Re: [Draft] Zeppelin Board report Oct 2020

Looks good On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:01 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > +1, Thanks moon > > moon soo Lee 于2020年10月15日周四 上午11:58写道： > >> Hi Folks, >> >> Since the report due date is 14/Oct, I made a draft of it. >> Please review this. >> >> ## Description: >> >> - Apache Zeppelin is a collaborative

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.9.0-preview2 (RC2)

+1 From: Jeff Zhang Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 7:29:22 AM To: users Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.9.0-preview2 (RC2) +1 Tested spark interpreter tutorial, flink interpreter tutorial. Prabhjyot Singh mailto:prabhjyotsi...@gmail.com>>

Re: [Announce] New Zeppelin Committer: Philipp Dallig

Congrats and welcome! From: Xun Liu Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2020 8:58:34 AM To: dev Cc: users ; philipp.dal...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Announce] New Zeppelin Committer: Philipp Dallig That's great news! Welcome aboard Philipp! :-) On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at

Re: Submitting code

suggested. Fork the repo, then share access. Open PR to merge bigger complete chunk when ready. This has been done many times in other projects. From: Xun Liu Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 8:12 AM To: Jongyoul Lee Cc: Felix Cheung; H GHOSH; Jeff Zhang; Morkovkin, Basil

Re: [discuss] Zeppelin support workflow

I like it! From: Jongyoul Lee Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 9:05:03 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [discuss] Zeppelin support workflow Thanks for the sharing this kind of discussion. I'm interested in it. Will see it. On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:43 AM Xun Liu wrote:

Season of Docs 2019

https://developers.google.com/season-of-docs/ Sounds like a good idea? Google announces the inaugural year of Season of Docs, a Google program that fosters collaboration between open source projects and technical writers. Season of Docs is similar to Summer of Code, but with a focus on open

Call for Presentations (CFP) is now open for ApacheCon North America in Las Vegas, September 9-13th

See the Big Data track or the Machine Learning track! We’re delighted to announce that the Call for Presentations (CFP) is now open for ApacheCon North America in Las Vegas, September 9-13th! As the official conference series of the ASF, ApacheCon North America will feature over a dozen Apache

Re: Zeppelin in GSOC 2019

Hi Xun, Thanks for your work - could you change the title of the email, I think you will get more attention to your ask to review the design. From: Xun Liu Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 12:03 AM To: Jongyoul Lee; m...@apache.org; Jeff Zhang; Vasiliy Morkovkin

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-4026) Doc should warn about anonymous access

Felix Cheung created ZEPPELIN-4026: -- Summary: Doc should warn about anonymous access Key: ZEPPELIN-4026 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-4026 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type

Re: Windows Supports

Testing on windows can also be done as CI on appveyer. I don’t completely get your comment on .cmd file though. Are you suggesting we don’t support windows and users can “run on windows” by basically running Linux in a virtual environment? Docker is one and there is Linux on Windows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.8.1 (RC1)

Thanks Jeff. I just tried to reach the rc1 tarball and realized its gone ;) From: Jeff Zhang Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 6:17 PM To: users; dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.8.1 (RC1) The vote is passed with 10 +1 ( 4 binding +1), Thanks

Re: Requested gitbox migration

Thanks! From: Jongyoul Lee Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 6:09:50 PM To: dev Subject: Requested gitbox migration Please check the link below: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17477 JL -- 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 http://madeng.net

Re: [DISCUSS] Make interpreters' repository

c 14, 2018 at 12:03 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > >> Agree with Felix, this is what I also concern in my last email. @Jongyoul >> Lee Could you explain more about how separate repo >> help here ? Thanks >> >> >> Felix Cheung 于2018年12月14日周五 上午11:00写道： >

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: [NOTICE] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org +1 for earlier. On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 22:46, Felix Cheung wrote: > Yes that’s all it takes to migrate. > > (And committers to setup gitbox link) > > Any more thoughts from the community? > > > ___

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox

it. On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:14 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > Hi Jongyoul - is this the same as the earlier thread? > > > > From: Jongyoul Lee > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 6:28 PM > To: dev > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox

Hi Jongyoul - is this the same as the earlier thread? From: Jongyoul Lee Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 6:28 PM To: dev Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox Hi, devs, I'd like to make a consensus to move our repository from git-wip to gitbox. Please give

