You are referring to Martin's DownloadAction I believe... Note that he
didn't place it in the action package, he placed it in the actions
package. It's a subtle difference, but an important one. As I
understand it, the action package are the core classes and interfaces of
Struts, while the
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:07:06 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are referring to Martin's DownloadAction I believe... Note that he
didn't place it in the action package, he placed it in the actions
package. It's a subtle difference, but an important one. As I
understand
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
You are referring to Martin's DownloadAction I believe... Note that he
didn't place it in the action package, he placed it in the actions
package. It's a subtle difference, but an important one. As I
understand it, the action package are the core classes and
Craig McClanahan wrote:
The proposed example is a good first step, but the hard part of
building a framework, as opposed to an application, is figuring out
where to define the extension points. An example issue relevant to
the current proposal -- what if I want to load my data from somewhere
Michael McGrady wrote:
I would never add something that is a mere solution to a non-framework
problem.
But this is really the crux of the debate, and is also the reason I find
myself simultaneously agreeing and disagreeing with you :)
The distinction between what is a mere solution to a
Way down there...
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:51:55 -0700, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:07:06 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are referring to Martin's DownloadAction I believe... Note that he
didn't place it in the action package, he
