Notification time stamped 2018-06-29 05:57:03 UTC
From 374319de2ac26b6fac512dc6c56eef8af2dce237 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 29 2018 05:56:58 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Ref-Util-XS.spec b/perl-Ref-Util-XS.spec
index 2c92e86..17e201a
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:49:39PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 02:37:07PM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > If we're keeping both commands, I don't really care - but to make
> > sure I'm understanding this, we're proposing to eliminate the yum
> > code, create a symlink
Notification time stamped 2018-06-29 05:33:06 UTC
From a429c934fc6670374c289d159d32c0e83eee5f48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 29 2018 05:33:03 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Cookie-Baker.spec b/perl-Cookie-Baker.spec
index 0436c84..5aa8615
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/06/29/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.11-20180628git08b2d88.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 06/28/2018 11:43 PM, Alois Mahdal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so I'm following "Join the package collection maintainers", I'm at the
> late phase when I've submitted new package, ran `fedpkg build` from
> master, koji is happy, etc.
>
>
>
On 28/06/18 14:09 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:25 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I've been keeping the lights on in this package for years since the maintainer
(ravenoak) vanished from Fedora. However, it doesn't build against Python 3.7
(works fine with 3.6) and I don't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596422
Bug ID: 1596422
Summary: perl-Carton-v1.0.34 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Carton
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 20:41 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> sergiomb opencv
/builddir/build/BUILD/opencv-3.4.1/modules/python/src2/cv2.cpp:889:34:
error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' [-fpermissive]
char* str = PyString_AsString(obj);
This problem is not about new gcc
Notification time stamped 2018-06-28 22:26:37 UTC
From 9421dcb48ec50d9546c084c5894dcdde6a853e97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 28 2018 22:26:35 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.spec
b/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.spec
Notification time stamped 2018-06-28 22:09:59 UTC
From 5a25c830016459458aa04ac7d2a7de029c23009e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 28 2018 22:09:57 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-List-MoreUtils-XS.spec b/perl-List-MoreUtils-XS.spec
index
On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 18:13 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:58:55PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > Maybe run the following? Not sure. Hard to find docs on this.
> > fedpkg request-branch f28
>
> Documented here:
>
>
On 28.6.2018 15:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The Python 3.7 rebuild in the f29-python side tag is currently:
- 2168 built
- ~170 FTBFS
- ~120 blocked by dependencies that FTBFS
Ideally, this would all get fixed before the merge, but that's
unrealistic, there are packages that are FTBFS for
On 28.6.2018 15:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The Python 3.7 rebuild in the f29-python side tag is currently:
- 2168 built
- ~170 FTBFS
- ~120 blocked by dependencies that FTBFS
Ideally, this would all get fixed before the merge, but that's
unrealistic, there are packages that are FTBFS for
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:58:55PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> Maybe run the following? Not sure. Hard to find docs on this.
> fedpkg request-branch f28
Documented here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fedrepo-req-to-fedpkg
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
Hello, Gerald.
Sorry for late reply, I managed to catch up with this thread only now.
On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 18:01, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:56 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 07:54, Gerald B.
On 06/28/2018 03:42 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The Python 3.7 rebuild in the f29-python side tag is currently:
- 2168 built
- ~170 FTBFS
- ~120 blocked by dependencies that FTBFS
Ideally, this would all get fixed before the merge, but that's
unrealistic, there are packages that are FTBFS
On jeudi 28 juin 2018 23:43:09 CEST Alois Mahdal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so I'm following "Join the package collection maintainers", I'm at the
> late phase when I've submitted new package, ran `fedpkg build` from
> master, koji is happy, etc.
>
>
>
Maybe run the following? Not sure. Hard to find docs on this.
fedpkg request-branch f28
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 5:51 PM Alois Mahdal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so I'm following "Join the package collection maintainers", I'm at the
> late phase when I've submitted new package, ran `fedpkg build` from
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 02:37:07PM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> If we're keeping both commands, I don't really care - but to make
> sure I'm understanding this, we're proposing to eliminate the yum
> code, create a symlink for yum pointing to dnf and then change our
> documentation to no longer
Hi,
so I'm following "Join the package collection maintainers", I'm at the
late phase when I've submitted new package, ran `fedpkg build` from
master, koji is happy, etc.
