DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32341] - Shale org.apache.shale.Constants breaks OOP

2004-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32341. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32341] - Shale org.apache.shale.Constants breaks OOP

2004-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32341. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: LazyValidatorActionForm...validation key?

2004-11-22 Thread Danny Mui
oh nothing's changed..just went from basic ValidatorActionForm = SuperDuperLazyForm and noticed my validations weren't firing. Just got a bit confused until digging deeper. Niall Pemberton wrote: *Munging* the path was in the original version of BeanValidatorForm - so whats changed? If you

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32341] - [Shale] org.apache.shale.Constants breaks OOP

2004-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32341. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Build with SVN

2004-11-22 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:26:50 -0800, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ARChives are down -- search errors -- so I have to ask a question which has probably been covered well there. There are at least 4 sets of archives: http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/SummarizeList?listId=240

Re: Can JSF Navigation be Reasonably Rewritten?

2004-11-22 Thread Vic
I think you will get a lot more feedback at the Apache MyFaces, A Struts siter project. Consider posting there. http://www.marinschek.com/myfaces/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=MailingLists .V Dakota Jack wrote: Is there a potential useful and reasonable rewrite of JSF so that the sort of navigation

Re: Can JSF Navigation be Reasonably Rewritten?

2004-11-22 Thread Craig McClanahan
The page navigation *mechanism* in JSF is pluggable -- you need to provide an implementation of javax.faces.application.NavigationHandler, which could then do things like look at Struts action mappings to figure out where to go next, instead of (or in addition to) the JSF navigation-rule stuff.

Re: Build with SVN

2004-11-22 Thread Dakota Jack
Thanks, Martin -- Jack On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:04:02 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:26:50 -0800, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ARChives are down -- search errors -- so I have to ask a question which has probably been covered well

svn commit: r106242 - /struts/sandbox/trunk/struts-chain/src/java/org/apache/struts/chain/CreateAction.java

2004-11-22 Thread germuska
Author: germuska Date: Mon Nov 22 15:54:57 2004 New Revision: 106242 Modified: struts/sandbox/trunk/struts-chain/src/java/org/apache/struts/chain/CreateAction.java Log: fix context key: should use method-scoped variable 'actionsKey', not instance-scoped variable 'actionKey' Modified:

svn commit: r106246 - /struts/sandbox/trunk/struts-chain/project.xml

2004-11-22 Thread germuska
Author: germuska Date: Mon Nov 22 16:05:57 2004 New Revision: 106246 Modified: struts/sandbox/trunk/struts-chain/project.xml Log: update 'extends' element; add mockobjects dependencies to encourage test writing Modified: struts/sandbox/trunk/struts-chain/project.xml Url:

Experiences with MockObjects for Servlet testing?

2004-11-22 Thread Joe Germuska
I just found an annoying bug in struts-chain, where CreateAction was looking up the map of actions under one key, and if not found, creating a new map and storing it under another key. The net result being that every CreateAction request was resulting in the initialization of a new Action

Re: Experiences with MockObjects for Servlet testing?

2004-11-22 Thread Don Brown
Perhaps this might be a good time to bring up the idea of bringing StrutsTestCase as a Struts subproject? They have an implementation of the servlet api for testing. Don Joe Germuska wrote: I just found an annoying bug in struts-chain, where CreateAction was looking up the map of actions

Re: Experiences with MockObjects for Servlet testing?

2004-11-22 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:28:32 -0800, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps this might be a good time to bring up the idea of bringing StrutsTestCase as a Struts subproject? They have an implementation of the servlet api for testing. Also, someone (Howard?) mentioned at ApacheCon that

Re: Configuration and IoC (Re: Proposed Roadmap for 1.3.x and beyond [long])

2004-11-22 Thread Don Brown
The bottom line is Struts now uses xml configuration as declarative configuration, rather than procedural. We define forms, actions, plugins, etc., without defining a process for using them. When you start looking at configuration for defining procedures, it can get messy quick - just look at

Re: Build with SVN

2004-11-22 Thread Dakota Jack
I suppose I am cracked, but I am getting an error in my build for Struts 1_2_6 because it does not find commons-collections.jar for org.apache.commons.collections.FastHashMap as well as, LazyDynaBean, LazyDynaMap, WrapDynaBean.getInstance(), and FastHashMap,. What's up? Thanks, Jack On Mon,

Re: Build with SVN

2004-11-22 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:11:30 -0800, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose I am cracked, but I am getting an error in my build for Struts 1_2_6 because it does not find commons-collections.jar for org.apache.commons.collections.FastHashMap as well as, LazyDynaBean, LazyDynaMap,

Re: Build with SVN

2004-11-22 Thread Craig McClanahan
Double check that you've got the latest BeanUtils code (1.7.0) in your build properties -- this has the lazy stuff plus FashHashMap, which was added to [beanutils] specifically so we could undo the linkage to [collections]. Craig On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:11:30 -0800, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32351] New: - Float validator can't validate the string with server dot

2004-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32351. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Build with SVN: add getLocalPort() to MultipartServletRequest?

2004-11-22 Thread Dakota Jack
Thanks for the assistance. I have a question and a request. Would it make sense to add getLocalPort to upload's MultipartServletRequest? That is the only thing keeping Struts from being compliant with Servlet 2.4 so far as I can tell. I am just putting this here because I know you are the man

Re: Build with SVN: add getLocalPort() to MultipartServletRequest?

2004-11-22 Thread Martin Cooper
Are you talking about MultipartRequestWrapper? If so, I guess that might make sense for the 1.2 branch. For 1.3, I expect much of the current upload code, including this class, will go away, and be replaced by a filter. I'm still working on the filter implementation for Commons FileUpload - I got

Re: Examples 1.2

2004-11-22 Thread Struts User
Well, I think the easiest way is to go to http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi to download the source. There is an example in there for you to look at. You can also download the binaries to run locally to see how it works. I hope this helps. Lee On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:09:32 -0600, Luis

Anyone Got a Servlet 2.3 handy for Struts Upload Build?

2004-11-22 Thread Dakota Jack
I am trying to build 1_2_6 and Struts upload requires something prior to Servlet 2.4. Does someone have a Servlet 2.2 or 2.3 around that I can use for the build? I would appreciate that. Just email it, if you do and would like to donate tot he cause. I really don't want to go searching around