wicket-spring enhancements

2009-11-10 Thread Kenny MacLeod
Hi there, I've been looking at the wicket-spring integration stuff, and I've come up with a couple of enhancements which I've found useful, and would be happy to contribute: 1) An enhanced SpringWebApplicationFactory which has the capability of creating and initializing its own Spring

Re: wicket-spring enhancements

2009-11-10 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
File a JIRA and attach the patch. At least that way they won't get lost. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Kenny MacLeod kenny.macl...@kizoom.comwrote: Hi there, I've been looking at the wicket-spring integration stuff, and I've come up

Re: Re: wicket-spring enhancements

2009-11-10 Thread bruno . borges
Kenny, if you need some help, let me know. Afterall I wan't to get myself back on the Wicket track. :-) Cheers, Bruno PS: Jeremy, how's the flip-flops? :-D

Re: wicket-spring enhancements

2009-11-10 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Kenny MacLeod kenny.macl...@kizoom.com wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Kenny MacLeod kenny.macl...@kizoom.com wrote: Hi there,  2) A modified AnnotProxyFieldValueFactory which gives the option of not creating CGLIB proxies for

Re: Re: wicket-spring enhancements

2009-11-10 Thread bruno . borges
I think this option can be applied if it deployment environment is checked. -- Bruno

Re: wicket-spring enhancements

2009-11-10 Thread Kenny MacLeod
Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Kenny MacLeod kenny.macl...@kizoom.com wrote: Hi there, 2) A modified AnnotProxyFieldValueFactory which gives the option of not creating CGLIB proxies for the injected Spring beans. In deployment environments where session serialization is

Re: wicket-spring enhancements

2009-11-10 Thread James Carman
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Kenny MacLeod kenny.macl...@kizoom.com wrote: I agree that it should be no means be the default setting, but in some cases you *know* your production environment does not serialize sessions. For example, we run in a JBoss cluster with Tomcat session

Re: remove MarkupContainer.isTransparentResolver

2009-11-10 Thread Erik van Oosten
Can we not use just this TransparentMarkupContainer and add the atrtibutemodifiers to that component? Erik. Juergen Donnerstag wrote: Yes, it is trivial. Just copy the code from the TransparentMarkupContainer (still on my disk). As another option: In 1.5 we removed the final keyword from

Re: remove MarkupContainer.isTransparentResolver

2009-11-10 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
Yes, that should do as well Juergen On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nl wrote: Can we not use just this TransparentMarkupContainer and add the atrtibutemodifiers to that component?   Erik. Juergen Donnerstag wrote: Yes, it is trivial. Just copy the code