Greg Reddin ha scritto:
It would make sense to bring Dimensions and Scopes into a Tiles
project. They deal directly with Tiles.
Sorry to contradict you, but only Dimensions deal directly with Tiles,
Scopes is only Servlet-dependent.
Antonio
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
Ok, I'm convinced. I'm on board with a Tiles TLP.
This morning (remember I am in Italy :-) ) I read all the new messages
and I am convinced too.
Anyway the concept of forming a website for web-related stuff, from my
POV, should not be discarded.
The big problem
Greg Reddin wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:48 PM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
And, who's volunteering to Chair?
Perhaps it goes without saying, but the chair is actually appointed by
the ASF board, we can only make a suggestion.
Though, it probably doesn't make sense to propose the TLP if we
On 11/29/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm not sure of is whether there are any prequalifications for
being a chair, for example, does a chair already have to be an ASF
member or a PMC member of an Apache project? Or is it basically
whoever the board wants to appoint?
It can
Greg Reddin wrote:
Since we've failed to build consensus, I've published a versioned
snapshot that will have to suffice for 2.0.2 and I will begin to drive
the effort for TLP :( - it's not my preference but it will have to work.
Hang on, slow down just a bit :-) Before we jump off the
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
2) Apache Web Components TLP - What components will make up this
list? Who needs to be involved in the discussion? What's the
process to proceed?
This is my preference. I think the next steps would be to follow up
with the other potential projects to see if
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
2) Apache Web Components TLP - What components will make up this
list? Who needs to be involved in the discussion? What's the
process to proceed?
This is my preference. I think the next steps would be to follow up
with the other
On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:46 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
3) Apache Tiles TLP - Seems we could do this here and now and
submit a proposal to the board. Who else should we bring into the
discussion?
Doable, and probably the easiest to get going - but also the
hardest to maintain. It doesn't
Greg Reddin wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:46 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
3) Apache Tiles TLP - Seems we could do this here and now and submit
a proposal to the board. Who else should we bring into the discussion?
Doable, and probably the easiest to get going - but also the hardest
to
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
There's a lot of people who *use* Tiles, but how many of them are
legacy users who don't want to grow with it? How many of them will be
contributors?
Well, it's under our nose: how many Struts users are contributors?
Currently Struts is a worldwide project deployed in
But we still get a lot of questions about Tiles and Nathan's point
about users being contributers is valid. Perhaps some of them will
step forward and contribute patches as they see the need. The need
will be way more apparent in a TLP with a small focused community.
Greg
On Nov 28,
On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:46 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Greg Reddin wrote:
Here's the viable choices as I see them:
1) Jakarta Web Components Subproject - What components will make
up this list? Who all needs to be involved in the discussion?
I'm not inclined to follow this path as Jakarta
Greg Reddin wrote:
2) Apache Web Components TLP - What components will make up this
list? Who needs to be involved in the discussion? What's the
process to proceed?
This is my preference. I think the next steps would be to follow up
with the other potential projects to see if they are
On 11/28/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Perhaps I'm looking at this too selfishly, but I'm thinking that if
nothing else the teams can help each other with the infrastructure and
burden of being a TLP. For example:
- Moderating Mail Lists
- Board Reports
- Managing Jira
-
Ok, I'm convinced. I'm on board with a Tiles TLP. If someone doesn't
beat me to it, I'll go ahead and write something up on the wiki.
David
Nathan Bubna wrote:
On 11/28/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Perhaps I'm looking at this too selfishly, but I'm thinking that if
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:19 PM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Ok, I'm convinced. I'm on board with a Tiles TLP. If someone
doesn't beat me to it, I'll go ahead and write something up on the
wiki.
I'm still thinking but close :-) Would the current TLP proposal
suffice?
What about other
Greg Reddin wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:19 PM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Ok, I'm convinced. I'm on board with a Tiles TLP. If someone doesn't
beat me to it, I'll go ahead and write something up on the wiki.
I'm still thinking but close :-) Would the current TLP proposal suffice?
Good.
On 11/28/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about other people? Are David Geary and Matthias Wessendorf
listening? They were on the original TLP and might be interested in
joining the project. Craig also indicated his interest. Wendy?
You're on every other apache project, might
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:48 PM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Greg Reddin wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:19 PM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Ok, I'm convinced. I'm on board with a Tiles TLP. If someone
doesn't beat me to it, I'll go ahead and write something up on
the wiki.
I'm still thinking but close
Greg Reddin wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:48 PM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Greg Reddin wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:19 PM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Ok, I'm convinced. I'm on board with a Tiles TLP. If someone
doesn't beat me to it, I'll go ahead and write something up on the
wiki.
I'm still
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:48 PM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
And, who's volunteering to Chair?
Perhaps it goes without saying, but the chair is actually appointed
by the ASF board, we can only make a suggestion.
I went digging for some information about the role of a chair and
found these:
21 matches
Mail list logo