Re: [DISCUSS] Make interpreters' repository

In my opinion, definitely a clean interface will be very useful and having a better way to test is good. But sounds to me like these should be possible without a code repo separation? The downside of separate repo (I assume still under ASF) is the spreading the attention of committers and

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: [NOTICE] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

ve any special reason not to move there. > > > > +1 for earlier > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 3:56 AM Felix Cheung > > wrote: > > > > > Hi community, > > > > > > The move to gitbox is coming. This does not affect Contributors - > m

Re: Zeppelin add hadoop submarine(machine learning framework) interpreter

Very cool! From: Jeff Zhang Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 7:14 AM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Re: Zeppelin add hadoop submarine(machine learning framework) interpreter Thanks xun. This would be a great addon for zeppelin to support deep learning. I

Re: [DISCUSS] ZEPPELIN-2619. Save note in [Title].zpln instead of [NOTEID]/note.json

Perhaps one concern is users having characters in note name that are invalid for file name/file path? From: Mohit Jaggi Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 6:02 PM To: us...@zeppelin.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ZEPPELIN-2619. Save note in [Title].zpln

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Zeppelin 0.8.0 released

Hmm... this is built automatically from the git tag when the release is official. We will need to investigate.. From: Krishna Pandey Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 3:26:46 PM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Zeppelin 0.8.0 released

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Zeppelin 0.8.0 released

Congrats and thanks for putting together the release From: Miquel Angel Andreu Febrer Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 11:02:20 PM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org Cc: us...@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Zeppelin 0.8.0 released Great news, It has

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-3469) Confusing behavior when running on Java 9

Felix Cheung created ZEPPELIN-3469: -- Summary: Confusing behavior when running on Java 9 Key: ZEPPELIN-3469 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3469 Project: Zeppelin Issue

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-3468) Undo paragraph change after find/replace erratic

Felix Cheung created ZEPPELIN-3468: -- Summary: Undo paragraph change after find/replace erratic Key: ZEPPELIN-3468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3468 Project: Zeppelin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.8.0 (RC2)

Tested and some observations / issues: - We should remove *.md5 from dist.apache.org before publishing (on the other hand, .md5 is needed for maven / repository.apache.org) - also this doc page has hardcoded versions (to 0.7.0), might also need a few more updates

Re: [DISCUSS] Adjust test logs for CI

bothersome for another developer. > >> > >> So it would be better to have a consensus to do our best to reduce my > >> logs, > >> especially made by test cases. > >> > >> How do you think of it? > >> > >> JL > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Adjust test logs for CI

Is there a way to do this via enable/disable component for logging in log4j? From: Jongyoul Lee Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 7:01:54 AM To: dev Subject: [DISCUSS] Adjust test logs for CI Hello contributors, I wonder how you guys think of

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-3385) PySpark interpreter should handle .. for autocomplete

Felix Cheung created ZEPPELIN-3385: -- Summary: PySpark interpreter should handle .. for autocomplete Key: ZEPPELIN-3385 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-3385 Project: Zeppelin

Re: Build zeppelin 0.8 with spark 2.3

Are you running with branch-0.8? I think there is a recent change in master for this. From: Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 9:49:10 AM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org; dev@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Re: Build zeppel

Re: Build zeppelin 0.8 with spark 2.3

Spark 2.3 does not support Scala 2.10. There should be a script to switch Zeppelin to build for Scala 2.11 only... From: Xiaohui Liu Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 9:20:13 PM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Build zeppelin 0.8 with spark 2.3

Re: [Discussion] 0.8.0 Release

+1 From: Jeff Zhang Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 3:36:20 PM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discussion] 0.8.0 Release I will update that jira, and anyone can link jiras that he think is critical for 0.8.0, but it is not

Re: [DISCUSS] Increase a few numbers in source code

Thanks! They look reasonable to me. Please feel free to open a PR From: Belousov Maksim Eduardovich Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2017 5:20:02 AM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Increase a few numbers in source code Hello,

Re: [DISCUSS] Change some default settings for avoiding unintended usages

but I don't think it's the part of this issue directly. Let's talk about this issue with another email. I want to talk about enabling authentication by default. If it's enabled, we should login admin/password1 at the beginning. How do you think of it? On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Felix Cheung

Re: [DISCUSS] Review process

meant is we don't have to wait for all kind of PRs. On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: > +1 > What would be the rough heuristic people will be comfortable with- > what is small and what is big? > > _

Re: [DISCUSS] Review process

manage the delay time of > > merging a pull request > > > > El 18 dic. 2017 18:03, "Felix Cheung" <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> > > escribió: > > > > > I think it is still useful to have a time delay after one approve since > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Review process

I think it is still useful to have a time delay after one approve since often time there are very feedback and updates after one committer approval. Also github has a tab for all PRs you are subscribed to, it shouldn’t be very hard to review all the approved ones again.

