On 10/30/06, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, my original purpose is to find a way to best
handle the case where
we want to generate multiple types of output
without the Action
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
On Oct 26, 2006, at 8:03 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
I'll probably have some time to finish up the TilesContextFactory
configuration today and start doing some work on removing
duplication. Once I get through that I'll start putting some
container ideas down into
Hello!
I think that the taglib refactoring, i.e. all the deprecated/duplicated
stuff has been removed, has finished, so I think that SB-21 can be resolved:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-21
I had a little doubt about UseAttributeTag and ImportAttributeTag, but
they do different
On 10/30/06, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, my original purpose is to find a way to best
handle the case where
we want to generate multiple types of output
without the Action
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, ideally the Action should be able to focus on
the top-level
outcome of the business logic. Did the request
success or fail? Was
there a recoverable error? A fatal exception?
... and struts2 action being xwork action does just
this - no more or
On 10/30/06, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I quite agree with Konstantin. Adding more and more configuration
stuff is not very good imo. In fact right now I am thinking/working
about a light version of WW/Struts2 where the configuration is
completely reduced (the biggest problem I
Any idea on when is Dojo going to be bumped up to 0.4?
musachy
Don Brown wrote:
Yes, let's start with bumping up Dojo to 0.4, then apply patches to
update the tags. How much work do you think it'll be to upgrade Dojo?
Don
Musachy Barroso wrote:
I attached a new patch to WW-205, this one
No objections here.
Greg
On Oct 30, 2006, at 6:34 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Hello!
I think that the taglib refactoring, i.e. all the deprecated/
duplicated stuff has been removed, has finished, so I think that
SB-21 can be resolved:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-21
I had a
On 10/27/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the meantime, we've made the binaries available via SoruceForge.
* http://www.planetstruts.org/roller/page/news?entry=struts_2_0_1_jars
Since people.apache.org is up, can we get the distribution and
signatures put back in
On 10/30/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since people.apache.org is up, can we get the distribution and
signatures put back in
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.1/
so the links on the site will work?
Uploading now ...
At that point anyone who has time can work on
On 10/30/06, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... and struts2 action being xwork action does just
this - no more or less. it performed business logic
and determined outcome as string result name.
Agreed. The Action class should focus on business logic, and return a
result code
On 10/26/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then, each result selector is given a chance to select a single String.
If a result has when=modern-browser,partial-html,
the each selector will be given a chance to return its when token, and
xwork will match them together as AND.
Or, with
I really, really, like this idea, especially since it doesn't introduce
any new syntax or complications for the 90% of users that don't need
this. The more we can keep Struts/XWork to simple, internal components,
the easier it will be to worth with both as a user and as a developer.
This
YES! I like that. This seems to reduce the extra complexity from the
config but still provides the flexibility we're looking for.
David
Ted Husted wrote:
On 10/26/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then, each result selector is given a chance to select a single String.
If a result has
OK Ted, Result selector is real way to do.
It would not introduce any new configuration
( xwork config parser can be used ) and it can be made
flexible and extendable as i do not know what ;)
And AFAIR standart results/distpatchers already use
OGNL on supplied destinations, so this kind of
Hi all,
while looking into S2 codebase I miss picocontainer
support from webwork. As commiter and user of pico, I
would like to have the same functionality in S2
( with some patches fixing bugs, most imporant:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/WW-1370 )
And while we are at it, those problems
I believe the Pico stuff had to be pulled out due to unclear license
headers in an effort to get the WebWork code through the Apache
Incubator. That said, I'd be very open to a pico container plugin,
similar to the Plexus one. If you create a patch, I'll apply it :)
Don
Konstantin
Musachy,
I could upgrade the embedded Dojo files to the 0.4 release during the week.
If your patches for the s2 ajax tags already are against the 0.4 release,
I could apply those as well.
