Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-21 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/20/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we require these snapshot plugins in our POM somehow? I'm fine with working with snapshots, but their download and use should be automatic. When the Javadoc plugin gets fixed, yes. For now, the released versions are working (you just don't

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-20 Thread Don Brown
Can we require these snapshot plugins in our POM somehow? I'm fine with working with snapshots, but their download and use should be automatic. Don Wendy Smoak wrote: On 4/18/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We definitely need an action/src/site directory to contain the root site.xml

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/14/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... to get the Javadoc generated for the site, add this to action/pom.xml: reporting plugins plugin groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId artifactIdmaven-javadoc-plugin/artifactId

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/18/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We definitely need an action/src/site directory to contain the root site.xml that others inherit, and if you can get over the aforementioned issue, then collecting all docs there would work for me. I moved action/core/src/site up to src/site,

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-14 Thread James Mitchell
I spent some time yesterday looking at what's left wrt the sample apps. From struts/action/ I can execute the following: $mvn (which runs the install target by default) Looks like all artifacts are built correctly, so I proceeded to deploy all of the web apps... struts-cookbook - was

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-14 Thread Dakota Jack
Interesting that you would put [action1] in when discussing struts but not [faces] when discussing faces. This is a real upside down deal, isn't it? On 4/5/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to address some the current [action 1] build issues. Now that we've simplified the

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/14/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I spent some time yesterday looking at what's left wrt the sample apps. Thanks. :) struts-mailreader - good to go (Does the web tests work for this yet?) They're done with Canoo Webtest, right? I didn't find a m2 plugin for it, but we

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
Another one from the chat log... to get the Javadoc generated for the site, add this to action/pom.xml: reporting plugins plugin groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId artifactIdmaven-javadoc-plugin/artifactId ... (and repeat for other reporting plugins.

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/5/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, is it 1.3.1 or 1.3.2? The versions are correct. Struts Tiles has a separate build and is at 1.3.1-SNAPSHOT, having had a 1.3.0 test build. The Struts Action jars (core, el, extras, taglib...) will be versioned together and should be at

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 4/6/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/5/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, is it 1.3.1 or 1.3.2? The versions are correct. Struts Tiles has a separate build and is at 1.3.1-SNAPSHOT, having had a 1.3.0 test build. The Struts Action jars (core, el, extras,

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-06 Thread Don Brown
James Mitchell wrote: I'd like to address some the current [action 1] build issues. Now that we've simplified the directory structure (thanks Don!), I'd like to spend some time on our build process. Please comment on the following, if I don't hear back soon I'll go ahead and take care

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-06 Thread Don Brown
Ok, I'm working with Wendy to do the Maven 2 conversion. Here is the plan we have decided on: 1. All the jar artifacts (core, taglib, el, faces, scripting, extras) get their own directory and pom 2. All the war artifacts, including the example apps from modules like faces and scripting,

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-06 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 4/6/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I'm working with Wendy to do the Maven 2 conversion. Here is the plan we have decided on: 1. All the jar artifacts (core, taglib, el, faces, scripting, extras) get their own directory and pom 2. All the war artifacts, including the