Hey Stephen,
It really depends how you copied the repository.
Have a look on output of "git remote -v" command.
For me its:
connectorio g...@github.com:ConnectorIO/plc4x.git (fetch)
connectorio g...@github.com:ConnectorIO/plc4x.git (push)
origin g...@github.com:apache/plc4x.git (fetch)
Hi Ben,
I forked the repo, actually had it forked for snapshot 0.7.0 so just
had to merge the commits from the repo.
On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 07:12 +1000, Ben Hutcheson wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I have pushed support for RTU to the branch feature/modbusrtu, it
> seems to
> work. I've only used RTU
Thanks Ben,
I'll get set up and fork the branch you noted.
I'm sure I'll need some hand holding, but I'll try to not be much
bother.
Regards,
Stephen
On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 07:12 +1000, Ben Hutcheson wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I have pushed support for RTU to the branch feature/modbusrtu, it
>
Hi Stephen,
I have pushed support for RTU to the branch feature/modbusrtu, it seems to
work. I've only used RTU over TCP using the connection string
modbus-rtu:tcp://127.0.0.1:502. There is also a few things to update docs,
test and refactoring.
Until it gets merged into the develop branch it
Hi Ben,
On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 06:50 +1000, Ben Hutcheson wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thank you for the offer and if it's ok I'll certainly take you up on
> it.
>
Sure, what snapshot should I point maven to? Currently I have 0.8.0
that I was playing with a bit yesterday.
> Next week I'll be
Hi Stephen,
Thank you for the offer and if it's ok I'll certainly take you up on it.
Next week I'll be starting a new job so I won't be contributing for a
while, However I'll try and get something up and running this week. If you
are able to test it and/or take over the implementation from there
I'd be more than willing to setup some equipment for a lab to test
with. Readily available to me are a couple of Omron CP1-H CPU's and a
Red Lion G3800C (which is outdated, but communicates with everything
ootb), plus I can easily get some Modicon stuff as well. The Omrons are
fitted with serial
Hi Stephen,
it's not that we're dropping anything ... it's just that we haven't put any
work into creating such a driver. Some day, if someone stumbles over PLC4X with
the need to use ASCII, we might implement it for them (Mabe as a paid-gig or
not).
In the inital days of PLC4X I invested a
you started.
>
> Chris
>
> Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
>
>
> From: Stavros Nicolakopoulos
> Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2021 9:27:27 AM
> To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AW: Modbus RT
he.org
Subject: Re: AW: Modbus RTU and RTU over TCP
You are right about the RTU over TCP -it should be the same as RTU over Serial,
just using the TCP transport- but the RTU protocol is slightly different. You
don't write the transaction ID, the protocol ID and the data length to the
You are right about the RTU over TCP -it should be the same as RTU over Serial,
just using the TCP transport- but the RTU protocol is slightly different. You
don't write the transaction ID, the protocol ID and the data length to the
buffer. And then you must compute the CRC (Cyclic Redundancy
Hi Stavros,
and welcome to our cool little project list :-)
As I mentioned on SO I would assume that it should be simple to implement
Modbus RTU as in general it should just be a different encapsulation and the
serial transport, we already have (or in case of RTU over TCP well that should
be
12 matches
Mail list logo