Re: [DISCUSS] Change some default settings for avoiding unintended usages

cript through python and Scala. Shell is just an example. Using docker looks good but it cannot avoid unindented usage of resources like mining coin. On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com<mailto:felixcheun...@hotmail.com>> wrote: > I don’t

Re: [DISCUSS] Change some default settings for avoiding unintended usages

I don’t think that’s limited to the shell interpreter. You can run any arbitrary program or script from python or Scala (or java) as well. _ From: Jeff Zhang Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 4:00 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Change some default

Re: Official Docker image build and release process

Anyone? From: Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 8:45:07 AM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Official Docker image build and release process Hi! Where do we have information on this? Thanks

Official Docker image build and release process

Hi! Where do we have information on this? Thanks

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.7.3

+1 From: Park Hoon <1am...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8:37:16 AM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.7.3 +1 On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 00:21 moon soo Lee wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:05 AM

Re: New committer: Park Hoon

Congrats! From: astros...@gmail.com on behalf of Hyung Sung Shim Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 9:10:12 AM To: dev Subject: Re: New committer: Park Hoon Congratulations!!! 2017-06-22 20:56 GMT+09:00 Jeff Zhang

Re: Contributing to Apache Zeppelin

Hi welcome! Please feel free to open JIRA and add a comment that you are working on it - there is no need to wait to have the JIRA assigned to you to start. _ From: Marco Tagliabue > Sent:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.2 (RC1)

+1 netinst Check sig, basic tests _ From: Jongyoul Lee > Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 2:13 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.2 (RC1) To: dev >

Re: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building and releasing Zeppelin

rs into maven separately. We already had a install-interpreter script inside it. If someone wants to install specific interpreter not included in default release package, they can use that script to install specific one. On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com&l

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.7.2

+1 From: moon soo Lee Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 10:47:39 AM To: dev Subject: [DISCUSS] Release 0.7.2 Hi, Since 0.7.1 release, we have resolved 38 issues and that includes most of critical issues in 0.7.2 umbrella issue [1]. Since 0.7.1 has

Re: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building and releasing Zeppelin

Are we proposing some interpreters to be built and released separately? Is this going to be separate packaging? Or separate release pipeline? _ From: Jongyoul Lee > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 11:04 PM Subject: [DISCUSS]

Re: Permission denied: user=zeppelin while using %spark.pyspark interpreter in AWS EMR cluster

Seems to be with hdfs ACL - does the service user Zeppelin have access to your storage? From: BigData Consultant Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 10:56:31 PM To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org; us...@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Permission

Re: New committer: Hyungsung Shim, Jeff Zhang, Chaesung Lim, Khalid Huseynov

Congrats and welcome! From: moon soo Lee Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 1:36:24 PM To: dev Subject: New committer: Hyungsung Shim, Jeff Zhang, Chaesung Lim, Khalid Huseynov The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Zeppelin has invited

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.1 (RC3)

+1 Tested bin, checked signature, ran through a bunch of tests, checked report mode, UI etc I don't think it's a blocker: When I search I see a list of note names but with empty white boxes under each of them. Isn't it suppose to show where the match is found?

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

2.0.0-preview.html On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:31 PM Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com<mailto:jongy...@gmail.com>> wrote: I agree that it will help prolong RC period and use it actually. And also we need code freeze for the new features and spend time to stabilize RC. On Tue, Mar 21,

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

ures. And with subsequent minor release, 0.8.1, 0.8.2 ... moment we feel confident about the quality, release it as a 1.0.0 instead of 0.8.x. Once we have 1.0.0 released, then I think we can make larger, experimental changes on 2.0.0 branch aggressively, while we keep maintaining 1.