Notification time stamped 2018-06-28 20:50:41 UTC
From 53ca6ae67fa002a601d1b5813506e20a3ab0da9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 28 2018 20:50:35 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Net-LDAP-Server-Test.spec b/perl-Net-LDAP-Server-Test.spec
index
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:45:06PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> > To tie two recent devel list threads, this is a perfect use case for
> > a ~/bin being first in PATH: a ~/bin/yum -> /bin/dnf symlink for
> > those that don't want to
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:45:06PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> To tie two recent devel list threads, this is a perfect use case for
> a ~/bin being first in PATH: a ~/bin/yum -> /bin/dnf symlink for
> those that don't want to rewrite scripts.
As I understand it, regardless of which one we
On 06/28/2018 08:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 01:29:41PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
But in Fedora land, we've spent several years selling the message "yum
is gone and replaced with this new thing called dnf". It would be
rather confusing to suddenly start selling the
There will be an outage starting at 2018-07-03 21:00UTC, which will
last approximately 6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-07-03 21:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
There have been a set up of updates
ICU4J is now covered by the Unicode License (with MIT and BSD licensed
contributed parts.)
The Unicode license is very similar to the previous MIT-style ICU license.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel-announce mailing list --
ICU4J is now covered by the Unicode License (with MIT and BSD licensed
contributed parts.)
The Unicode license is very similar to the previous MIT-style ICU license.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
___
devel-announce mailing list --
There will be an outage starting at 2018-07-02 21:00UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-07-02 21:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
There have been a set up of updates
On jeudi 28 juin 2018 22:05:36 CEST Antonio Trande wrote:
> Does anyone know how to fix 'antimony'?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594496
>
> Reply from upstream is delayed...
>
> On 28/06/2018 20:41, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > This is a reminder that your package FTBFS with Python
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:06 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
> Does anyone know how to fix 'antimony'?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594496
The code has 2 problems. One is simply a missing "const" keyword,
easy to fix. The other problem is that the Qt authors apparently
thought it
Notification time stamped 2018-06-28 20:18:09 UTC
From 3246659a85d9081f4cc0fd4202a216c2da504817 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 28 2018 20:18:05 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Net-LDAP-Server.spec b/perl-Net-LDAP-Server.spec
index
CCing the maintainers of pyCXX.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 4:10 PM Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:25 PM Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > I've been keeping the lights on in this package for years since the
> maintainer (ravenoak) vanished from Fedora. However, it doesn't build
>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:25 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I've been keeping the lights on in this package for years since the
> maintainer (ravenoak) vanished from Fedora. However, it doesn't build against
> Python 3.7 (works fine with 3.6) and I don't have the cycles to dig into it.
>
> If
Does anyone know how to fix 'antimony'?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594496
Reply from upstream is delayed...
On 28/06/2018 20:41, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> This is a reminder that your package FTBFS with Python 3.7. Please fix
> it. We'd like to merge the side tag soon and your
On 06/28/2018 03:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
To answer the ecosystem question... if I were an EL shop that had been
using yum and writing scripts to interact with yum for years, and then
I had to rewrite all of my scripts and retrain my muscle memory to
call a new command that had similar semantics
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 3:24 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:51 PM Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>>
>> > When FESCo decided to approve that change to the original plan, this
>> > was noted as a potential risk. I
I've been keeping the lights on in this package for years since the
maintainer (ravenoak) vanished from Fedora. However, it doesn't build
against Python 3.7 (works fine with 3.6) and I don't have the cycles to dig
into it.
If someone steps up to fix the FTBFS, I'm willing to hang on as a
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:51 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
> > When FESCo decided to approve that change to the original plan, this
> > was noted as a potential risk. I personally think that staying aligned
> > with the rest of the RH distro
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 02:54:05PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > When FESCo decided to approve that change to the original plan, this
> > was noted as a potential risk. I personally think that staying aligned
> > with the rest of the RH distro ecosystem is worth some inconvenience.
