DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31501] - html:form focus generates non-XHTML

2004-10-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31501. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: EddieBush

2004-10-31 Thread dev
Date: 2004-10-31T00:10:00 Editor: EddieBush [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: EddieBush URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EddieBush no comment Change Log: -- @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ *

svn commit: rev 56146 - struts/trunk/doc/stylesheets

2004-10-31 Thread martinc
Author: martinc Date: Sun Oct 31 10:37:11 2004 New Revision: 56146 Modified: struts/trunk/doc/stylesheets/struts.xsl Log: Add ApacheCon 2004 logo, as requested by ConCom. Modified: struts/trunk/doc/stylesheets/struts.xsl

Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions

2004-10-31 Thread Eddie Bush
That would be interesting. I've got a bit o' the Irish in meh (Me father's side) and ave always wanted to see Ireland first-hand. Next year, I might actually be in a position to travel for it. Eddie - Original Message - From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts

Fw: Mail Delivery Failure

2004-10-31 Thread Eddie Bush
Hey, could we oust this person? :-) I know Martin said a while back he thought he had done that. It appears the fix has yet to take. I actually tried to contact the postmaster, but never heard anything back, the last time around. Eddie - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31501] - html:form focus generates non-XHTML

2004-10-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31501. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Fw: Mail Delivery Failure

2004-10-31 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 15:59:20 -0600, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, could we oust this person? :-) I know Martin said a while back he thought he had done that. It appears the fix has yet to take. That change actually did work - the address was removed from the dev list. It turns out

JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]])

2004-10-31 Thread Martin Cooper
I hear what you're saying, Craig. However, I still feel that JSF doesn't buy me much when building highly dynamic apps. Some points to consider: * Since one of the goals of such apps is to minimise the number of full page refreshes, relatively little of the app can be constructed using tools such

Re: JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]])

2004-10-31 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Martin, you make an interesting comment that I think ties into this discussion (loosely ;) ) that is worth mentioning... A lot of the tools us architects and developers use these days really only make sense in cases where you have a separation of activities in terms of page authors and

Re: JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]])

2004-10-31 Thread Eddie Bush
I haven't found much need to utilize scriplets since the JSTL came along. Indeed, I feel pages are much cleaner and a great deal more legible if taglibs are used. I rarely, if ever, use anything except the JSTL though. One notable exception is Struts' own taglibs. I make other exceptions from

Re: JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]])

2004-10-31 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:30:22 -0600, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless Martin is incorrect about the way JSF handles requests, I'm inclined to believe (despite the fact JSF will be a part of the next specification) we might want to consider using something else under the covers in our

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31501] - html:form focus generates non-XHTML

2004-10-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31501. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.