Fedora-Cloud-33-20210223.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210222.0): ID: 786468 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-02-23 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/02/23/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210223git1c6adb372.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: help with building nextcloud-client

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 6:46 PM Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > I am trying to update nextcloud-client to 3.1.3. Build keeps failing > with this - > > /builddir/build/BUILD/desktop-3.1.3/src/gui/cloudproviders/cloudprovidermanager.cpp:15:1: > note: 'extern "C"' linkage started here > 15 | extern

help with building nextcloud-client

Hi, I am trying to update nextcloud-client to 3.1.3. Build keeps failing with this - /builddir/build/BUILD/desktop-3.1.3/src/gui/cloudproviders/cloudprovidermanager.cpp:15:1: note: 'extern "C"' linkage started here 15 | extern "C" { Can someone please explain how I can fix this

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34

On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 10:49 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: > >    # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules >    # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > again >   

License field correction: giada changed from “GPLv3+” to “GPLv3+ and […]”

I rescued the giada package after it was orphaned and have updated it to the latest upstream release, using the new CMake build system. The package now properly documents its pre-existing bundled dependencies (four direct and many indirect). Accordingly, the License field has changed from

Re: PA module support in PipeWire

Lóránt Perger wrote: > I would like to ask about the developers' stance towards supporting > PulseAudio plugins when using `pipewire-pulseaudio`. On some other > mainstream distributions this can easily be achieved as the modules are > packaged with the PA pipewire replacement package, however, in

Re: Don't update to the latest f33!

No problem - I need to know this. Thanks! -- * David P. Both, RHCE He/Him/His * www.both.org - My personal web site www.Linux-Databook.info - Home of the DataBook for Linux

Re: [dns-sig] Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Is there some reason systemd-resolved cannot be a subpackage? Seems > like that would be the easiest solution? +1 to making this a subpackage. I really don't see why this has to be part of the main systemd package. There are other optional parts of systemd that should

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

Tadej Janež wrote: > I would argue that the change causes noticeable problems and we want to > reconsider this change. > In particular, I think cloud image users would prefer to have their > cloud instances usable out of the box, i.e. have DNS working out-of-the > box. > > Don't get me wrong, I

Re: Don't update to the latest f33!

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:43 pm, David Both wrote: I will check because I thought I had TLS up and working. Apparently not. How did you discover this? I will fix it as soon as possible. All of my mails to you are bouncing. Notice you don't have any direct mails from me in your inbox.

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:24:41AM +, Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote: > On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 at 18:56, Micah Shennum wrote: > > > > Not sure if it's something weird with my system, but running that exact > > command I get > > > > Error: Unknown repo: 'updates-testing-modular' That's not an

Re: Don't update to the latest f33!

I will check because I thought I had TLS up and working. Apparently not. How did you discover this? I will fix it as soon as possible. I need to get one of my hosts to fail. When I do that I will send the results from that as well. These two examples have the correct data from my DHCP server.

Re: Radare2 and Cutter in an unmanageable dependency after project fork

Henrik Nordström wrote: > 2. Keep Radare2 and switch Cutter to R2Cutter. R2Cutter is the same > Cutter that currently is in fedora in terms of source, but it's future > is uncertain. And I am not sure if this is possible policy wise without > packaging R2Cutter and retiring Cutter.

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 14:19 -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: >> Just as there are many things that expect the 64K page size. I am not >> doing this. > > I don't really find either of those to be compelling arguments, FWIW. > > If we have broken code which makes assumptions

Re: src.fedoraproject.org/rpms not accurate?

Yes, that's right. So why wouldn't the package show on the overview page in the epel 7 branch then? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 21:19:26 - "Tom Seewald" wrote: > > On 22/02/2021 21:18, Tom Seewald wrote: > > > > > > > > Personally, I have an older GPU, RX 580 Polaris series, I will only > > spend dev time on the AMD Navi GPU issues after AMD makes the RX 6800 XT > > available in my region. I

Re: [dns-sig] Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora

On 2/22/21 9:12 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Quite frankly, I am not sure it would be a good idea to do things that > way. > > note that resolved should be fine as a resolvconf replacement, even if > you don't want to use it as a resolver: just set the /etc/resolv.conf > symlink to

Re: src.fedoraproject.org/rpms not accurate?