> > It'll make
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:51 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 01:29:41PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > But in Fedora land, we've spent several years selling the message "yum
> > is gone and replaced with this new thing called dnf". It would be
> > rather confusing to
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 01:29:41PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> But in Fedora land, we've spent several years selling the message "yum
> is gone and replaced with this new thing called dnf". It would be
> rather confusing to suddenly start selling the message "oh hey yum is
> back only now it's
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
> DNF shouldn't diverge from YUM just "because we can".
> We're fixing some obvious differences that weren't introduced for any good
> reason.
>
> There will be no special compat layer just a yum -> dnf symlink.
> If the compatibility is
> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
MH> What is the criterion to merge the side tag?
I think ultimately that's up to you, but certainly the idea is to
balance disruption (breaking builds or rawhide usability) against
holding back progress (the approved python 3.7 feature).
It would certainly be
> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
MH> What is the criterion to merge the side tag?
I think ultimately that's up to you, but certainly the idea is to
balance disruption (breaking builds or rawhide usability) against
holding back progress (the approved python 3.7 feature).
It would certainly be
After modifying the script to strip comments and running it against the
most recent version of rawhide on my local mirror, I found that abrt,
pcsc-cyberjack and slic3r dropped off the list. But I found that libdnf
actually appeared on the list when it wasn't before.. I checked the
package and
> "TH" == Till Hofmann writes:
TH> Not strictly a script error: I already updated most of my packages
TH> without rebuilding them, so they are all false positives.
That's fine. I could exclude those but I don't know which they are and
the benefit would be pretty low.
TH> I guess I'm not
Thanks for the response and sorry for taking so long to reply.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:05 PM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> Jeff Backus wrote:
> > Hmm.. Yes, we've had discussions within the SIG re: window managers that
> > support i586/i686, and KDE was on the list of WMs that no longer support
> >
On 06/28/2018 06:42 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Stuff that doesn't build and sounds important:
- ceph (also FTBFS in regular rawhide)
- libreoffice (also FTBFS in regular rawhide)
- orca (blocked by pyatspi, looking at it ATM)
- kernel-tools
For kernel-tools, it depends on your definition
Hi, we've got some issues that were resolved[1] and I was wondering if
anyone could give me a bit better idea when would it make into copr?
[1] bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580435
fixed: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/commit/f2282d6
Regards,
Radka
Notification time stamped 2018-06-28 16:00:38 UTC
From 3f5f44a9cba351bb5ef0cd31fa3c365c6a15fae5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 28 2018 16:00:36 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index 26163ef..b8b26e0 100644
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594473
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594993
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Event-RPC-1.10-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595972
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Event-RPC-1.10-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595716
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593043
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.68-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592742
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.68-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594468
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.68-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595713
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.68-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594219
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
ack-2.24-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 20:30 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> usbipjdieter
Fixed in git for F28+
Jonathan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On jeudi 28 juin 2018 03:30:34 CEST Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> eclipseo libfilteraudio webkit2-sharp
Done for me on F28+.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
18 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7948d6772e
ansible-2.5.5-1.el6
3
>
>
> williamjmorenor python-rows
>
>
Done
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
Hi,
On 26-06-18 15:19, Radka Janekova wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>>wrote:
Hi,
On 25-06-18 13:26, Radka Janekova wrote:
ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife#Current_status
The Python 3.7 rebuild in the f29-python side tag is currently:
- 2168 built
- ~170 FTBFS
- ~120 blocked by dependencies that FTBFS
Ideally, this would all get fixed before the merge, but that's
unrealistic, there are packages that are FTBFS for unrelated reasons, etc.
What is the
The Python 3.7 rebuild in the f29-python side tag is currently:
- 2168 built
- ~170 FTBFS
- ~120 blocked by dependencies that FTBFS
Ideally, this would all get fixed before the merge, but that's
unrealistic, there are packages that are FTBFS for unrelated reasons, etc.
