On 26-07-2023 17:36, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
Hello Sandro,
I noticed that in f39 builds in Copr the directory containing the
results is now named after the package. Comparing that to the
"traditional" fedora-review directory in f38 builds, I miss the
`licensecheck.txt` file.
It suddenly started
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> Hello Sandro,
>
> > I noticed that in f39 builds in Copr the directory containing the
> > results is now named after the package. Comparing that to the
> > "traditional" fedora-review directory in f38 builds, I miss the
> >
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 09:47:32PM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:54:43AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > Like many of you, I have been quite inconvenienced because of
> > dnf5-related breakage of fedora-review. I've been monkeying with it
> > today
Hello Sandro,
> I noticed that in f39 builds in Copr the directory containing the
> results is now named after the package. Comparing that to the
> "traditional" fedora-review directory in f38 builds, I miss the
> `licensecheck.txt` file.
It suddenly started happening and I don't know what is to
On 25-07-2023 04:47, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Once this lands in F38, Fedora Review Service should be fixed, unless
I'm missing something.
First of all, thanks for bringing fedora-review back. I rely on it quite
a bit reviewing my own packages as well as for official reviews.
I noticed
Thank you very much Michel for going through the release.
It couldn't be easy.
There is a reported bug in Bodhi, so it will need some minor fixups
but we are close. Really looking forward to it.
Jakub
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:48 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Jul 17,
Hi all,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:54:43AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> Like many of you, I have been quite inconvenienced because of
> dnf5-related breakage of fedora-review. I've been monkeying with it
> today and finally got a successful run of fedora-review after making
> the following
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 15:27:01 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023, 15:22 Maxwell G wrote:
>
> > On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> > > Hello Jerry,
> > > I proposed a workaround a few days ago
> > > https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
> > >
On pondělí 17. července 2023 20:39:11 CEST Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:54 AM Jerry James wrote:
> > Like many of you, I have been quite inconvenienced because of
> > dnf5-related breakage of fedora-review. I've been monkeying with it
> > today and finally got a successful run
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 7:28 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023, 15:22 Maxwell G wrote:
>> --requires --resolve resolves the entire dependency tree of a package.
>> --requires just prints the direct dependencies that are specified in the
>> RPM metadata.
>> I don't know what this
On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 15:27 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023, 15:22 Maxwell G wrote:
>
> > On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> > > Hello Jerry,
> > > I proposed a workaround a few days ago
> > > https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
> > >
> >
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023, 15:22 Maxwell G wrote:
> On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> > Hello Jerry,
> > I proposed a workaround a few days ago
> > https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
> >
> > but your patch looks like a proper fix. I'll try it and merge to the
> >
On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> Hello Jerry,
> I proposed a workaround a few days ago
> https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
>
> but your patch looks like a proper fix. I'll try it and merge to the
> fedora-review codebase.
>
> Does anybody know what was the
Hello Jerry,
I proposed a workaround a few days ago
https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485
but your patch looks like a proper fix. I'll try it and merge to the
fedora-review codebase.
Does anybody know what was the purpose of --resolve and if it will be
no problem when we remove it?
On 17-07-2023 20:39, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:54 AM Jerry James wrote:
Like many of you, I have been quite inconvenienced because of
dnf5-related breakage of fedora-review. I've been monkeying with it
today and finally got a successful run of fedora-review after making
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:54 AM Jerry James wrote:
> Like many of you, I have been quite inconvenienced because of
> dnf5-related breakage of fedora-review. I've been monkeying with it
> today and finally got a successful run of fedora-review after making
> the following changes [*].
>
> 1.
Like many of you, I have been quite inconvenienced because of
dnf5-related breakage of fedora-review. I've been monkeying with it
today and finally got a successful run of fedora-review after making
the following changes [*].
1. Edit /etc/mock/templates/fedora-rawhide.tpl. Change:
17 matches
Mail list logo
