Re: [Vote] SPIP: Continuous Processing Mode for Structured Streaming

+1 On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Weichen Xu wrote: > +1. > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Matei Zaharia > wrote: > >> +1 from me too. >> >> Matei >> >> > On Nov 3, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Wenchen Fan wrote: >> > >> > +1.

Re: [Vote] SPIP: Continuous Processing Mode for Structured Streaming

+1. On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Matei Zaharia wrote: > +1 from me too. > > Matei > > > On Nov 3, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Wenchen Fan wrote: > > > > +1. > > > > I think this architecture makes a lot of sense to let executors talk to > source/sink

Re: [Vote] SPIP: Continuous Processing Mode for Structured Streaming

+1 from me too. Matei > On Nov 3, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Wenchen Fan wrote: > > +1. > > I think this architecture makes a lot of sense to let executors talk to > source/sink directly, and bring very low latency. > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Sean Owen

Re: [Vote] SPIP: Continuous Processing Mode for Structured Streaming

+1. I think this architecture makes a lot of sense to let executors talk to source/sink directly, and bring very low latency. On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Sean Owen wrote: > +0 simply because I don't feel I know enough to have an opinion. I have no > reason to doubt the