On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Tomáš Smetana wrote:
>
> I tend to use systemd-nspawn containers for building rpms. So for example,
> I
> have a Fedora 24 system and use its dnf to create e.g. Centos 7 container
> root and then build Centos rpms from within that container.
# Fedora QA Devel Meeting
# Date: 2016-01-18
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net
The agenda looks much like last week for some reason. I'd like to
get the process of having disposable clients in production
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, David Shea wrote:
> Does anyone know how to contact Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams? I've been trying
> to contact him in regards to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287273, and have also tried
> contacting him via the email address in
On 18 Jan 2016 06:33, "Igor Gnatenko" wrote:
>
> I hope Heiko Adams and Reindl Harald should co-operate and write usable
and bug free package manager.
>
> Related to topic: Please prepare full list of bugs which you think
critical for you and write to each how to
I hope Heiko Adams and Reindl Harald should co-operate and write usable and
bug free package manager.
Related to topic: Please prepare full list of bugs which you think critical
for you and write to each how to reproduce it.
P.S. autoremove works here fine (fresh 23).
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298628
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBD-SQLite-1.48-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-745ec448de
--
You are receiving this mail
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 06:13:39PM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
> I would like to update perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel on EPEL 5 to the version
> that EPEL 6 has. The requirement of perl(Crypt::RC4) gets satisfied with
> this update:
>
>
On 17 January 2016 at 09:44, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Just curious: how can a metainfo.xml file be validated?
> I tried to use also appstream-util validate-relax, but it always fail:
> $ appstream-util validate-relax blenderplayer.metainfo.xml
> blenderplayer.metainfo.xml:
On 17 January 2016 at 19:51, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Do also addons metainfo.xml files need to be validated in .spec file? I
> can't find anything about that on Packaging Guidelines.
Up to you; Kalev did try and get this validation automatic when
building rpms in koji.
for localupdate i switched back to yum-deprecated long ago, but for
ordinary kernel updates pretend unsolved deps is simply unacceptable
*no* i am not the only one - see karma comments for 4.3.3-300.fc23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888#c14
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2016, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> > may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch back to yum?
> >
> > ongoing problems in the core-task solve dependencies is not
> > production
> > ready AND
Am 17.01.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:27:02 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
for localupdate i switched back to yum-deprecated long ago, but for
ordinary kernel updates pretend unsolved deps is simply unacceptable
*no* i am not the only one -
Il 17/01/2016 18:58, Richard Hughes ha scritto:
Are you using non-breaking UTF-8 spaces perhaps? Have a look in vim
and see if it has lots of control chars showing. At the moment even
xmllint won't validate it. Richard.
Thanks, yes. That was the problem.
Using validate-relax now is ok.
Do
Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2016, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch back to yum?
>
> ongoing problems in the core-task solve dependencies is not
> production
> ready AND REMOVE THE DEPRECATED WARNINGS for "package-cleanup" and
>
kpmcore is now built in Rawhide.
Can I move ahead and retire KPMcore or should I wait some time before
doing that?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:42:07PM +0530, Kushal Das wrote:
> On 16/01/16, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Micro Bit =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Micro_Bit
> > >
> > > Change
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:27:02 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> for localupdate i switched back to yum-deprecated long ago, but for
> ordinary kernel updates pretend unsolved deps is simply unacceptable
>
> *no* i am not the only one - see karma comments for 4.3.3-300.fc23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285437
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.15-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285437
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.15-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299286
Bug ID: 1299286
Summary: perl-Test-Strict-0.36 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Strict
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299283
Bug ID: 1299283
Summary: perl-podlators-4.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-podlators
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299283
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1115704
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1115704=edit
[patch] Update to 4.05 (#1299283)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299287
Bug ID: 1299287
Summary: perl-System-Command-1.117 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-System-Command
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.01.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
>>
>> I'd encourage you to re-read our code of conduct
>> ( https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct ) and try and be more
>> respectful in bugs and here. We are all trying
Am 18.01.2016 um 00:48 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:01:13 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
...snip...
"dnf update *.rpm" is the way which has to work
Why? It works fine as a install. It's installing a new kernel, since
kernels can have many versions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299283
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12588607
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
820 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893
libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
584 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
434
On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 00:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2016, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> > > may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch back to
> > > yum?
> > >
> > > ongoing
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:01:13 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
...snip...
