At 9:35 AM + 11/23/04, Roberto Tyley wrote:
I'd say the best way to get a copy of the Servlet 2.3 jar is to download
the Tomcat 4 binary (which uses Servlet API 2.3):
You can also download servlet API jars from:
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/servletapi/jars/
Joe
At 4:44 PM -0800 11/22/04, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:28:32 -0800, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps this might be a good time to bring up the idea of bringing
StrutsTestCase as a Struts subproject? They have an implementation of
the servlet api for testing.
Also,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32358.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Vic wrote:
I think Martin said chain is in trunk.
I would assume that the nighly bulids would then have chain in there,
and that it not be a separate download?
.V
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
repost
I think Martin said chain is in trunk.
I would assume that the nighly bulids would then have chain in there,
and that it not be a separate download?
.V
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Don Brown wrote:
When you start looking at configuration for defining procedures, it can
get messy quick - just look at Jelly. Many would argue XML is just not
a good fit for procedural code/definitions.
Good argument.
Even if you liked XML for
procedural configuration, I'm not sure chain's
The Struts nightly build contains whatever the result of running ant
clean dist in the struts/core/trunk directory produces. Until now,
that hasn't included Struts Chain, but that's easy to fix.
In the mean time, there is a nightly build of Struts Chain being
produced separately:
I think Martin said chain is in trunk.
I would assume that the nighly bulids would then have chain in
there, and that it not be a separate download?
Chain is not yet in the core, but getting it there is something I'm
interested in working on. It may also be just as well to wait a few
days
How would plugins work with the chain configuration?
I've written ActionServlet/RequestProcessor extensions and plugins in
the past. Often, the reason is to inject custom pre-, actual, or
post-processing at specific steps. An example would Tiles, which IIRC
intercepts the forward processing to
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:07:02 -0600, Vic Cekvenich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vic wrote:
I think Martin said chain is in trunk.
Huh? No, I don't think so...
struts-chain is in struts/sandbox/trunk, yes, and it will likely be
moved into struts/core/trunk as part of Struts 1.3. However, since we
At 11:26 AM -0600 11/23/04, Hubert Rabago wrote:
How would plugins work with the chain configuration?
I've written ActionServlet/RequestProcessor extensions and plugins in
the past. Often, the reason is to inject custom pre-, actual, or
post-processing at specific steps. An example would Tiles,
Inline.
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:42:37 -0600, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:26 AM -0600 11/23/04, Hubert Rabago wrote:
It would be nice if plugins can inject chain elements at specific
points in the chain at startup, programatically. This way, plugins
can be programmed to modify
Comments inline...
Joe Germuska wrote:
I think Martin said chain is in trunk.
I would assume that the nighly bulids would then have chain in
there, and that it not be a separate download?
Chain is not yet in the core, but getting it there is something I'm
interested in working on. It may also
At 11:58 AM -0600 11/23/04, Hubert Rabago wrote:
Specific apps would be able to do this, but I was trying to think from
the perspective of a plugin developer. I haven't looked at an example
yet, but would the use of tiles require both a struts-config change to
activate the plugin, as well as a
You may want to try EasyMock instead of these mock servlet api
implementations
http://www.easymock.org/
Once you get your head around how this works, you may not go back to using
concrete
Mock objects again.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My main question is how is the development community?
From a user point of view, it's dead. Occasionally a bug fix might be
committed to cvs, but no new development is occurring. The last closed RFE
was April of 2003.
From what I understand, what you're
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:58:11 -0800, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good. I would take it a step further, and, if no init parameter,
look for the chain config as /chain-config.xml, making it possible to
provide an intelligent default. We could then, take your idea in #3,
and
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:26:16 -0600, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would plugins work with the chain configuration?
I've written ActionServlet/RequestProcessor extensions and plugins in
the past. Often, the reason is to inject custom pre-, actual, or
post-processing at specific
Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
into an action-chain and view-chain, but maybe it should be more
finely grained?
Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The extreme case I have in mind would be one chain for each step that
the current request processor does. Yes, I know, it's extreme.
The other question here is simply whether to change the behavior of
the class named RequestProcessor (probably copying the current
behavior to a LegacyRequestProcessor) or rather to change the
default class used to point to a new class which implements the
Chain-based processing.
I like for
I've put forward a proposal to Commons Validator to add a facility to render
the dynamic javascript for form validation. If considered a good idea, and
Struts wanted to use it then most of the code in the JavascriptValidatorTag
would disappear. IMO it has significant improvements over the current
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:20:02 -0600, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to have a hook into processValidate() on validation failure.
Currently that can only be done by copy-and-pasting the processValidate()
method from RequestProcessor into a subclass and sticking a hook into the
22 matches
Mail list logo
