Date: 2004-08-31T23:32:49
Editor: NiallPemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsReleasePlans
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsReleasePlans
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@
Date: 2004-08-31T23:59:40
Editor: NiallPemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsRelease123
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
no comment
New Page:
= Struts 1.2.3 Release =
== Info ==
1. See Struts
Martin,
I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you uploaded. The JDK
issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar is still being
shipped. Now though its more consistent because the lib distribution also
has the wrong jar as well :-)
The disappointing thing from my
Date: 2004-09-01T00:07:47
Editor: MartinCooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsRelease123
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -10,7
Date: 2004-09-01T00:09:56
Editor: NiallPemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsRelease123
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -40,7
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 08:11:06 +0100, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin,
I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you uploaded. The JDK
issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar is still being
shipped. Now though its more consistent because the lib
Hello all,
2 notes :
- I'd like to test the 1.2.3 release on my app, what about bad jars in *1.2.3-lib.zip
dist ?
Should I download the full dist for those tests ?
- I'm writing an app with xhtml format and use the xhtml attribute of html:html tag
Why isn't the Globals.XHTML_KEY flag put
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:41:08 +0200, Nicolas De Loof
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
2 notes :
- I'd like to test the 1.2.3 release on my app, what about bad jars in
*1.2.3-lib.zip dist ?
Should I download the full dist for those tests ?
You probably tried to grab the distribution
I saw in CVS,
that URI for Struts-Faces points
also to Jakarta:
urihttp://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces/uri
@struts-el:
only tiles-el points to jakarta
(in Struts 1.2.3)
urihttp://struts.apache.org/tags-bean-el/uri
urihttp://struts.apache.org/tags-html-el/uri
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:31:27 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:14:15 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
I also suspect, given our track record :-), that re-engineering
Struts from scratch based on the latest platform APIs wouldn't take
more time than a gradual
niallp 2004/09/01 01:34:04
Modified:contrib/struts-el/doc/userGuide struts-tiles-el.xml
contrib/struts-faces/src/conf struts-faces.xml
Log:
Chage URI to struts.apache.org
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1
Thanks for pointing this out (and also Kunal Parikh) - I've updated this in
CVS.
Having said that, I'm not sure it makes any difference. I was under the
impression that these URI's should point to a publicly available copy of the
tld and but there aren't copies either on struts.apache.org or
Those URIs in taglibs are only used AFAIK to locate a taglib from a JSP % taglib %
directive without having to set a
taglib element in web.xml.
Notice I submited a ticket about tiles.dtd that uses jakarta.apache.org/struts.
Nico.
Thanks for pointing this out (and also Kunal Parikh) - I've
but there aren't
copies either on struts.apache.org or
jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
jup, but in struts.jar$/META-INF/tlds
there are the *.tlds
like for JSF:
--
%@ taglib uri=http://java.sun.com/jsf/html; prefix=h %
%@ taglib uri=http://java.sun.com/jsf/core;
The user guide was updated recently and the Committer section has been
removed and I now appear in the PMC Member section.
http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html
I assume this is a mistake ?
Niall
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Congradulation from Alan
Best Luck from me
Alan Mehio
London
Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The user guide was updated recently and the Committer section has been
removed and I now appear in the PMC Member section.
http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html
I assume this is a
Request scope came up under the original bug (although it doesn't say why
not):
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5518
The thinking behind page rather than request scope is in this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10893.html
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 08:11:06 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a
checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the Struts
1.2.2 release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in
the plan then the JDK issues would have
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30873.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
niallp 2004/09/01 03:41:11
Modified:conf/share tiles-config_1_1.dtd
Log:
Change comment URI to struts.apache.org
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +2 -2 jakarta-struts/conf/share/tiles-config_1_1.dtd
Index: tiles-config_1_1.dtd
We voted you in last month, Niall, and (I thought) I sent an announcement to the DEV
list.
Assuming you accept, let me know which email address do you want to use for the PMC
list?
(Joe, did you want yours changed?)
-Ted.
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:00:24 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
The user
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30933.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Nico,
I've corrected the comment, thanks for pointing this out.
