Re: SPDX: Consistency of tools

On 04. 04. 23 7:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote: AFAIK both tool has been already migrated and will complain when you use short format. At least rpmlint will not complain for old license identifiers. rpmlint-fedora-license-data contains both - /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml and -

Re: SPDX: Consistency of tools

On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 12:45 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 04. 23 v 3:20 Richard Shaw napsal(a): > > I have updated my licensecount script which summarises the licenses in a > source and uses licensecheck to output SPDX licenses instead, but they > output the "short" form as far as I can

Re: SPDX: Consistency of tools

V Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 08:20:07PM -0500, Richard Shaw napsal(a): > While no matter what we do, there are maintainers that are not going to > proactively update their packages, until we unify the tools and > documentation to "do the right thing", we're pissing in the wind. > What surprised me is

Re: SPDX: Consistency of tools

On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 1:45 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 04. 04. 23 v 3:20 Richard Shaw napsal(a): > > WARNING: This is a small rant... > > np :) > > I decided to look up my packages on src.fedoraproject.org (I'm still not sure > if it's showing me all packages I'm admin of, or just main

Re: SPDX: Consistency of tools

Dne 04. 04. 23 v 3:20 Richard Shaw napsal(a): WARNING: This is a small rant... np :) I decided to look up my packages on src.fedoraproject.org (I'm still not sure if it's showing me all packages I'm admin of, or just main admin) and start working through them