Re: F29 Self-Contained Change: Basic FPGA Support

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Justin Forbes wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: >> >> == Summary == >> A number of devices like Xilinx ZYNQ based devices such as the >> 96boards Ultra96 and the Intel based UP² have onboard FPGAs. FPGA >> manager is a vendor-neutral

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:52 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Can you give some more details as those would help Investigate the problem > better. > What additional information would you like to know? [P.S.: please avoid top-posting.] -- Rajeesh ___

Re: experiencing dnf Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' or ''updates'

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:27 AM Michal Novotny wrote: > > Hello, > > I am occasionally experiencing the following error in my day-to-day dnf use: > > Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' > > or > > Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates' > > I've had that happened even in

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

Honestly, I think Koschei should be mandatory for every package or at least opt-out by default at this point. Vít Dne 20.7.2018 v 03:56 Dan Callaghan napsal(a): > Excerpts from Miro Hrončok's message of 2018-07-19 17:48 +02:00: >> I know it is not comfortable, yet at this point reverting the

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:02:19AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Honestly, I think Koschei should be mandatory for every package or at > least opt-out by default at this point. +1 That said, we should be working to reduce false positives as much as possible. Zbyszek

Re: experiencing dnf Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' or ''updates'

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 20.7.2018 06:25, Michal Novotny wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am occasionally experiencing the following error in my day-to-day dnf >> use: >> >> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' >> >> or >> >> Failed to synchronize

Re: audiofile package to become an orphan

If upstream is no longer maintaining it, in my opinion you should evaluate to remove it from Fedora repository: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: python 2 retirement commo efforts

Good numbers to provide, thanks. I've one thought for you. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:24 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > I did not try to structure and run a report to try to > enumerate and count by dependencies. Looking at the > problem with such a statistic, as to 'upstream' 'keystone' > packages

Re: Errors in compiling darktable subpackages

On 7/19/18 10:15 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > I used to get these errors too for some of my packages. It turned out > that upstream made some mistakes in their CMakeLists.txt files: > The errors were usually caused by some CMakeLists.txt file overriding > the system-provided CFLAGS with something

Re: experiencing dnf Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' or ''updates'

On 20.7.2018 06:25, Michal Novotny wrote: Hello, I am occasionally experiencing the following error in my day-to-day dnf use:     Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' or     Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates' I've had that happened even in local mock builds. Do you

Re: dnf history - change in how rpmdb checksum is computed

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 6:02 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 03:24:54PM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > The DNF team is currently reviewing DNF compatibility with YUM 3 and > we'd > > > like

Re: dnf history - change in how rpmdb checksum is computed

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:02 AM Daniel Mach wrote: > > > If a user migrates from RHEL 7 to the next version of RHEL (or CentOS), > > there will be continuity in used algorithm and history db checksums. > > It's important to some enterprise

Re: Again, please announce your so-name bumps!

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 17:48 Rex Dieter wrote: > Christian Dersch wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > please announce your so-name bumps *before* you push them. This time > > LibRaw bumped its version > > I added explicit soname tracking there so hopefully it won't happen again > (at least not by

Re: experiencing dnf Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' or ''updates'

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 20.7.2018 06:25, Michal Novotny wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am occasionally experiencing the following error in my day-to-day dnf >>> use: >>> >>> Failed to synchronize

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot, I'm going to automatically add BuildRequires: gcc and/or BuildRequires: gcc-c++ to packages which fail to build with common messages (like gcc: command not found, also autotools/cmake/meson are

Re: dnf history - change in how rpmdb checksum is computed

Use headerFormat() with a configurable format string to extract the package identifier item in the list that is check summed and have it both ways. Why anyone wishes to preserve compatibility with yum's bloated history database in order to flip between two depsolvers is left to RH TAM's to

Re: audiofile package to become an orphan

Germano Massullo wrote: > If upstream is no longer maintaining it, in my opinion you should > evaluate to remove it from Fedora repository: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life That will happen automatically if nobody picks it up. For a library such as

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 15:27 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > No one promised that I'm going to fix 100% of packages, I've fixed around > > 2k packages. What my regex couldn't catch -- please send me list of > > packages, I will analyze them and try to fix as much as possible. > >

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

Miro Hrončok wrote: > I know it is not comfortable, yet at this point reverting the change and > doing another mass rebuild is IMHO more work than fixing the packages. It may be more work for 1 or 2 rel-eng people, but it would save work for hundreds of affected maintainers and hence result in

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

Igor Gnatenko wrote: > No one promised that I'm going to fix 100% of packages, I've fixed around > 2k packages. What my regex couldn't catch -- please send me list of > packages, I will analyze them and try to fix as much as possible. IMHO, it is unacceptable that you make a change breaking