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:40 PM Andrew Bauer wrote: > > How can a package exist in an epel repo but not be reflected at > src.fedoraproject.org/rpms? > > For example, according this, mkvtoolnix should not exist in EPEL: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mkvtoolnix > > Except it does: > > $

src.fedoraproject.org/rpms not accurate?

How can a package exist in an epel repo but not be reflected at src.fedoraproject.org/rpms? For example, according this, mkvtoolnix should not exist in EPEL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mkvtoolnix Except it does: > $ repoquery -i mkvtoolnix > Name: mkvtoolnix > Version :

[rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2] PR #1: Package tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

> On 22/02/2021 21:18, Tom Seewald wrote: > > > > Personally, I have an older GPU, RX 580 Polaris series, I will only > spend dev time on the AMD Navi GPU issues after AMD makes the RX 6800 XT > available in my region. I simply don't have that card and I'm not going > to waste money buying the

Re: ELN SIG Launch

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:25 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > ELN Special Interest Group (SIG) ... > A weekly meeting time will be reserved for the ELN SIG to meet. However, it > will be canceled if there are no issues tagged with the meeting label. The > meeting time will be selected by a

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 11:14 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:46 pm, Tomasz Torcz > wrote: > > But "dns = none" seems wrong. > > Well it would be the right choice if cloud-init were to manually > configure a static list of DNS servers in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf >

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 09:45 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:05 pm, Tomasz Torcz > wrote: > > 3) Configure DNS resolvers if you want to use DNS. > > Or dig deeper: why cloud-init disabled DNS on your installation? > > I'm pretty sure cloud-init just doesn't know how

Re: Don't update to the latest f33!

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 1:45 pm, David Both wrote: Do you have any suggestions? Run 'resolvectl' and post the output so we can see what your configuration is. I hinted at this in my previous mail but it seems I didn't explicitly ask you to post what it outputs. Please post it so we can see

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 22/02/2021 21:18, Tom Seewald wrote: >> I feel that you underestimate the impact of the GPU driver issue >> >> If the GPU driver doesn't work, people can't even log in and get started > > I still do not understand why no one from the talos/ppc64le community is > following up on that amdgpu

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

> I feel that you underestimate the impact of the GPU driver issue > > If the GPU driver doesn't work, people can't even log in and get started I still do not understand why no one from the talos/ppc64le community is following up on that amdgpu regression[1] that was introduced with the 5.9

Re: Fedora's GPG key in DNS(SEC)

Hi, as a bind-utils maintainer, I have to ask. Why is dig -t TYPE61 used, when all stable Fedora supports dig -t OPENPGPKEY just fine. Type61 might be used as fallback for older releases On 2/12/21 8:22 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > All Fedora's GPG key - starting with Fedora 27 - are now stored

Re: [dns-sig] Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora

On Mo, 22.02.21 17:15, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote: > Wouldn't it be much simpler, if I could just dnf remove systemd-resolved > in case I don't want it? Then I don't have to make a proxy, but install > indeed a different package providing resolvconf. I think I would submit > that PR

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

Daniel Pocock wrote on 2/22/21 10:41 AM: > I feel that you underestimate the impact of the GPU driver issue > > If the GPU driver doesn't work, people can't even log in and get started > > If the GPU vendors don't test their code on ppc64le (and aarch64) then > those platforms will always lag

Re: git push on master branch rejected.

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:39:55AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > > Well it appears this is still the problem > > > > origin/rawhide/user/steved/pnfs-rawhide > > origin/rawhide_old/user/steved/pnfs-rawhide > Never mind... I just had to recreate the git tree... thanks again! https://xkcd.com/1597/

[rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2] PR #1: Package tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2` that you are following: `` Package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

Re: Don't update to the latest f33!

