Validators aren't called if there's the submitted value is null.
That's why JSF components have a required attribute instead of a
standard JSF requiredValidator.
It's not possible to create a required validator without creating an
independent component-tree-scanning component that manually
It seems like there's some overlap between this and weblets, with
weblets functionality being a subset of this concept.
https://weblets.dev.java.net/
http://java.sys-con.com/read/159161.htm
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
This has come up recently on the Myfaces-dev mailing list. We're
probably going to be splitting off a jsf commons package at some
point. Myfaces/share contains what would probably end up in such a
package.
Do a search for thread [proposal] myfaces-core.jar on the
myfaces-dev mailing list, Nov
On 11/29/05, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* CommonsValidator
This is a JSF Validator, so it could well be attached to a UIComponent
stored in session scope. It's not obvious from a static review of the code
what's the problem, but if there is one it'll need to be fixed.
It
David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is all good stuff, but I'd rather see integration with
Tiles instead of reinventing Tiles. Tiles has already covered some of
this ground and I see no reason for us to follow.
I haven't used JSF enough to see if it fits the same pattern, but
Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duncan Mills seems to characterize this as PrivateProcess. Something
like that seems far more didactic and helpful to me than something it
really is not, like Dialogue or Conversation. My suggestion is that
the name reflect precisely what it is.
Perhaps
Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other issues with keeping Eclipse files in our repo:
1) The expectation would be that they would be kept up to date. If a
particular committer doesn't use Eclipse, I don't think it's fair to
expect them to keep Eclipse config files up to date when they
Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My main question is how is the development community?
From a user point of view, it's dead. Occasionally a bug fix might be
committed to cvs, but no new development is occurring. The last closed RFE
was April of 2003.
From what I understand, what you're
Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
into an action-chain and view-chain, but maybe it should be more
finely grained?
Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The extreme case I have in mind would be one chain for each step that
the current request processor does. Yes, I know, it's extreme.
to one
address
/more sarcasm
-Mike
- Original Message -
From: Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: Separate Lists for Wiki Commits?
Richard Bywater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Michael McGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way that it would make sense in the future to allow
developers using Struts to specify their own interface for multipart
request handlers? This is probably a stupid suggestion but couldn't
Struts leave the interface at something like:
Rick Reumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Without using Javascript to swap out the form Action name, I'm curious
how you guys accomplish using multiple buttons for a form without the
use of a DispatchAction?*
You could of course submit to one regular Action that will look at the
parameters
Rick Reumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Kienenberger wrote the following on 9/17/2004 2:17 PM:
Any time you allow an end user an opportunity to specify a parameter for
reflection, you're introducing security concerns.
However, a secure version could be created by only allowing
It's also very easy to create your own custom DatabaseMessageResource class
following the methodology that James used.
Just create a trivial DatabaseMessageResourcesFactory extends
PropertyMessageResourcesFactory to point to your DatabaseMessageResource
class, then in your
Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:47:01 -0400, Dave Brosius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
h.. I think i see why parking happens :)
Please enlighten us. I'm missing the link between a request to follow
our standard bug reporting process and parking...
Bugzilla for
15 matches
Mail list logo
