From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/24/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the intent was that Standalone Tiles should rely on Servlets
2.3 and JSP 1.2, as does Struts Classic. I hope that's still the case,
and that we just need to fix up Tiles to conform to that.
: Thursday, August 25, 2005 7:44 AM
To: Struts Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Standalone Tiles - JSP version tld file
On 8/24/05, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if I'm piping up late on this.
What's
+1
That's pretty much my experience too.
So, with that said, can we move standalone to subproject level or are
we waiting on something?
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
On Aug 25, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
However, I've got a separate / semi-related question. Given that
we're changing package names anyway, it would be really cool to
abstract away the servlet API specific calling sequences, so that
standalone Tiles could work equally
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:44 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Martin-
there is also an issue with the Maven build for Tiles standalone.
the dtds are not inside the jar file, *after* maven build
Make sure you're svn copy is up to date. I believe Wendy fixed that.
If I run maven jar I get the DTDs
So, with that said, can we move standalone to subproject
level or are
we waiting on something?
A sublevel project of Struts sounds fine,
but here is also a proposal from Ted, since Tiles
is used by others like Velocity or MyFaces
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/TilesTopLevel
-Matthias
ok, fine.
:-)
I'll look at it, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Reddin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:26 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Standalone Tiles - JSP version tld file
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:44 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
fine,
I'll close that bug
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 4:17 PM
To: Matthias Wessendorf
Subject: Re: Standalone Tiles - JSP version tld file
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there is also an issue
On 8/25/05, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
However, I've got a separate / semi-related question. Given that
we're changing package names anyway, it would be really cool to
abstract away the servlet API specific calling
On 8/25/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
That's pretty much my experience too.
So, with that said, can we move standalone to subproject level or are
we waiting on something?
One interesting wrinkle is that Integrated Tiles (the version that
has org.apache.struts.tiles
On 8/25/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My preference would definitely be to support only one version, with
that version being the one we expect to support in future releases.
So, +1 for supporting Standalone Tiles only.
+1
Le 05-08-25 à 10:53, Craig McClanahan a écrit :
On 8/25/05, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
However, I've got a separate / semi-related question. Given that
we're changing package names anyway, it would be really cool to
abstract
On 8/25/05, David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 05-08-25 à 10:53, Craig McClanahan a écrit :
On 8/25/05, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
However, I've got a separate / semi-related question. Given that
we're changing
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:55 PM, David Geary wrote:
I'm +1 for this, but should we make plugging standalone Tiles back
into Struts
a priority and tackle this once that's done? Perhaps it's unfounded,
but I'm
concerned that the current Tiles will change if we don't act quickly.
If Tiles needs
On 8/25/05, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:55 PM, David Geary wrote:
I'm +1 for this, but should we make plugging standalone Tiles back
into Struts
a priority and tackle this once that's done? Perhaps it's unfounded,
but I'm
concerned that the current Tiles
Le 05-08-25 à 13:24, Craig McClanahan a écrit :
On 8/25/05, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:55 PM, David Geary wrote:
I'm +1 for this, but should we make plugging standalone Tiles back
into Struts
a priority and tackle this once that's done? Perhaps it's
If you guys are ready to do the work, I'd say let's just do it, and we
can use Tiles subproject with Classic 1.3.x. We're shipping
subprojects in this release series, and we might as well just ship
them all and be done with it. Having two versions of Tiles is likely
to cause more confusion than
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on struts-user)
test.jsp has this:
%@ taglib uri=http://jakarta.apache.org/tiles; prefix=tiles %
Jakarta? That can't be right... there's a problem:
The tld in last night's tiles-core.jar has a JSP 1.1 tld with that uri,
which is coming from src/conf.
I noticed
On 8/24/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on struts-user)
test.jsp has this:
%@ taglib uri=http://jakarta.apache.org/tiles; prefix=tiles %
Jakarta? That can't be right... there's a problem:
The tld in last night's tiles-core.jar has a JSP 1.1 tld with
On 8/24/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on struts-user)
test.jsp has this:
%@ taglib uri=http://jakarta.apache.org/tiles; prefix=tiles %
Jakarta? That can't be right... there's a problem:
The tld
On 8/24/05, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if I'm piping up late on this.
What's the plans for Tiles? Will we support embedded tiles or will
we simply adapt standalone to work as we do for the commons stuff?
That's
21 matches
Mail list logo