So here is my plan. Over the next few days I plan to use one or more VMs to test various configurations using systemd-resolved to see which ones work and which do not. Then we should be able to track down why. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks. --

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 22/02/2021 17:55, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 14:19 -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: >>> Some things, like the AMD Radeon GPU drivers, firmware or related >>> code, appear to be completely non-functional on the 64k page size. >>> Insufficient upstream developers are testing such

[rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib] PR #1: Tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Sundials-5.7.0

Hi all. 'sundials-5.7.0' is coming in Rawhide branch. Is reasonable pushing it in f34 too? Release notes: https://computing.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/release-history -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server:

Re: Automatizing package review process

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 05:24:06PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Hello folks, > > during the last winter holidays I've started to write a new flask app to > automatize the new package submission process. The goals of this app > would be: Awesome. Thanks for working on it! > - Get rid

Re: Bugzilla "I don't know" component

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:04 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I just filed > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931587 > on this. Follow along/add whatever you like to it. :) Thank you, Kevin! -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel

Re: Bugzilla "I don't know" component

I just filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931587 on this. Follow along/add whatever you like to it. :) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Bugzilla "I don't know" component

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 03:17:05PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > People occasionally drop by bugzilla, but don't know what component to > file a bug against. For some reason, they tend to pick the very first > component on the list, "0ad", which is a game. That doesn't help They also often pick

PA module support in PipeWire

Hi, I would like to ask about the developers' stance towards supporting PulseAudio plugins when using `pipewire-pulseaudio`. On some other mainstream distributions this can easily be achieved as the modules are packaged with the PA pipewire replacement package, however, in Fedora they are

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

After a quick glance at cloud-init code, it seems to me it does not check /etc/resolv.conf for symlinks. It just reads /etc/resolv.conf if it is a file, then writes its own nameservers into target. I have seen no rm of original /etc/resolv.conf, so I guess it rewritten target of symlink on Fedora

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:59:55AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:26 AM Jerry James wrote: > > Okay, I will try to get all of these builds done prior to beta freeze. > > The builds are all done now, and ocaml-ppx-tools-versioned has been > retired in F34+. As far as I

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:46 pm, Tomasz Torcz wrote: But "dns = none" seems wrong. Well it would be the right choice if cloud-init were to manually configure a static list of DNS servers in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf (or, previously, /etc/resolv.conf), which is probably what you want for a

[Bug 1877409] CVE-2020-14393 perl-dbi: Buffer overflow on an overlong DBD class name

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877409 --- Doc Text *updated* by RaTasha Tillery-Smith --- A buffer overflow was found in perl-DBI before version 1.643 in DBI.xs. This flaw allows a local attacker who can supply a string longer than 300 characters to cause an out-of-bounds write.

[Bug 1877402] CVE-2020-14392 perl-dbi: Memory corruption in XS functions when Perl stack is reallocated

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877402 --- Doc Text *updated* by RaTasha Tillery-Smith --- An untrusted pointer dereference flaw was found in Perl-DBI before version 1.643. This flaw allows a local attacker who can manipulate calls to dbd_db_login6_sv() to cause memory

[rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib] PR #1: Tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:26 AM Jerry James wrote: > Okay, I will try to get all of these builds done prior to beta freeze. The builds are all done now, and ocaml-ppx-tools-versioned has been retired in F34+. As far as I can tell, all OCaml-using packages except ocaml-dose3 and ocaml-oasis are

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 14:19 -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > > Some things, like the AMD Radeon GPU drivers, firmware or related > > code, appear to be completely non-functional on the 64k page size. > > Insufficient upstream developers are testing such issues on this > > architecture. > > Just as

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL Steering Committee meeting - find a new time

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 9:30 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 6:27 AM Pablo Sebastián Greco > wrote: > > > > Last time we did the voting in UTC, and ended up adapting it to DST in the > > US. Do you think we'll repeat it this time? > > > > Yeah, we will. Most of us attending the