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

There are several pending visualization improvements/PRs that would be very good to get them in as well. From: Jongyoul Lee Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 9:03:24 PM To: dev; us...@zeppelin.apache.org Subject: Roadmap for 0.8.0 Hi dev &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC4)

It's very strange - tested with netinst and as previous RC, in the tutorial, the Martial status drop down box doesn't trigger rerun of the query, works when manually clicking run. I double checked to make sure. Could someone else check? _ From: Jongyoul Lee

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2058) Reduce test matrix on Travis

Felix Cheung created ZEPPELIN-2058: -- Summary: Reduce test matrix on Travis Key: ZEPPELIN-2058 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2058 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type: Bug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC2)

I'm seeing the same behavior with the marital status drop down box on the intro notebook on netinst build. I think this could be a bigger problem. _ From: Khalid Huseynov > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 8:08 PM Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

Thanks. I'd incline to agree having latest matplotlib broken with python (python interpreter) seems like a big inconvenience. Is there a workaround? Let's discuss a bit in the JIRA and bring this back to the vote thread. Also we should really try to mark JIRA too to be included in RC builds,

Re: Unstable travis CI recently

I'd agree. Is there a course of actions you can propose? Disable all these tests is a not a long term solution, right? _ From: Jeff Zhang > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 6:01 PM Subject: Re: Unstable travis CI recently To:

Re: Windows support ?

No, Travis does not support Windows https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2104 AppVeyor does... https://www.appveyor.com/docs/installed-software/#operating-system From: Jeff Zhang Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 7:04:18 PM To:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.6.2 (RC2)

+1 Tested source and netinstall Thanks Mina! _ From: Ahyoung Ryu > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 5:28 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.6.2 (RC2) To:

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

Seems like we have a couple of good fixes. +1 for another release On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:53 PM -0700, "Ahyoung Ryu" > wrote: +1 On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Prabhjyot Singh wrote: > +1 > > On 8 Oct 2016

Re: How Apache Zeppelin runs a paragraph

Great post! On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:56 PM -0700, "Jongyoul Lee" > wrote: Hello DuyHai, Thanks for the fixing the typo. I've fixed it. Concerning the debugging, I think writing posts or updating wiki would be better. I'm willing to write a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Zeppelin release 0.6.1 (rc2)

+1 Tested out binaries and netinstall, with spark and a few other interpreters. Thanks Mina! _ From: Alexander Bezzubov > Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2016 12:05 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Zeppelin release 0.6.1 (rc2) To:

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.1 release

Don't we need the official Spark 2.0.0 artifacts in maven central repo to official release support for it? On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 5:39 PM -0700, "Vinay Shukla" > wrote: We should not wait. I anticipate Spark 2.0 to be officially

Re: Zeppelin 0.6.0 on CDH 5.7.1

: Benjamin Kim <bbuil...@gmail.com<mailto:bbuil...@gmail.com>> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 9:17 PM Subject: Re: Zeppelin 0.6.0 on CDH 5.7.1 To: Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com<mailto:felixcheun...@hotmail.com>> Cc: <dev@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:dev@zepp

Zeppelin 0.6.0 on CDH 5.7.1

(Thread.java:745) Thanks for helping. Ben On Jul 8, 2016, at 10:47 PM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com<mailto:felixcheun...@hotmail.com>> wrote: For #1, do you know if Spark can find the Hive metastore config (typically in hive-site.xml) - Spark's log should indicate that

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Zeppelin 0.6.0 released

Is this possibly caused by CDH requiring a build-from-source instead of the official binary releases? On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:22 PM -0700, "Benjamin Kim" > wrote: Moon, My environmental setup consists of an 18 node CentOS 6.7 cluster with 24

Re: [VOTE] Apache Zeppelin release 0.6.0 (rc1)

thub.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1013 [2] http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.6.0-SNAPSHOT/manual/interpreterinstallation.html [3] http://apache-zeppelin-users-incubating-mailing-list.75479.x6.nabble.com/Ask-opinion-regarding-0-6-0-release-package-tc3298.html Regards, Mina On Fri, Jul 1, 2016

Re: [VOTE] Apache Zeppelin release 0.6.0 (rc1)

+1 ... Or 0? (For netinst) Tested: source build hash ok spark flink python binaries release - zeppelin-0.6.0-bin-netinst spark pyspark ISSUE - %md is not setup "Interpreter md not found” %sh is not setup "Interpreter sh not found" No Interpreter tab to set Spark interpreter config? On Thu,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Zeppelin 0.6.0 Release

> > >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:09 PM Vinay Shukla <vinayshu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Agree, let's make our first release as a TLP. > >> > >> On Wednesday, May 25, 2016, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> > >> w