Hi Von and Felix,
Thank you very much for your comments. I am actually working on fixing the
issue. It will be done in one or two days. I will keep you posted.
Jia
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:22 PM vongosling wrote:
> Thanks for your clarification. I wonder how things are going, looking
>
Thanks for your clarification. I wonder how things are going, looking
forward to the rc1 discussion.
Felix Cheung 于2021年1月14日周四 上午9:46写道：
> To clarify, what on
>
> Maven staging repository (search for "sedona", 12 artifacts in total):
> https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories
>
> Is
To clarify, what on
Maven staging repository (search for "sedona", 12 artifacts in total):
https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories
Is not source distribution. It’s the Maven Java repository of artifacts
(binaries)
Again the office ASF vote is on src.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:12
Hi,
I also checked the source code, the name of the decompressed file is
incubator-sedona-sedona-1.0.0-incubator... It's confusing.
And I see that the size of files reaches almost 600 MB +. There are a lot
of HDF files. I just wonder do we have a plan to optimize here :-)
Here's a list of the
I would like to make some more comments since the broken message as Felix
said.
4. It is recommended that the final package name be
sedona-core_2.11-incubating instead of [2](the source code is too large).
You must have at least src distribution(That's ok now, but do we only
distribute source
We should definitely have the source release on
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/
We are voting for source release (and the git tag) - binaries are for
convenience.
Von, can you clarify the final package name inline? I think you are looking
at the artifact ID not a package name?
I'd love to vote +1, but after I've looked at this release, I'm sorry, I
have to vote -1. This is just the early stage of release, and I think we
have the ability to smooth the release standardization process for apache.
Here, I'll point out some of the issues I've identified:
1. The recommended
Great Job!!
+1
Netanel Malka
On 2021/01/07 10:16:11, Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> After a fruitful discussion about our first Apache Sedona release
> 1.0.0-incubator, the release has been created. This is a call for vote to
> release Apache Sedona (incubating) 1.0.0.
>
> Note that: the
+1
Mo Sarwat
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:30 PM wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> This is Jinxuan Wu, I am giving this release a +1 (approve)
>
> Did following checks:
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> [x] DISCLAIMER is included.
> [x] Source code artifacts have
Hi,
This is Jinxuan Wu, I am giving this release a +1 (approve)
Did following checks:
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] DISCLAIMER is included.
[x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
On 2021/01/07 10:16:11, Jia Yu
Dear all,
Just a reminder, please cast your vote at your earliest convenience.
To make it easier for you, I just wrote a script to verify the GPG
signature and SHA1 checksum for all 12 release jars. This script has been
tested on Mac OS Catalina and Ubuntu 18.04.
All you need to do is three
Hi All,
After a fruitful discussion about our first Apache Sedona release
1.0.0-incubator, the release has been created. This is a call for vote to
release Apache Sedona (incubating) 1.0.0.
Note that: the current sha1 and checksum verification of Sedona will
require us to manually download
12 matches
Mail list logo
