DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29343.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I just found out I've been patching and testing the wrong branch of the Commons
Validator component :(
Between this snafu and the issues with Struts Faces, perhaps the best thing would be
to roll back the changes that create a dependence on Commons Validator 1.1.3.
Do we know if there are any
Robert,
It's very important to remember that the mere fact we roll a release doesn't mean it
will ever get past alpha. The overall average at Jakarta seems to be five or six
alpha/beta releases to each stable release.
This will be the second point release in the 1.2.x series. It may be voted
At 11:00 PM -0400 6/8/04, James Holmes wrote:
Good question. Depending on how long you've been paying attention to Struts
and the dev list in particular, you may know that things tend to move pretty
slow in the Struts development/release cycle world. Mostly this is because
the committers (I'm
The issue with the validator that prevents the struts-faces code from
working with Struts 1.1 and CVS head is the removal of .ValidatorUtil
and the creation of .util.ValidatorUtils. Struts 1.1 use ValidatorUtil
and the CVS head uses util.ValidatorUtils. The thing that could fix this is
At 9:55 AM -0400 6/9/04, James Holmes wrote:
The issue with the validator that prevents the struts-faces code from
working with Struts 1.1 and CVS head is the removal of .ValidatorUtil
and the creation of .util.ValidatorUtils. Struts 1.1 use ValidatorUtil
and the CVS head uses
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28668.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hmm...that build for the ninth wasn't up there this morning. Perhaps Craig
kicked the box :)
At any rate, we finally have a new build. Hopefully the nightly stuff will
be running again at its regularly scheduled time.
-James
-Original Message-
From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL
This seems like a good plan - it only has three methods which are the same
in both classes and the old could call the new
Niall
- Original Message -
From: James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 2:55 PM
Subject: RE:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/team-list.html
David
--- Michael Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are the struts committers the only ones who vote on validator? or is
there
an actual maintainer (and committers) for validator?
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 08:59:38 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote:
Someone needs to apply the patches to the VALIDATOR_1_1_2_BRANCH.
I'm not sure if Ted still has time to spend or not.
I've got some time scheduled to work on this Thursday night, or, if this isn't done,
setting up my credentials to sign a
Thanks for the heads up. I was going to test that out tonight.
Have you experienced any problems with the sample applications like those
mentioned in this posting:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=427thread=500294
I am seeing the same problems that are posted in the forum. I'm
12 matches
Mail list logo
