I've finished work on a new version of the Confluence Snippet macro that
we use in our Struts docs. This new version features:
- Plugin configuration page to change all settings (no longer
hard-coded to Struts)
- URL's are restricted to defined prefixes (more secure)
- Snippet errors are
Hello!
I am now facing the problem of the integration of Tiles 2 with Struts 1,
there is a JIRA issue for this:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-15
I wish to know from you if this integration must be put:
1. in Struts 1, replacing the current struts-tiles module;
2. in Tiles, creating
The official plugin page is here:
http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CONFEXT/Snippet+Plugin
Don
Don Brown wrote:
I've finished work on a new version of the Confluence Snippet macro
that we use in our Struts docs. This new version features:
- Plugin configuration page to change all
First of all this is a typical question to be submitted in Struts Users
mailing list.
Anyway, since Tiles 2 is under development, I will answer anyway.
Stone, Sam ha scritto:
I can instantiate the DefinitionsFactory. I can get a
ComponentDefinition OK. I cannot figure out how to forward the
Thank you.
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Dec 5, 2006, at 12:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wsmoak
Date: Mon Dec 4 21:06:17 2006
New Revision: 482492
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=482492
Log:
Added readme file.
Added:
If Tiles is to be truly standalone, it's my opinion that all of the
integration should be in the component that is embedding tiles - not in
tiles itself. Otherwise, the Tiles PMC will end up having to track
Struts1, Struts2, Velocity, Shale, and all sorts of other integration
points. I don't
Moving to Struts Users list, please reply there.
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
First of all this is a typical question to be submitted in Struts Users
mailing list.
Anyway, since Tiles 2 is under development, I will answer anyway.
Stone, Sam ha scritto:
I can instantiate the DefinitionsFactory. I
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
Just to avoid confusion, I don't think Antonio meant to imply that the
Container.render returns a ComponentContext.
Err... right, my confusion was due to wrong cut'n'paste :-)
Antonio
-
To
7 Votes for Greg. I believe that we have a unanimous decision.
Congratulations Greg.
I will update the board resolution with your name.
David
David H. DeWolf wrote:
I'd like to propose a vote for the Tiles PMC Chair. The individual with
the simple majority will be recommended to the board
Great news. We have consensus regarding the fact that we should ask the
board to approve the Tiles TLP Resolution.
+1 - 10
0 - 0
-1 - 0
During voting a couple of things came up:
1) We should not submit the resolution with the original proposal.
Instead, the resolution should suffice.
2)
On Dec 5, 2006, at 7:31 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
If Tiles is to be truly standalone, it's my opinion that all of the
integration should be in the component that is embedding tiles -
not in tiles itself. Otherwise, the Tiles PMC will end up having
to track Struts1, Struts2, Velocity,
On 12/5/06, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I am now facing the problem of the integration of Tiles 2 with Struts 1,
there is a JIRA issue for this:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-15
I wish to know from you if this integration must be put:
1. in Struts 1, replacing
Niall Pemberton ha scritto:
Better IMO to be in Struts1 - but until Tiles2 has a GA release the
current struts-tiles module can't be replaced, otherwise it will
prevent a GA release of Struts1. If you're ready to start work on
this now then we could copy the exisiting code to a new
struts-tiles2
One alternative I thought of last night is to bring Struts-Tiles into
the TLP as Tiles 1x. We could quickly get a GA out so Tiles would
have a GA in and of itself. Then we could continue work on Tiles 2.
Does anyone else see the need for that?
Thanks,
Greg
On Dec 5, 2006, at 9:38 AM,
On 12/5/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One alternative I thought of last night is to bring Struts-Tiles into
the TLP as Tiles 1x. We could quickly get a GA out so Tiles would
have a GA in and of itself. Then we could continue work on Tiles 2.
Does anyone else see the need for that?
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
One alternative I thought of last night is to bring Struts-Tiles into
the TLP as Tiles 1x. We could quickly get a GA out so Tiles would
have a GA in and of itself. Then we could continue work on Tiles 2.
I don't think that it is an alternative, but another issue. I
On 12/5/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One alternative I thought of last night is to bring Struts-Tiles into
the TLP as Tiles 1x. We could quickly get a GA out so Tiles would
have a GA in and of itself. Then we could continue work on Tiles 2.
Does anyone else see the need for that?
Greg Reddin wrote:
One alternative I thought of last night is to bring Struts-Tiles into
the TLP as Tiles 1x. We could quickly get a GA out so Tiles would have
a GA in and of itself. Then we could continue work on Tiles 2.
Does anyone else see the need for that?
I'd prefer not. I think
On Dec 5, 2006, at 12:07 PM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Greg Reddin wrote:
One alternative I thought of last night is to bring Struts-Tiles
into the TLP as Tiles 1x. We could quickly get a GA out so Tiles
would have a GA in and of itself. Then we could continue work on
Tiles 2.
Does
To update the tags documentation, do I need to request rights to edit
the pages online? If so, how? Or do I need to send a patch for the stuff
under /doc/tags?
regards
musachy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 12/5/06, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To update the tags documentation, do I need to request rights to edit
the pages online? If so, how? Or do I need to send a patch for the stuff
under /doc/tags?
Once your CLA is recorded (I believe you said you faxed it yesterday?)
then one
What I want to edit are the tag references. I'm not sure if they get
created with the snipped macro, they are under
/docs/tags
thanks
musachy
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 12/5/06, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To update the tags documentation, do I need to request rights to edit
the
The actual tag reference pages are mainly mainly a shell for pulling
in the snippets from the Javadocs. These are the pages linked from
here:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/tag-reference.html
For example, here's what the source for the action tag page looks like:
{note}Please make
On 12/5/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) We may want to add a small self-referential description in order
avoid the board requesting more info.
small NON-self-referential description :)
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe,
GMail has been marking many JIRA posting as spam lately (no doubt
because several are now). In case anyone missed it, Rainer posted a
comment to the ticket.
* http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1537?page=all
-Ted.
On 12/4/06, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I need help
There is a table tag reference page.
* http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/table
The showcase examples are catch-as-catch-can. There not being one
doesn't imply anything. If you like the tag, and can come up with a
showcase example, please send it along.
-Ted.
On 12/2/06, Mark
I did missed that one :)
I'm not sure about the ajaxHref, because it means the same as href,
IMO it is going to be confusing.
What if we don't build the url at all, and just use it as it is (
addParameter(href), findString(href)), and document that the url needs
to be built with the url tag
struts-master is currently 4-SNAPSHOT
What can be done to get this rolled as 4.0?
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28 matches
Mail list logo