What do you (and others of course) think?
regards,
Rainer
Any idea on when is Dojo going to be bumped up
Hi Rainer
Give me a couple of days so I can test it against 0.4 (I made the patch
using 0.3) and finish some changes(for BindButton) that I have for a new
patch. I will give you a new patch soon with the changes for Bind,
BindDiv, BindAnchor, BindButton and TabbedPanel tested on dojo 0.4. If
On 10/30/06, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rainer
Give me a couple of days so I can test it against 0.4 (I made the patch
using 0.3) and finish some changes(for BindButton) that I have for a new
patch. I will give you a new patch soon with the changes for Bind,
BindDiv,
Oh, ok. Then just don't apply the patch. By the way, do we have a Jira
issue for the dojo upgrade?
musachy
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 10/30/06, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rainer
Give me a couple of days so I can test it against 0.4 (I made the patch
using 0.3) and finish some
On 10/30/06, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, ok. Then just don't apply the patch.
No, no - I'm not saying that it shouldn't be applied, only that it should be
a separate commit.
By the way, do we have a Jira
issue for the dojo upgrade?
Not that I can see. Feel free to add
:) I know. What I meant is that it shouldn't be applied yet 'cause I
made it using 0.3 and I haven't tried it on 0.4 yet.
musachy
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 10/30/06, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, ok. Then just don't apply the patch.
No, no - I'm not saying that it shouldn't
Hi guys,
sorry for jumping into this late. I think we should do the followings for
struts2 dojo widgets.
- use dojo.widget.defineWidget instead of the old-way of using dojo.provide,
dojo.extends etc. Dojo got most of its widget rewritten using this way.
- have struts2 widgets/utils as a
Hi guys,
Is it possible to have something like
result-type name=selector class=o.a..d.SelectorResult
param name=matcherso.a.s.d.RoleMatcher/param
param name=matcherso.a.s.d.AgentMatcher/param
param name=wrapso.a.s.d.ServletDispatcherResult/param
/result-type
so that we don't
On 10/30/06, tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to have something like
result-type name=selector class=o.a..d.SelectorResult
param name=matcherso.a.s.d.RoleMatcher/param
param name=matcherso.a.s.d.AgentMatcher/param
param
I'm using defineWidget, and it is cool. I will be looking into hostedqa
given that it is being used in struts already, as per Don's comment
somewhere on this thread.
musachy
tm jee wrote:
Hi guys,
sorry for jumping into this late. I think we should do the followings for
struts2 dojo
Hi guys,
I've go ahead and added a jira issue for struts2 dojo migration, Its at
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1484
rgds
Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using defineWidget, and it is
cool. I will be looking into hostedqa
given that it is being used in struts already,
I don't see these factory implementations changing much. Instead, what
will change is how tiles interfaces with surrounding frameworks.
Specifically how it is:
1) Configured/Initialized
2) Invoked
3) Destroyed
By surrounding frameworks.
Instead of utilizing a series of static invocations,
What do I need to do to get the permissions reset for files that are
now owned by apbackup?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/30/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do I need to do to get the permissions reset for files that are
now owned by apbackup?
I'm on IRC, I'll ask...
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/30/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do I need to do to get the permissions reset for files that are
now owned by apbackup?
I'm on IRC, I'll ask...
It should be fixed now.
--
Wendy
On 10/30/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in /www/people.apache.org/builds/struts/
I see Ted has 2.0.1 up there, but all others say still owned by
apbackup.
Oh, I thought you meant /www/struts.apache.org . (That's what I asked
them to fix.)
Everything I saw that is not group
On 10/29/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * Add a line with 'umask 002' to both ~/.bash_profile and ~/.bashrc . The
former is used when you log in, the latter for remote ssh commands (such as
when publishing the site with Maven.) This will make the files group
writeable, so that
--- Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the Pico stuff had to be pulled out due to
unclear license
headers in an effort to get the WebWork code through
the Apache
Incubator.
Well, what should be there in the headers then?
As pico commiter I'm open to negotiations ;)
That
I'm using defineWidget, and it is cool.
Yup. Is it that the bind, binddiv, bindanchor etc have been written with
dojo.widget.defineWidget? If so, this would be great. :-) I've converter the
bind component using defineWidget... but looks like it could be deleted now
:-)
I will be
Hi guys,
I've go ahead and added a jira issue for struts2 dojo migration, Its at
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1484
rgds
Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using defineWidget, and it is
cool. I will be looking into hostedqa
given that it is being used in struts already,
37 matches
Mail list logo