What is the
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:35 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 18:18 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:30 PM Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 16:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 02:54:07PM +0200,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591449
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||Github
|
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
> Jan Kurik writes:
>
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_YUM_3
>>
>>
>> Owner(s):
>> * Daniel Mach
>>
>>
>> Remove yum (v3) and all related packages from Fedora.
>>
Hi Dave, Hi Florian,
Right - there is a new annobin rpm available - annobin-8.0-1.el8 - which
has these changes:
* Weak symbols are not generated by the annobin plugin
when compiling with -ffunction-sections.
There was no point really. Linker garbage collection will not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595972
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594993
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593043
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595713
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594468
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.68-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592742
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594219
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
Notification time stamped 2018-06-28 12:00:53 UTC
From 3dd861045793ce0629efd54dc71f1db7617cfbcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 28 2018 12:00:51 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical.spec b/perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical.spec
index
Dne 27.6.2018 v 13:44 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> So is it actually possible to use DNF to prepare bootstrap buildroot
> containing YUM from RHEL and then the buildroot itself being managed by
> YUM? Last time I tried to come up with setup like this I failed
> (rhbz#1467314) ...
Right. Still not
Dne 28.6.2018 v 02:00 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> How about changing the default config to use DNF instead? Last I checked,
> the tenor was that it should work and that you just prefer using YUM 3 to
> ensure the results are the same as when running mock on an EL machine, but
> if YUM 3 is not
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 06:28:53AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:19 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> > El mié, 27-06-2018 a las 11:58 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > escribió:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to pick up the process of converting fedora-release from
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 15/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180625.n.0):
ID: 253004 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_update_cli
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/253004
ID: 253013 Test: i386
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596132
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
Notification time stamped 2018-06-28 10:29:29 UTC
From e8b13c9ec0f81b403793e064c5e21294bf9ffd15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 28 2018 10:29:25 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec
index
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:19 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El mié, 27-06-2018 a las 11:58 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to pick up the process of converting fedora-release from a
> > split "upstream"/"downstream" model into a single repo in src.fp.o.
> >
>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 3:34 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El jue, 14-06-2018 a las 12:06 +0200, Jan Kurik escribió:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefault
[snip]
>> Fedora already has a lot of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591449
Cedric Buissart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1596133, 1596135, 1596134
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596132
Cedric Buissart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1591449 (CVE-2018-10860)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591449
Cedric Buissart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1596131, 1596132
--- Comment #7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596132
--- Comment #1 from Cedric Buissart ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure that all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591449
Cedric Buissart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Group|security, qe_staff |
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596132
Bug ID: 1596132
Summary: CVE-2018-10860 perl-Archive-Zip: Directory traversal
in Archive::Zip [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 28
Component: perl-Archive-Zip
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19.6.2018 11:27, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 13.6.2018 15:14, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>>> I've just started to build the bootstrap sequence in a side tag
>>> (f29-python).
>>>
>>>
>> I'm now mass rebuilding everything. Will do a couple of
On 06/28/2018 03:30 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> In Fedora 28 and newer, it is no longer necessary for most packages
> which install shared libraries to have scriptlets which call ldconfig:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#Shared_Libraries
>
> For your convenience, I
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180625.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180627.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:18
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 17
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 189
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 66.71 MiB
Size of dropped packages:
= Proposed System Wide Change: CJK Default Fonts To Noto =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CJKDefaultFontsToNoto
Owner(s):
* Akira TAGOH
* Peng Wu
Changes the default fonts for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (CJK)
languages to Google Noto.
== Detailed description ==
This proposal
= Proposed System Wide Change: CJK Default Fonts To Noto =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CJKDefaultFontsToNoto
Owner(s):
* Akira TAGOH
* Peng Wu
Changes the default fonts for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (CJK)
languages to Google Noto.
== Detailed description ==
This proposal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594993
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Event-RPC-1.10-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fb8982959e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595972
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Event-RPC-1.10-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1e3a1eca9d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595972
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Event-RPC-1.10-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fb8982959e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