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

Dnia Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:45:58AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro napisał(a): > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:05 pm, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > 3) Configure DNS resolvers if you want to use DNS. > > Or dig deeper: why cloud-init disabled DNS on your installation? > > I'm pretty sure cloud-init just

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34

>   sudo dnf module reset '*' > >   sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \ >     --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ >     distro-sync F32 x86_64 server: Error: Problem 1: package python3-blindspin-2.0.1-9.fc32.noarch requires

Re: [dns-sig] Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:15 pm, Petr Menšík wrote: Wouldn't it be much simpler, if I could just dnf remove systemd-resolved in case I don't want it? Is there some reason systemd-resolved cannot be a subpackage? Seems like that would be the easiest solution? If that's problematic for some

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:57 am, David Both wrote: do not think this is a cloud-init problem. None of my hosts are in any cloud and most failed to resolve after upgrade to F33. Only after reverting to nss resolver by disabling systemd-resolved did the problem disappear. Hi David, your

Re: [dns-sig] Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora

Wouldn't it be much simpler, if I could just dnf remove systemd-resolved in case I don't want it? Then I don't have to make a proxy, but install indeed a different package providing resolvconf. I think I would submit that PR on Fedora package instead. Or don't have any /usr/sbin/resolvconf, in

[Bug 1931471] perl-DBD-Mock-1.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931471 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-67c1384800 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-67c1384800 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1931471] perl-DBD-Mock-1.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931471 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-ece51f9d84 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ece51f9d84 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1931471] perl-DBD-Mock-1.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931471 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-DBD-Mock-1.59-1.fc34 -- You are

Fedora-IoT-34-20210222.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210220.0): ID: 786325 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786325 ID: 786330 Test: aarch64

Re: Radare2 and Cutter in an unmanageable dependency after project fork

Hi, I was the previous maintainer of radare2 and, among other things, an upstream developer of the same project. I, and others ex radare2 developers, have forked radare2 with Rizin some time ago. That said, I failed to follow the radare2 6-weeks schedule even before the forking decision/mess, so

[rpms/perl-DBD-Mock] PR #1: Tests

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-DBD-Mock` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBD-Mock/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1931380] perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.39 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931380 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.38

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

I do not think this is a cloud-init problem. None of my hosts are in any cloud and most failed to resolve after upgrade to F33. Only after reverting to nss resolver by disabling systemd-resolved did the problem disappear. I did investigate the new resolver but none of the options worked no

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34

Error:  Problem 1: package openmw-0.46.0-2.fc33.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem.so.1.73.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed   - boost-filesystem-1.73.0-9.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository   - problem with installed package

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:05 pm, Tomasz Torcz wrote: 3) Configure DNS resolvers if you want to use DNS. Or dig deeper: why cloud-init disabled DNS on your installation? I'm pretty sure cloud-init just doesn't know how to configure systemd-resolved at all. So I suspect this is a cloud-init

[389-devel] please review: PR 4650 - CLI/UI revise DNA plugin management

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4650 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora

On Mo, 22.02.21 16:29, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote: It might be OK for systemd's resolvectl to pass the call on to some other executable if it notices resolved is not there. We do the same in the "telinit" tool, so that Debian can have multiple init systems, and when ours owns the

[Bug 1931471] perl-DBD-Mock-1.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931471 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar

split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora

Hi, I have submitted new package openresolv [1], which provides resolvconf tool, similar to Debian's resolvconf package. Why? I thought about common interface to various DNS cache implementations for workstations and different VPN providers available. While I think the best place to direct,

[rpms/perl-DBD-Mock] PR #1: Tests

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-DBD-Mock` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBD-Mock/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1890602] EPEL8 Request: perl-Test-WWW-Selenium

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890602 Jakub Jedelsky changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 1931471] perl-DBD-Mock-1.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931471 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: git push on master branch rejected.

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:28:53AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > On 2/22/21 2:39 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 05:21:33PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> > >> Thanks you for your rapid reply! > >> > >> On 2/21/21 4:57 PM, Michael Young wrote: > >>> On Sun, 21

Re: git push on master branch rejected.