Also, my apologies - I should have referred to the bug and credited you in
the CVS log message, but I forgot :-(
Sorry
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:22:42 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
Saw that. I just volunteered as RM... ;-)
Do you just want to roll and test it with the infrastructure issues resolved.
Or, do we want to apply some of the new patches, update the roadmap, and so forth?
-Ted.
I must have missed it - I've been on holiday.
I accept thanks. I'd like to use this email address (niall dot pemberton at
blueyonder dot co dot uk)
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01,
niallp 2004/09/01 04:34:00
Modified:contrib/struts-faces/web/example logon.jsp mainMenu.jsp
registration.jsp subscription.jsp
contrib/struts-faces/web/example2 footer.jsp header.jsp
layout.jsp layout1.jsp loggedoff.jsp
Thanks Matthias.
I've updated the jsps.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 11:30 AM
Subject: RE: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
To help avoid that sort of confusion, I've taken to using a urn: scheme
instead of an http: scheme for my taglibs. As an example, URIs for Struts
taglibs could look like:
urn:x-taglib:org.apache.struts.bean
urn:x-taglib:org.apache.struts.html
Where x-taglib is the URN Namespace ID. Not sure that
If its any help, the correct commons validator jar contains the the
validator_1_1_3.dtd
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:22 AM
I may had attached a patch for this to deserve any credit ;-)
Thanks
Nico.
Nico,
I've corrected the comment, thanks for pointing this out.
Also, my apologies - I should have referred to the bug and credited you in
the CVS log message, but I forgot :-(
Sorry
Niall
-
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:49:27 -0500, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
Isn't the bugzilla installation a single instance for the entire
apache community? Can it be decided by struts to upgrade the
entire apache bugzilla site? Or is it just a struts instance?
It's a single instance. As it stands, we
Date: 2004-09-01T07:00:59
Editor: HubertRabago [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsRelease123
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
Updated bug list with recent resolutions.
Change Log:
Date: 2004-09-01T07:45:04
Editor: TibiStibi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: ActionForms
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ActionForms
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -13,4 +13,17 @@
James Mitchell wrote:
That would be a bad mistake. How many products do you know that have a 1.5
minimum requirement?
If we're talking about Struts 2.0, it's not actually a product yet, so
it's purely speculation.
I'm not saying move the 1.x branch to 1.5. I'm not even saying that you
*should*
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 07:03:43 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:22:42 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
Saw that. I just volunteered as RM... ;-)
Do you just want to roll and test it with the infrastructure issues resolved.
Or, do we want to apply some of the new
Yes, you're right. I missed that when I changed the others before.
Niall has already fixed this in CVS (6 hours ago).
-Original Message-
From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 12:15 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22633.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30915.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This thread on TSS:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=28428
points out an error in the release notes (or perhaps the JavaDoc) concerning the
deprecation of ActionErrors. From the What's new? section:
Although not removed, in many cases you should replace the deprecated
The class has not been deprecated because it is part of the public
API of the ActionForm class, which is obviously routinely subclassed
for Struts apps.
Joe
At 12:23 PM -0400 9/1/04, Kris Schneider wrote:
This thread on TSS:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=28428
points
...an old discussion...
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29679
Regards,
Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:09 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Release notes error?
The class
On 1 Sep 2004 11:34:00 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
niallp 2004/09/01 04:34:00
Modified:contrib/struts-faces/web/example logon.jsp mainMenu.jsp
registration.jsp subscription.jsp
contrib/struts-faces/web/example2
Perhaps I am missing something,
but the only change was
jakarta.apache.org/struts
-- struts.apache.org
in .TLD-file and in JSPs (for 'uri'-attribute)
Regards,
Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:17 PM
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 09:56:41 -0500, David Durham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Mitchell wrote:
That would be a bad mistake. How many products do you know that have a 1.5
minimum requirement?
If we're talking about Struts 2.0, it's not actually a product yet, so
it's purely speculation.
No doubt. Then it sounds like the error is in the release notes, yes? There's an
additional post in the TSS thread that the JavaDoc class comment for
ActionErrors includes:
Each individual error is described by an ActionError object...
Which, strictly speaking, is inaccurate since you can also
It's more than a thought ... I was about three keystrokes from
including this in my proposal to be forward looking on servlet 2.4 and
JSP 2.0 :-).
