Re: Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

2004-10-14 Thread Mike Stanley
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 23:18, Martin Cooper wrote: On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 06:26:00 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:22:38 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: That said, I would really like to see us all stick together for as long as possible, and not diverge into 1.x

Re: Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

2004-10-13 Thread Ted Husted
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:22:38 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:  That said, I would really like to see us all stick together for as  long as possible, and not diverge into 1.x and 2.x paths too soon,  simply because I don't think there is enough energy here to sustain  two parallel version of Struts.

Re: Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

2004-10-13 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 06:26:00 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:22:38 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: That said, I would really like to see us all stick together for as long as possible, and not diverge into 1.x and 2.x paths too soon, simply because I don't think

Re: Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

2004-10-12 Thread Martin Cooper
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:40:38 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:38:26 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: At this point, I'm not sure we all agree on what would constitute a part of v2 rather than v1, since I anticipate some fairly substantial changes going into what

Re: Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

2004-10-11 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:25:06 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:22:27 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: Splitting out the database part of mailreader seems like an obvious first step. How about a top level examples directory with a mailreader-database

Re: Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

2004-10-10 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 08:29:20 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 21:06:44 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: ... Interestingly, this subproject has four subsubprojects ... Are you counting the MailReader database as a separate artifact? I hadn't been, and that

Re: Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

2004-10-10 Thread Ted Husted
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:22:27 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:  Splitting out the database part of mailreader seems like an obvious  first step.  How about a top level examples directory with a  mailreader-database subdirectory to contain this artifact?  If  the business logic turns out to be

Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

2004-10-09 Thread Craig McClanahan
I've taken advantage of the new capabilities that Subversion provides for refactoring, to set up struts-faces as a top-level subproject with the ability to create its own release artifact. Interestingly, this subproject has four subsubprojects that provide its content as well, so the top-level