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:48:24PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > If the FTBFS script has ran too early, all the FTBFS bugs need to be > > closed and the FTBFS script has to be run again later. > > > > If the automatic BuildRequires fixing script missed all these, then > > I suggest that: >

Re: Errors in compiling darktable subpackages

A user in darktable mailing list [1] said "If you are using -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld at link time, you also need to use -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 at compile time, and as you are compiling and linking at the same time, you need either both, or drop the

Resigning from LXQt maintainance

Hi all, as some of you might have recognized, Fedora's LXQt is quite outdated (we have 0.11, current one for some weeks now is 0.13) and also needs some rework with respect to theming and the package set (upstream restructured packaging a bit with respect to common files). When I joined the

Re: Resigning from LXQt maintainance

Hi, are you already a packager? The work is mostly updating packages, besides that one important part is the theming of LXQt (usage of Fedora wallpaper etc.) and finally maintaining the live spin. Packaging is the most important topic. Greetings, Christian On 07/20/2018 04:44 PM, Manas

Re: Resigning from LXQt maintainance

I can give this a shot,My name is Manas i am a Computer Engineering undergrad. I dont know if i have the skills require for this. Can you give some more information regarding the job. I started contributing recently to withing the past month or so,as of today i am the creator and maintainer for

Intent to retire StarCluster and python-iptools

I'm going to be retiring StarCluster and its dependency python-iptools shortly. Upstream is dead and I'm not using it. -- Orion Poplawski Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane

Fedora crda To wireless-regdb Upgrade

A mostly "behind the scenes" aspect of the Linux wireless LAN (IEEE802.11) subsystem has changed upstream with some system-level effects. Replacing an existing package with a cleaner but functionally equivalent package is an attractive option, but there are questions regarding the update path, how

Re: some trac plugins looking for point of contacts

On 07/19/2018 02:59 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:41:53 -0700 > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> Hey all. >> >> I have: >> >> trac-bazaar-plugin >> trac-git-plugin >> trac-iniadmin-plugin >> trac-mercurial-plugin >> trac-ticketdelete-plugin > > I took a look at

Re: Resigning from LXQt maintainance

Yes i am already a packager,i can do this then On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, 21:30 Christian Dersch, wrote: > Hi, > > are you already a packager? The work is mostly updating packages, besides > that one important part is the theming of LXQt (usage of Fedora wallpaper > etc.) and finally maintaining the

Re: Fedora crda To wireless-regdb Upgrade

Package renaming using Obsoletes/Provides will be a problem *ONLY* if applications confuse the version of the package with the CRDB format version: these are intrinsically different versions even if there is a single package renaming event that is coincident with the CRDB format change.

Re: experiencing dnf Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' or ''updates'

On 07/20/2018 03:55 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > > I actually already filed the respective bugs: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591225 > > There is even PR: > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1109 > > that got blocked for an unknown reason and mainly

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-07-23 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't see anything urgent to discuss, so let's take the time off. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson

[Bug 1604727] ctstream-28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604727 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-07-20 - 88% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/07/20/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.12-20180720gitdd18389.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1604727] ctstream-28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604727 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- ctstream-28-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9cc6de6034 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 1604727] ctstream-28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604727 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- ctstream-28-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9859fc090d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 1604727] ctstream-28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604727 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- ctstream-28-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7bc03ad3c3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[rpms/perl-Parallel-ForkManager] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Parallel-ForkManager" (master)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Parallel-ForkManager on branch master, which you are following: 86f1ad27b6e16bb712a570f0ff2366381c408742Jason TibbittsUpdate to 1.20. To view more about the commits, visit:

[Bug 1605411] perl-Mail-Sendmail: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605411 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465418 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465418=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605411] perl-Mail-Sendmail: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605411 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465417 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465417=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605412] perl-Net-Pcap: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605412 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465420 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465420=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605412] perl-Net-Pcap: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605412 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465419 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465419=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605412] New: perl-Net-Pcap: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605412 Bug ID: 1605412 Summary: perl-Net-Pcap: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Pcap Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1605412] perl-Net-Pcap: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605412 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465421 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465421=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605424] perl-Wx: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605424 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465462 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465462=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605423] perl-WWW-Curl: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605423 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465459 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465459=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605423] perl-WWW-Curl: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605423 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465461 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465461=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605424] perl-Wx: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605424 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465463 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465463=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605423] perl-WWW-Curl: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605423 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465460 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465460=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605424] New: perl-Wx: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605424 Bug ID: 1605424 Summary: perl-Wx: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Wx Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com Reporter: mbo...@bhujji.com

