2015-04-04 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 03/04/15 03:47, Qihong Lin wrote: Hello Andy, It's submitted in time. Good. Ying - what is the next process step? I saw your notes, thanks. Here're some further questions. 1) API of QueryExecution Does the API look like: - IteratorQuad QueryExecution.execConstrucQuads() - Dataset

Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491]

2015-04-02 Thread Qihong Lin
Hello Andy, It's submitted in time. I saw your notes, thanks. Here're some further questions. 1) API of QueryExecution Does the API look like: - IteratorQuad QueryExecution.execConstrucQuads() - Dataset QueryExecution.execConstructDataset() 2) master.jj How does master.jj generate arq.jj? What

Re: Fwd: Proposal submitted [JENA-491]

2015-04-01 Thread Andy Seaborne
Hi there, What's the status on this? Was it submitted? I've put some notes on JENA-491 that related to the proposal about the proposed syntax and the way to modify the grammar. One of the important things to make sure happens is that the work is visible on this list (confidence.sun@ is