Re: Handling questions in the mailing lists

2016-11-09 Thread Maciej Szymkiewicz
If you take a look at the statistics (https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/575406) you'll see that majority of the unanswered questions: * have seen no activity in the last year OR * don't have positive score OR * have been asked by inactive or new users. This is usually a

Contributing to Spark in GSoC 2017

2016-11-09 Thread Krishna Kalyan
Hello, I am Krishna, currently a 2nd year Masters student in (MSc. in Data Mining) currently in Barcelona studying at Université Polytechnique de Catalogne. I know its a little early for GSoC, however I wanted to get a head start working with the spark community. Is there anyone who would be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.2 (RC3)

2016-11-09 Thread Pratik Sharma
+1 (non-binding) > On Nov 9, 2016, at 3:15 PM, Ryan Blue wrote: > > +1 > >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Yin Huai wrote: >> +1 >> >>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Yin Huai wrote: >>> +! >>> On Wed, Nov 9,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.2 (RC3)

2016-11-09 Thread Ryan Blue
+1 On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Yin Huai wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Yin Huai wrote: > >> +! >> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Denny Lee wrote: >> >>> +1 (non binding) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.2 (RC3)

2016-11-09 Thread Yin Huai
+1 On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Yin Huai wrote: > +! > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Denny Lee wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM vaquar khan >> wrote: >> >>> *+1 (non binding)*

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.2 (RC3)

2016-11-09 Thread Yin Huai
+! On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Denny Lee wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM vaquar khan wrote: > >> *+1 (non binding)* >> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Weiqing Yang >> wrote: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.2 (RC3)

2016-11-09 Thread Denny Lee
+1 (non binding) On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM vaquar khan wrote: > *+1 (non binding)* > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Weiqing Yang > wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > > Environment: CentOS Linux release 7.0.1406 (Core) / openjdk version

Re: Handling questions in the mailing lists

2016-11-09 Thread Denny Lee
Here here! :) Completely agree with you - here's the latest updates to Proposed Community Mailing Lists / StackOverflow Changes . Keep them coming though at this point, I'd like to limit new verbiage to prevent

Re: Would "alter table add column" be supported in the future?

2016-11-09 Thread Herman van Hövell tot Westerflier
This currently not on any roadmap I know of. You can open a JIRA ticket for this if you want to. On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:02 PM, 汪洋 wrote: > Hi, > > I notice that “alter table add column” command is banned in spark 2.0. > > Any plans on supporting it in the future?

Re: Connectors using new Kafka consumer API

2016-11-09 Thread Cody Koeninger
Ok... in general it seems to me like effort would be better spent trying to help upstream, as opposed to us making a 5th slightly different interface to kafka (currently have 0.8 receiver, 0.8 dstream, 0.10 dstream, 0.10 structured stream) On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Mark Grover

Would "alter table add column" be supported in the future?

2016-11-09 Thread 汪洋
Hi, I notice that “alter table add column” command is banned in spark 2.0. Any plans on supporting it in the future? (After all it was supported in spark 1.6.x) Thanks. - To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Re: Handling questions in the mailing lists

2016-11-09 Thread Gerard Maas
Great discussion. Glad to see it happening and lucky to have seen it on the mailing list due to its high volume. I had this same conversation with Patrick Wendell few Spark Summits ago. At the time, SO was not even listed as a resource and the idea was to make it the primary "go-to" place for

RE: Handling questions in the mailing lists

2016-11-09 Thread assaf.mendelson
I was just wondering, before we move on to SO. Do we have enough contributors with enough reputation do manage things in SO? We would need contributors with enough reputation to have relevant privilages. For example: creating tags (requires 1500 reputation), edit questions and answers (2000),