[Bug 1605421] perl-TryCatch: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605421 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465454 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465454=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605422] perl-URL-Encode-XS: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605422 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465456 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465456=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605420] perl-Text-Iconv: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605420 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465451 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465451=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605421] perl-TryCatch: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605421 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465452 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465452=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605422] perl-URL-Encode-XS: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605422 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465455 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465455=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605422] New: perl-URL-Encode-XS: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605422 Bug ID: 1605422 Summary: perl-URL-Encode-XS: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-URL-Encode-XS Assignee: dd...@cpan.org Reporter:

[Bug 1605423] New: perl-WWW-Curl: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605423 Bug ID: 1605423 Summary: perl-WWW-Curl: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-WWW-Curl Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter:

[Bug 1605418] perl-Template-Toolkit: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605418 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465444 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465444=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605419] perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605419 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465448 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465448=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605419] perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605419 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465447 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465447=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605420] perl-Text-Iconv: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605420 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465449 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465449=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605420] perl-Text-Iconv: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605420 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465450 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465450=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605419] New: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605419 Bug ID: 1605419 Summary: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr

[Bug 1605421] New: perl-TryCatch: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605421 Bug ID: 1605421 Summary: perl-TryCatch: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-TryCatch Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1605418] perl-Template-Toolkit: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605418 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465445 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465445=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605421] perl-TryCatch: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605421 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465453 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465453=edit root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605419] perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605419 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465446 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465446=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605420] New: perl-Text-Iconv: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605420 Bug ID: 1605420 Summary: perl-Text-Iconv: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-Iconv Assignee: andr...@bawue.net Reporter:

[Bug 1603196] perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603196 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1605410] perl-Inline-Python: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605410 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465412 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465412=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605410] perl-Inline-Python: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605410 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465411 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465411=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605410] New: perl-Inline-Python: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605410 Bug ID: 1605410 Summary: perl-Inline-Python: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Inline-Python Assignee: j.k.nil...@usit.uio.no

[Bug 1605408] perl-GO-TermFinder: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605408 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465410 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465410=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605410] perl-Inline-Python: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605410 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465413 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465413=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605411] New: perl-Mail-Sendmail: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605411 Bug ID: 1605411 Summary: perl-Mail-Sendmail: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-Sendmail Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1605411] perl-Mail-Sendmail: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605411 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465415 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465415=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605408] perl-GO-TermFinder: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605408 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465409 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465409=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605408] perl-GO-TermFinder: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605408 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465408 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465408=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605408] New: perl-GO-TermFinder: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605408 Bug ID: 1605408 Summary: perl-GO-TermFinder: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-GO-TermFinder Assignee: extras-orp...@fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1604727] ctstream-28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604727 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[rpms/perl-HTML-Lint] New Commits To "rpms/perl-HTML-Lint" (master)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-HTML-Lint on branch master, which you are following: aade9bb74af6497d213b0d29b2bca0cc5f2acb04Ralf CorsépiusUpdate to 2.32. To view more about the commits, visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Lint/commits/master

[Bug 1605407] New: perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605407 Bug ID: 1605407 Summary: perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-MMagic-XS Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com

[Bug 1605407] perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605407 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465405 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465405=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605407] perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605407 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465406 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465406=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605407] perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605407 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465407 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465407=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605422] perl-URL-Encode-XS: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605422 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465457 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465457=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605425] perl-XML-Parser: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605425 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465466 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465466=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605424] perl-Wx: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605424 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465464 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465464=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605425] New: perl-XML-Parser: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605425 Bug ID: 1605425 Summary: perl-XML-Parser: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-Parser Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1605425] perl-XML-Parser: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605425 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465465 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465465=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605425] perl-XML-Parser: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605425 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465467 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465467=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1604727] ctstream-28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604727 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- ctstream-28-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 40 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7 35 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-15b7dc35af pass-1.7.2-1.el7 16

[Bug 1605404] perl-Data-Structure-Util: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605404 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465395 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465395=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605404] New: perl-Data-Structure-Util: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605404 Bug ID: 1605404 Summary: perl-Data-Structure-Util: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Data-Structure-Util Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr

[Bug 1605404] perl-Data-Structure-Util: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605404 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465396 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465396=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1605404] perl-Data-Structure-Util: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605404 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465397 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465397=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605402] New: perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605402 Bug ID: 1605402 Summary: perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin Assignee: c...@plauener.de

[Bug 1605402] perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605402 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465389 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465389=edit build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1605402] perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605402 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1465390 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1465390=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

  1   2   >