I'd love to see Servlet2.4 and JSP2.0 be the minimum.
It was mentioned before that several of the 'itches' that
the committers have revolve
Kris,
ah I saw the section :)
Yes, I guess it must be ActionMessage instead of ACtionError,
:)
-Original Message-
From: Kris Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:37 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Release notes error?
No
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30997.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30998.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've updated this to include the correct Commons Validator jar and
pick up the latest changes from CVS.
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 00:02:12 -0700 (PDT), Martin Cooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In light of the Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water? thread, I've rolled and
uploaded a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30915.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26788.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
There's a saveErrors method in Struts 1.2.2 that takes an
ActionMessages object. This can cause a ClassCastException in
getErrors and addErrors, which expects an ActionErrors object.
I've added a patch, which would solve this issue. I'm a bit confused
if the use of ActionErrors is
I didn't change anything that referenced Struts 1.1 or Struts 1.2 - just the
struts-faces tld and the referencs in the struts-faces jsps for that tld.
Just means that struts-faces now reflects the Strut's TLP status. If it
causes a problem I'm happy for the changes to be reversed, but I can't see
Hi Martin.
Can you put the 1.2.3 in the maven repository please
(http://cvs.apache.org/repository) ?
Thanks.
Arnaud.
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 11:53:38 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've updated this to include the correct Commons Validator jar and
pick up the latest changes from
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:36:14 +0200, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Martin.
Can you put the 1.2.3 in the maven repository please
(http://cvs.apache.org/repository) ?
Not at this time. This is a preliminary build, and has not been
endorsed by anyone - not even me. ;-) It is there
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30915.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Craig McClanahan wrote:
snip
focused on the revolution approach rather than evolution.
That's not to say that we (as a project) can't do both in parallel.
Ted wrote: Hopefully, initiatives like Struts Chain and Portlet
support will help us make the HTTP layer an integration layer, rather
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30915.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The auto-discovery mechanism for tld files depends on the uri in the tld so changing
it can break applications that upgrade if they depend on the auto-discovery of tlds.
(They don't need a mapping in web.xml). Since the uri is just a meaningless string
(that should be globally unique), there is
Was this bug addressed in the 1.2.3 release?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30997
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 12:41:51 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:36:14 +0200, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Martin.
Can you put the 1.2.3 in
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:46:09 -0500, Michael Rasmussen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was this bug addressed in the 1.2.3 release?
Again: this is not a release - at least, not yet. It's a preliminary
build. No release notes changes have been made at this point.
--
Martin Cooper
Actually, it wasn't my decision to change the tld's uri - all I've done is
correct the inconsitency that eight were changed (bean, html, logic,
nested, tiles, bean-el, html-el and logic-el) and two were not (tiles-el and
faces). The original changes were done four months ago and no one objected
Maybe Craig's point was that you could put two copies of the tld in the jar's
META-INF, one with the old URI and one with the new. The tlds would be otherwise
identical but auto-discovery would work no matter what URI the application was using.
Not sure how else you would acheive this:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30842.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
niallp 2004/09/01 19:00:25
Modified:doc/userGuide release-notes-1.2.1.xml release-notes.xml
Log:
Correct release notes for ActionErrors bug 30997 submitted by Kris Schneider
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -2 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/release-notes-1.2.1.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30997.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Niall,
You may also want to add your name to the New committers on the release notes.
:)
- Hubert
On 2 Sep 2004 02:00:25 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
niallp 2004/09/01 19:00:25
Modified:doc/userGuide release-notes-1.2.1.xml release-notes.xml
Log:
Correct
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30717.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24631.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30842.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 18:45:22 -0400, Deadman, Hal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe Craig's point was that you could put two copies of the tld in the jar's
META-INF, one with the old URI and one with the new. The tlds would be otherwise
identical but auto-discovery would work no matter what URI
martinc 2004/09/01 21:48:11
Modified:conf/share MANIFEST.MF
Log:
Update version to 1.2.3.
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/conf/share/MANIFEST.MF
Index: MANIFEST.MF
===
RCS
Date: 2004-09-01T21:49:38
Editor: MartinCooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsRelease123
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease123
Progress update; added one open issue; added dependency version table.
Change Log:
74 matches
Mail list logo
