From 516515b39eed66780b96ff936cfca3c514758c3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Miro=20Hron=C4=8Dok?= <m...@hroncok.cz>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:58:11 +0200
Subject: Remove patch for Boost 1.60
---
slic3r-boost160.patch | 21 -
slic3r.spec | 7 +---
On 14/01/16 12:40 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then
1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag?
Boost 1.60 really has landed in rawhide now (a few days ago actually,
sorry
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote:
> Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
>
> I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 1.60.0-2
> this morning in the main f24 tag?
There's been no request on the rel
On 14/01/16 13:23 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 14/01/16 12:40 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then
1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag?
Obviously that has triggered a bunch
Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then
1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag?
Obviously that has triggered a bunch of dependency failures in koschei.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote:
>> Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
>>
>> I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 1.60.0-2
>> this morning in the main f24 tag?
>
> There's been no request on the rel-eng ticket to tag it all b
t; wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote:
>>> Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
>>>
>>> I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then
>>> 1.60.0-2 this morning in the mai
On 14/01/16 12:40 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then
1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag?
Obviously that has triggered a bunch of dependency failures in koschei.
Argh! Sorry
On 14/01/16 13:27, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 14/01/16 13:23 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 14/01/16 12:40 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then
1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> What you meant was "Does this mean one of upgrade or update, rather
> than uplift?" and the answer is yes, but I asked which one of upgrade
> or update it should be.
>
> If it doesn't matter I'll just pick one and use that for future Boost
> update proposals (I seem to
Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >>= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
> >
> >Does this mean "upgrade" or "update"?
>
> I just copied that from the previous change proposals, but I'm not
> sure what the
Am 01.12.2015 um 22:15 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:57:53PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28/11/15 20:05 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
Does
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:15:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:57:53PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 28/11/15 20:05 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > >>= Syste
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:57:53PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28/11/15 20:05 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >>= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
> >
> >Does this mean &quo
On 28/11/15 20:05 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
Does this mean "upgrade" or "update"?
I just copied that from the previous change proposals, but I'm not
sure
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
Does this mean "upgrade" or "update"?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and vi
On 27/11/15 08:32, Jan Kurik wrote:
I am re-sending this Change announcement to the devel@ list, as due to
the migration of mailinglists the original announcement [1] has
reached only devel-announce@ mailing list and has never been forwarded
to the devel@ list.
That's not actually true. It
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:28:45 +0100
Jan Kurik <jku...@redhat.com> wrote:
> = System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Jonathan Wakely
>
> This change brings Boost 1.60.0 to Fedora 2
= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160
Change owner(s):
* Jonathan Wakely
This change brings Boost 1.60.0 to Fedora 24. This will mean F24 ships
with the latest upstream Boost release.
== Detailed Description ==
The aim
= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160
Change owner(s):
* Jonathan Wakely
This change brings Boost 1.60.0 to Fedora 24. This will mean F24 ships
with the latest upstream Boost release.
== Detailed Description ==
The aim
On 20/11/15 17:54 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:28:45 +0100
Jan Kurik <jku...@redhat.com> wrote:
= System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160
Change owner(s):
* Jonathan Wakely
This change brings Boost
21 matches
Mail list logo
