I’d like to summarise the minor changes we made to KIP-714 as we completed the
code
in Kafka 3.7.0.
* Introduced “*” to differentiate “all metrics subscribed” from “no metrics
subscribed”.
* Corrected the ACL operation for AlterConfigs to ALTER_CONFIGS on CLUSTER.
* Removed the “block” option
The vote for KIP-714 has now concluded and the KIP is APPROVED.
The votes are:
Binding:
+4 (Jason, Matthias, Sophie, Jun)
Non-binding:
+3 (Milind, Kirk, Philip)
-1 (Ryanne)
This KIP aims to improve monitoring and troubleshooting of client
performance by enabling clients to push metrics
Hi, Andrew,
Thanks for the KIP. +1 from me too.
Jun
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 4:00 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman
wrote:
> This looks great! +1 (binding)
>
> Sophie
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 1:46 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On 9/13/23 5:48 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > >
This looks great! +1 (binding)
Sophie
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 1:46 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 9/13/23 5:48 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > Hey Andrew,
> >
> > +1 on the KIP. For many users of Kafka, it may not be fully understood
> how
> > much of a challenge client
+1 (binding)
On 9/13/23 5:48 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
Hey Andrew,
+1 on the KIP. For many users of Kafka, it may not be fully understood how
much of a challenge client monitoring is. With tens of clients in a
cluster, it is already difficult to coordinate metrics collection. When
there are
Hey Andrew,
+1 on the KIP. For many users of Kafka, it may not be fully understood how
much of a challenge client monitoring is. With tens of clients in a
cluster, it is already difficult to coordinate metrics collection. When
there are thousands of clients, and when the cluster operator has no
Hey Andrew -
Thank you for taking the time to reply to my questions. I'm just adding
some notes to this discussion.
1. epoch: It can be helpful to know the delta of the client side and the
actual leader epoch. It is helpful to understand why sometimes commit
fails/client not making progress.
2.
Hi Philip,
Thanks for your vote and interest in the KIP.
KIP-714 does not introduce any new client metrics, and that’s intentional. It
does
tell how that all of the client metrics can have their names transformed into
equivalent "telemetry metric names”, and then potentially used in metrics
Hey Andrew -
+1 but I don't have a binding vote!
It took me a while to go through the KIP. Here are some of my notes during
the reading:
*Metrics*
- Should we care about the client's leader epoch? There is a case where the
user recreates the topic, but the consumer thinks it is still the same
Bumping the voting thread for KIP-714.
So far, we have:
Non-binding +2 (Milind and Kirk), non-binding -1 (Ryanne)
Thanks,
Andrew
> On 4 Aug 2023, at 09:45, Andrew Schofield wrote:
>
> Hi,
> After almost 2 1/2 years in the making, I would like to call a vote for
> KIP-714
>
-1, non-binding, for reasons previously stated.
Ryanne
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023, 3:46 AM Andrew Schofield <
andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> After almost 2 1/2 years in the making, I would like to call a vote for
> KIP-714 (
>
Hi Andrew,
+1 (non-binding)
This is a huge step in enabling end-to-end observability for users and
hopefully even help us get a better idea where we can improvement the client
behavior.
And +100 re: librdkafka team involvement.
Thanks!
> On Aug 8, 2023, at 4:00 AM, Milind Luthra
> wrote:
Hi Andrew, thanks for working on the KIP.
+1 (non binding)
Thanks,
Milind
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 2:16 PM Andrew Schofield <
andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> After almost 2 1/2 years in the making, I would like to call a vote for
> KIP-714 (
>
Hi,
After almost 2 1/2 years in the making, I would like to call a vote for KIP-714
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-714%3A+Client+metrics+and+observability).
This KIP aims to improve monitoring and troubleshooting of client performance
by enabling clients to push metrics
+1 Thanks Magnus!
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 5:43 AM Magnus Edenhill wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> It's that time of year again where we re-restart this vote thread after
> some additional
> discussions on the disco thread and minor adjustments to the
> KIP.
>
> We're currently at +5 (non-binding) and -1
Hey all,
It's that time of year again where we re-restart this vote thread after
some additional
discussions on the disco thread and minor adjustments to the
KIP.
We're currently at +5 (non-binding) and -1 (non-binding) votes.
Please cast your votes, people.
Thanks,
Magnus
Den tors 3 mars
+1
As a member of a team which operates several Kafka clusters, I am
unequipped when it comes to troubleshooting issues with project teams
that did not understand the importance of configuring client-side
monitoring.
Kafka represents a fraction of their work and they don't have enough
experience,
+1
I think this KIP solves a problem that has been around for some time with Kafka
deployments, which is the ability to assess the current state of a Kafka
architecture but looking at the whole picture. I also share other folks'
concerns regarding adding runtime dependencies to the clients;
Hi all,
it's been a while and there's been some more discussions of the KIP which
have been
addressed on the KIP page.
I think it's a good time to revive this vote thread and get things moving.
We're currently at +3 (non-binding) and -1 (non-binding) votes.
Regards,
Magnus
Den mån 1 nov.
+1
We also have a lot of clients using our central Kafka cluster, and it would
be great to have client metrics so we can provide end-to-end monitoring.
Igor Buzatović
Porsche Digital
On 2021/11/01 20:19:20 J Rivers wrote:
> +1
>
> Thank you for the KIP!
>
> Our organization runs kafka at large
+1
Thank you for the KIP!
Our organization runs kafka at large scale in a multi-tenant configuration.
We actually have many other enterprises connecting up to our system to
retrieve stream data. These feeds vary greatly in volume and velocity. The
peak rates are a multiplicative factor of the
-1
Ryanne
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021, 4:30 AM Magnus Edenhill wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-714.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2xRRCg
>
> Discussion thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg119000.html
>
> Thanks,
> Magnus
>
Hi MagnUs,
Thanks for the KIP.
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Anna
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021, 5:30 AM Magnus Edenhill wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-714.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2xRRCg
>
> Discussion thread:
>
Hi all,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-714.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2xRRCg
Discussion thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg119000.html
Thanks,
Magnus
24 matches
Mail list logo