On 2/22/21 9:31 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > On 2/22/21 9:28 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: >> >> >> On 2/22/21 2:39 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 05:21:33PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: Thanks you for your rapid reply! On 2/21/21 4:57 PM, Michael

Fedora-34-20210222.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 22/183 (x86_64), 19/124 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210221.n.0): ID: 785960 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785960 ID: 785963

Re: git push on master branch rejected.

On 2/22/21 9:28 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > On 2/22/21 2:39 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 05:21:33PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >>> >>> Thanks you for your rapid reply! >>> >>> On 2/21/21 4:57 PM, Michael Young wrote: On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, Steve Dickson

Re: git push on master branch rejected.

On 2/22/21 2:39 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 05:21:33PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> >> Thanks you for your rapid reply! >> >> On 2/21/21 4:57 PM, Michael Young wrote: >>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, Steve Dickson wrote: >>> I apologies if I missed something... If

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On ma, 22 helmi 2021, Miro Hrončok wrote: tomcat-taglibs-parent orphan 5 weeks ago I've taken tomcat-taglibs-{parent,standard} as they are required for tomcat which is needed for Dogtag which is needed for FreeIPA. I rebuilt tomcat-taglibs-parent in

ldc 1.25 soname bump in f34 and rawhide

Hi all, I am about to build new ldc 1.25.0 that comes with a soname bump for both f34 and rawhide. I'll handle rebuilds of dependencies -- I did a test run in copr and everything looked fine, with the exception of two packages, appstream-generator and glibd that were already FTBFS prior to

[Bug 1931471] perl-DBD-Mock-1.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931471 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An HTTP error occurred downloading the package's new Source URLs: Getting https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/DBD/DBD-Mock-1.59.tar.gz to ./DBD-Mock-1.59.tar.gz -- You are

[Bug 1931471] New: perl-DBD-Mock-1.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931471 Bug ID: 1931471 Summary: perl-DBD-Mock-1.59 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DBD-Mock Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1807857] please build perl-Sys-SigAction on EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807857 --- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32268 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Hi, On 2/22/21 11:17 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[Bug 1807857] please build perl-Sys-SigAction on EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807857 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Fedora-IoT-35-20210222.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 4/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210217.0): ID: 786236 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786236 ID:

[Bug 1890933] Add perl-Pegex for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890933 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(g...@zimt.uni-siege

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210222.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210221.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210222.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 46 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

[Bug 1931364] perl-B-Keywords-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931364 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Help Needed: freetype <=> harfbuzz dependency loop affecting 5 Live Spins creation failure

s? I've added a OrderWithRequires statement to tell RPM how to sort this: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/c/3f6e76ab132da44d2196c035492b34c37df4e4e8 That should help resolve this issue. Unfortunately, this did not work. e.g. Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-34-20210222.n.0

Fedora-Rawhide-20210222.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 21/183 (x86_64), 11/124 (aarch64) New failures

[Bug 1931364] perl-B-Keywords-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931364 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

adf-accanthis-fonts: Taken by mjg :) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

[Bug 1807857] please build perl-Sys-SigAction on EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807857 --- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar --- I requested relengs to give me the permissions for epel8 . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On 2/22/21 11:17 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:58:09AM +0100, Tadej Janež wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to question the decision that was made by systemd >> maintainers to remove the fallback DNS server list: >>

[Bug 1930887] perl-HTTP-Message-6.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930887 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

Dnia Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:58:09AM +0100, Tadej Janež napisał(a): > Hi, > > I would like to question the decision that was made by systemd > maintainers to remove the fallback DNS server list: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/c/14b2fafb3688a4170a9c15235d1c3feb7ddeaf9d > > And then

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

Hi Tadej, I think more effort should be put to configure the instance correctly by provider. No default should save invalid configuration of container host. I think there is actually little benefit in systemd-resolved usage in a container. I would guess the container host would run proper dns

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210222.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210221.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210222.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 63 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 60.31 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

  1   2   >