Antonio Petrelli ha scritto:
...not to mention a strange effect that I had last week under Linux
(this evening I will check it, I have Linux only at home) that made
the Selenium tests fail. I did not open the issue simply because I was
not sure about it.
Ok false alarm :-) just tested
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 11/21/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible for tiles2 to 'graduate' into a full struts project
(sibling of struts1 and struts2) until it gains a little more momentum?
I actually think this would make a great deal of sense as an interim step
On Nov 22, 2006, at 11:55 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Ok, so what should I do to drive this to a decision? If we have
any sort of consensus, I'd like try to get it done before the
struts 2.0.2 release so that we can have the tiles plugin use an
alpha release. That may not be doable at
On 11/22/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so what should I do to drive this to a decision? If we have any
sort of consensus, I'd like try to get it done before the struts 2.0.2
release so that we can have the tiles plugin use an alpha release. That
may not be doable at this
On Nov 22, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Personally, I don't think it's a good idea for either _project_ (for
Struts to be an umbrella project, or for Tiles 2 to be so closely
associated with Struts.) However, it seems to be the best choice
right now for the people involved.
That's
On 11/22/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 11/21/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible for tiles2 to 'graduate' into a full struts project
(sibling of struts1 and struts2) until it gains a little more momentum?
I actually think
On 11/21/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 11/20/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about getting an initial tiles release out so that the 2.0.2 tiles
plugin can rely upon it instead of a snapshot? It would probably only
be
'alpha' quality at
Ted Husted ha scritto:
On 11/21/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts?
The key question is whether there are at least three (3) active
committers who are using Tiles in their own projects and could vote +1
for GA release, should the build quality warrant.
For what I can say,
Ted Husted wrote:
On 11/21/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts?
The key question is whether there are at least three (3) active
committers who are using Tiles in their own projects and could vote +1
for GA release, should the build quality warrant.
When making the tally,
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
1) Do we need to support EL for an alpha release?
I think this an issue that needs to resolved, since it will be the
replacement of beanName and similar attributes in Tiles configuration
files. There was a feature in Tiles 1.1 and it has been erased when
those
On Nov 21, 2006, at 9:30 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
procedural ones which we MUST take care of but are trivial
(Copyright notices, and Id Keywords,
I do think this one's critical to get out before alpha.
retroweaver distributions),
Probably could wait til after alpha.
1) Do we need to
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
For what I can say, surely Tiles 2 cannot be released as GA (neither as
alpha I suppose) since there is a blocking issue (just reopened :-) )
and some major issues, not to mention a strange effect that I had last
week under Linux (this evening I will check it, I have
On 11/20/06, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper ha scritto:
If so, the next question would be whether
or not we have enough people and enough energy to jump-start it.
A good (non Apache yet but with Apache License) candidate for Java Web
Components could be Java Web
On 11/21/06, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
On Nov 21, 2006, at 9:15 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
What I'm more concerned about is the community/oversight.
How will Tiles 2 be accepted when compared with Sitemesh, etc? I
don't know. The JSF community
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're misunderstanding. The purpose of
Jakarta Web Components is to
form a grouping of small web-related projects, along
the same lines as
Jakarta Commons but focussed on web related stuff.
It is specifically not a
project in and of
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 11/20/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about getting an initial tiles release out so that the 2.0.2 tiles
plugin can rely upon it instead of a snapshot? It would probably only be
'alpha' quality at this point, but the same snapshot logic that you
Well said, exactly what I was trying to communicate.
I was just hoping that we weren't stuck in the sandbox since that
seems like it will prevent an alpha release.
David
Greg Reddin wrote:
On Nov 21, 2006, at 9:15 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
What I'm more concerned about is the
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
On Nov 21, 2006, at 9:15 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
What I'm more concerned about is the community/oversight.
How will Tiles 2 be accepted when compared with Sitemesh, etc? I
don't know. The JSF community has Facelets and Clay, so Tiles support
is more of a
On 11/21/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts?
The key question is whether there are at least three (3) active
committers who are using Tiles in their own projects and could vote +1
for GA release, should the build quality warrant.
When making the tally, we should keep in
On 11/20/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/20/06, David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about getting an initial tiles release out so that the 2.0.2 tiles
plugin can rely upon it instead of a snapshot? It would probably only be
'alpha' quality at this point, but the same
20 matches
Mail list logo
