DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30204] New: - README not up-to-date for deployement of included WAR files

2004-07-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30204. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Repository Reorg (Once More With Feeling)

2004-07-20 Thread Ted Husted
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:21:52 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: (BTW, that's something I think we should develop a policy on, so that we're not seen as making arbitrary decisions in this area, but that's another topic entirely.) I think the decision would have to depend on who is going to maintain the

Re: Repository Reorg (Once More With Feeling)

2004-07-20 Thread Ted Husted
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:07:14 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: One important question, though: Where are we doing 1.2.x development / maintenance? Are we leaving that in CVS and splitting off a new SVN repo for 2.0 development, or are we converting to SVN lock, stock and barrel? How about this: * On

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30188] - FileUpload does not work with i18n filenames.

2004-07-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30188. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Repository Reorg (Once More With Feeling)

2004-07-20 Thread Niall Pemberton
Does this include having Struts 1.x, 2.x, and 3.x, for the Servlet 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 respectively? Niall - Original Message - From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 1:15 PM Subject: Re: Repository Reorg (Once More With

Re: Repository Reorg (Once More With Feeling)

2004-07-20 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 06:53:04 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:21:52 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: (BTW, that's something I think we should develop a policy on, so that we're not seen as making arbitrary decisions in this area, but that's another topic entirely.)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30210] New: - Multipart forms processed in reset() method

2004-07-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30210. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: RequestProcessor

2004-07-20 Thread dev
Date: 2004-07-20T08:04:19 Editor: JamesChilders [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: RequestProcessor URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RequestProcessor no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1,3

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: RequestProcessor

2004-07-20 Thread dev
Date: 2004-07-20T08:06:19 Editor: JamesChilders [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: RequestProcessor URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RequestProcessor no comment Change Log: -- @@ -7,8

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29848] - Return appropriate status code when form validation fails

2004-07-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29848. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: PoweredBy

2004-07-20 Thread dev
Date: 2004-07-20T11:39:22 Editor: JamesChilders [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: PoweredBy URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/PoweredBy no comment Change Log: -- @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ *