Re: [VOTE] KIP-981: Manage Connect topics with custom implementation of Admin

2024-03-27 Thread Greg Harris
Hi Omnia! Thank you for your response. I want to make sure that we both understand the motivations and designs here, and we can make a fair evaluation. > pluggable extension point Can you explain the difference? To me, both "plugin" and "pluggable extension point" refer to an API that lets

Re: [VOTE] KIP-981: Manage Connect topics with custom implementation of Admin

2024-03-27 Thread Omnia Ibrahim
Hi Greg thanks for the feedback and sorry for the late response. > I don't think we can adapt the ForwardingAdmin as-is for use as a > first-class Connect plugin. > 1. It doesn't have a default constructor, and so can't be included in > the existing plugin discovery mechanisms. > 2. It doesn't

Re: [VOTE] KIP-981: Manage Connect topics with custom implementation of Admin

2024-03-14 Thread Greg Harris
Hi Omnia, Thanks for the KIP. I don't think we can adapt the ForwardingAdmin as-is for use as a first-class Connect plugin. 1. It doesn't have a default constructor, and so can't be included in the existing plugin discovery mechanisms. 2. It doesn't implement Versioned, and so won't have version

Re: [VOTE] KIP-981: Manage Connect topics with custom implementation of Admin

2024-03-14 Thread Mickael Maison
Hi Omnia, +1 (binding), thanks for the KIP Mickael On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 10:46 AM Omnia Ibrahim wrote: > > Hi everyone, I would like to start the vote on KIP-981: Manage Connect topics > with custom implementation of Admin >

[VOTE] KIP-981: Manage Connect topics with custom implementation of Admin

2024-03-05 Thread Omnia Ibrahim
Hi everyone, I would like to start the vote on KIP-981: Manage Connect topics with custom implementation of Admin https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-981%3A+Manage+Connect+topics+with+custom+implementation+of+Admin Thanks Omnia