https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218904
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-46924e402a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
tito-0.6.24-1.el7
Details about builds:
tito-0.6.24-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0ddb037e6a)
A tool for managing rpm based git projects
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
inih-57-1.el8
tito-0.6.24-1.el8
Details about builds:
inih-57-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fcc7c6323a)
Simple INI file parser library
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6398dade97
yt-dlp-2023.07.06-1.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
mirmon-2.11-15.el9
rust-tokio-1.29.1-1.el9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218904
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Am 08.07.23 um 22:44 schrieb Barry:
On 8 Jul 2023, at 19:56, Kushal Das wrote:
White background is a good choice for accessibility iirc.
Isn’t is contrast that matters not any particular background?
On the contrary it helps, a white background helps the human visual
system to
Sorry if this comes through twice. Apparently thunderbird's "Reply to
list" thought I meant to send it to devel-announce, not devel.
On 7/5/23 05:25, Aoife Moloney wrote:
== Feedback ==
Initial
> On 8 Jul 2023, at 19:56, Kushal Das wrote:
>
> White background is a good choice for accessibility iirc.
Isn’t is contrast that matters not any particular background?
Personal I find white background is not a good accessibility choice for me.
Barry
On 08/07/2023 19:50, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
I will use my PP rights to rebuild them in a side tag for Rawhide.
The side tag has been merged:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ff83d4f4aa
FTBFS:
cryfs (Python 3.12 issue: AttributeError: module 'configparser' has no
attribute
On 27/05/23, Peter Oliver wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2023, Marián Konček wrote:
>
> > AFAIK Gnome Terminal is the only terminal that uses white background by
> > default. To my knowledge, all the other terminals use black background.
>
> Both xterm and rxvt default to a white background.
>
White
I love the idea of a colorized prompt by default on Fedora!
A few points to the posted example:
- Let's keep it somewhat identical to the existing one unless a change is
really important
- Let's leave out the RC code from the prompt - that can be useful in certain
scenarios, but is
On 7/8/23 19:48, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Saturday, 08 July 2023 at 19:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 01:06:01PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 06/07/2023 18:10, Aoife Moloney wrote:
but the conversation about each change
will take place on Fedora
Hello all.
spdlog 1.12.0 will include a soversion bump from .1.11 to .1.12.
Affected packages (including spdlog-devel and virtual cmake(spdlog) and
pkgconfig(spdlog)):
- bear
- coeurl
- cryfs
- CuraEngine
- freeopcua
- gerbera
- gnuradio
- gqrx
- gr-air-modes
- gr-funcube
- gr-hpsdr
-
On Saturday, 08 July 2023 at 19:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 01:06:01PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 06/07/2023 18:10, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > > but the conversation about each change
> > > will take place on Fedora Discussion at
> > >
On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 01:06:01PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 06/07/2023 18:10, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > but the conversation about each change
> > will take place on Fedora Discussion at
> >
On Friday, 07 July 2023 at 23:45, Björn Persson wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > The problem is if users are expected to answer, they are going to
> > probably answer No and it's effectively the same as an opt-in. But if
> > we have a default value, users will be inclined to leave the
On 7/8/23 06:19, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 05:10:24PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
>> == Summary ==
>>
>> The Red Hat Display Systems Team (which develops the desktop) proposes
>> to enable limited data collection of anonymous Fedora Workstation
>> usage metrics.
>
> One
On Fri, Jul 7 2023 at 09:21:15 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
For metrics to not be personally identifiable, it is necessary that
the
set of metrics collected have sufficiently low entropy that on
average,
_many_ users will send _the exact same metrics_. It is very hard for
me
to see
On Sat, Jul 8 2023 at 12:08:09 AM +, Randy Barlow via devel
wrote:
I agree.
I think it is important to make it possible for a user to ask for the
data collected from their machine to be deleted in the event they
mistakenly submitted data, or changed their mind.
To be able to delete your
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230707.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230708.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 138
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.17 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 06/07/2023 18:10, Aoife Moloney wrote:
but the conversation about each change
will take place on Fedora Discussion at
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-request-privacy-preserving-telemetry-for-fedora-workstation-system-wide/85320
It looks like they've started moving replies
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 05:10:24PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> == Summary ==
>
> The Red Hat Display Systems Team (which develops the desktop) proposes
> to enable limited data collection of anonymous Fedora Workstation
> usage metrics.
One thing to realize here is that, no matter what
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230708.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Sat, Jul 8, 2023, at 03:21, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> If Fedora has 2 million users (possibly an overestimate) then the
> metrics would need to have entropy much less than 2^21, which means
> that the entire metrics set would need to be able to be represented
> as a 20-bit integer. In
24 matches
Mail list logo