> "dnf update *.rpm" is the way which has to work
Why? It works fine as a install. It's installing a new kernel, since
kernels can have many versions installed at a time it makes more sense
for it to be
Am Montag, den 18.01.2016, 00:00 +0100 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2016, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> > > may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch back to
> > > yum?
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:55:54AM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote:
> But it seems to be broken since Feb 2015, which is IMHO unacceptable
> since a default package manager and all of its features have to work
> absolutely reliable.
When was the last time you saw a program bigger then /bin/true that was
Am 18.01.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.01.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
I'd encourage you to re-read our code of conduct
( https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct ) and try and be more
respectful
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:53:00 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
...snip...
>
> why?
>
> because you don't type "dnf install kernel" instead "dnf upgrade" and
> "kernel-headers" *is never installed* in multiple versions
Sure, you want upgrade/update to update installonly pkgs
Just curious: how can a metainfo.xml file be validated?
I tried to use also appstream-util validate-relax, but it always fail:
$ appstream-util validate-relax blenderplayer.metainfo.xml
blenderplayer.metainfo.xml: failed to parse blenderplayer.metainfo.xml:
Errore alla riga 2 carattere 2: Il
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/17/2016 12:08 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 01/16/2016 03:44 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> OpenMPI Fortran compiler detection fails during
>>
Compose started at Sun Jan 17 05:15:02 UTC 2016
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
53d79b47a33cb8e5f656cb0f9d6d6817 Software-License-0.103011.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Software-License/Software-License-0.103011.tar.gz/md5/53d79b47a33cb8e5f656cb0f9d6d6817/Software-License-0.103011.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 1d52ca601c07dabb6d0b92eee3120535124b2c06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:37:34 +
Subject: Update to 0.103011
- New upstream release 0.103011
- Do not load Sub::Install, since it isn't used!
- Eliminate superfluous FULL STOP
From 1d52ca601c07dabb6d0b92eee3120535124b2c06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:37:34 +
Subject: Update to 0.103011
- New upstream release 0.103011
- Do not load Sub::Install, since it isn't used!
- Eliminate superfluous FULL STOP
> eclipse-findbugs (richardfearn)
Fixed - thanks!
Richard
--
Richard Fearn
richardfe...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297527
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WWW-Twilio-API-0.18-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160116:
Design_suite live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cinnamon live i386
Mate live i386
Workstation disk raw
From 8178fb4e5d08d04d7d12a41bb37d5d0a3369d256 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Bridon
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 16:24:36 +0800
Subject: =?UTF-8?q?The=C2=A0package=C2=A0was=C2=A0approved=C2=A0in=C2=A0Fe?=
=?UTF-8?q?dora.?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
From 91b62de8f05f0848bb9fc9ef4cd3e2f0fc379b35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Scheck
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:37:31 +0100
Subject: Add compatibility for RHEL 5 (BuildRoot)
---
perl-Crypt-RC4.spec | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git
From 7d1c47054ed883a31ccf7f3eed1b0160ccf61522 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Bridon
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:19:24 +0800
Subject: Initial packaging of perl-Crypt-RC4.
This was submitted for review in Fedora on Mon Jun 27 2011:
a look, you can get the failing
image at:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20160117/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/boot.iso
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailin
On 16/01/16, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Micro Bit =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Micro_Bit
> >
> > Change owner(s):
> > * Kushal Das
> >
> > Enable the use of BBC Micro Bit on
Hello Paul,
I would like to update perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel on EPEL 5 to the version
that EPEL 6 has. The requirement of perl(Crypt::RC4) gets satisfied with
this update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-70c923f5af
EPEL 5 has currently 0.3200-2.el5, while EPEL 6 has
On 16/01/16 21:54 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
Jonathan,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
How soon will you be doing the rebuilds?
gazebo also needs to be rebuilt for Boost 1.60, which I'm currently
doing in the f24-boost side tag. If you're
On 16/01/16 13:34 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Here are a small collection of subject lines of emails sent
automatically to me by various Fedora systems in the past few days:
Subject: upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2015-850e89be8b
Subject: [Fedora Update] [comment]
Hello list,
A while ago, I've created a Whirlpool hash function library [1] based on
the original implementation of Whirlpool algorithm by Vincent Rijmen and
Paulo S. L. M. Barreto.
It's packaged as 'libwhirlpool' in Fedora and EPEL [2].
Also provides 'whirlpoolsum' utility to calculate and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285437
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285437
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.15-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
53 matches
Mail list logo