#15: Who retired libgeotiff
--+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Package request |Version:
Resolution:
#15: Who retired libgeotiff
--+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Package request |Version:
Resolution:
libgeotiff was accidentally (I presume) retired from EPEL6. I've filed the a
review to get it reinstated:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158983
It would be nice to get this reviewed ASAP.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA,
On 8/7/2014 1:29 PM, Fred Wittekind wrote:
On 8/5/2014 5:55 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Fred Wittekind
r...@twister.dyndns.org mailto:r...@twister.dyndns.org wrote:
How soon might a el7 version of this package be available? I can
see that there
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
922
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
376
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
141
The EPEL Steering Committee will be having it's weekly meeting tomorrow,
2014-10-31 at 20:00 UTC in #epel on the freenode network.
Suggested topics:
{{{
#topic Greetings and roll call
#topic Wrangling business
#topic Old Business?
#subtopic ticket 2 How to handle systemd service activation
Hi all!
Feeling dumb (again...) I have a package which I now need to split into
subpackages. Also, I want the original package to just be an empty one
pulling in all the new subpackages, giving a smooth upgrade path
(installing the base package installs everything, as it used to be).
My
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 21 Beta.
Thursday, October 30, 2014 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 18:00 CET)
Reminder: Europe already moved from summer time, winter is coming!
Before each
Hello
2014-10-30 10:32 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com:
Hi all!
Feeling dumb (again...) I have a package which I now need to split into
subpackages. Also, I want the original package to just be an empty one
pulling in all the new subpackages, giving a smooth upgrade path
On 30/10/14 10:41, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Hello
2014-10-30 10:32 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com:
Hi all!
Feeling dumb (again...) I have a package which I now need to split
into subpackages.
[cut]
Does this help?
2014-10-30 10:50 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com:
On 30/10/14 10:41, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Hello
2014-10-30 10:32 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com:
Hi all!
Feeling dumb (again...) I have a package which I now need to split
On 30/10/14 10:58, Sergio Pascual wrote:
2014-10-30 10:50 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com:
On 30/10/14 10:41, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Hello
2014-10-30 10:32 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
Compose started at Thu Oct 30 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires
On 10/29/2014 05:06 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Robert Marcano
rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote:
I created a new bug [1] that explains that ssmtp is sending all cron jobs
output to an external SMTP server. I marked it as a security bug, the
security tag was removed and
On Wednesday 29 of October 2014 15:03:32 Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:20:31PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
Libtool upstream was able to cut the new release!
I'll rebase the Rawhide package probably by the end of the next week or
so, if there are no objections.
So gluegen is FTBFS in f21/22. From my repoqueries, nothing needs it, and
if anyone's using it they should move to gluegen2, though it's also FTBFS.
If no one steps up to assist (my Java-fu is weak), I'll retire it next week.
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
Compose started at Thu Oct 30 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Macaulay2]
Macaulay2-1.6-4.fc21.i686 requires libntl.so.3
[PyQuante]
On Wednesday 29 of October 2014 15:51:12 Kalev Lember wrote:
On 10/29/2014 03:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
Libtool upstream was able to cut the new release!
Thanks Pavel for dealing with this!
While you are at this, any chance you could try convincing upstream to
add /usr/lib64 to the
Hi everybody,
I am pretty sure, that this was already discussed many times, but I
proposed to drop the seemingly last dependency of RPM on Perl in this
[1] ticket and hence Perl from minimal buildroot (unless it will be
pulled in by some other packages). The RPM maintainers as well as Perl
Once upon a time, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com said:
I am pretty sure, that this was already discussed many times, but I
proposed to drop the seemingly last dependency of RPM on Perl in this
[1] ticket and hence Perl from minimal buildroot (unless it will be
pulled in by some other
The undocumented openmpi and mpich updates in RHEL6.6 have broken binary
compatibility and seem to be provoking general rebuilds of things in
EPEL. While that may be OK for things that are packaged in EPEL, it at
best doesn't help with our HPC users' locally-built programs or
local/copr-published
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 14:27 +, Dave Love wrote:
The undocumented openmpi and mpich updates in RHEL6.6 have broken binary
compatibility and seem to be provoking general rebuilds of things in
EPEL. While that may be OK for things that are packaged in EPEL, it at
best doesn't help with our
On 10/30/2014 08:27 AM, Dave Love wrote:
The undocumented openmpi and mpich updates in RHEL6.6 have broken binary
compatibility and seem to be provoking general rebuilds of things in
EPEL.
Just a quick note - this discussion belongs on the EPEL mailing list.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 11:14 -0400, Peter Martuccelli wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 14:27 +, Dave Love wrote:
The undocumented openmpi and mpich updates in RHEL6.6 have broken binary
compatibility and seem to be provoking general rebuilds of things in
EPEL. While that may be OK for
Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com writes:
There was a changeover in maintainership for this package internally, so
I'm coming into this issue cold.
Thanks for responding. (I assume that means the Red Hat openmpi
package.) I wasn't expecting to get it sorted out in RHEL, and wanted
to avoid
On 2014-10-30, 14:04 GMT, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com said:
I am pretty sure, that this was already discussed many times, but I
proposed to drop the seemingly last dependency of RPM on Perl in this
[1] ticket and hence Perl from minimal buildroot
On 30 October 2014 14:02, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
If you have any comments, please speak up now.
No comment, just lots of thanks!
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
At the Fedora 21 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting #3 that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go with the Fedora 21 Beta by Fedora QA, Release Engineering
and Development.
Fedora 21 Beta will be publicly available on Tuesday, November 04, 2014.
Meeting details can be seen here:
Minutes: http://bit.ly/1tmPWzw
As a fix for this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046341
The following symbolic link was added to xorg-x11-font-utils:
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 12 Aug 18 23:08 /usr/share/fonts/X11 - ../X11/fonts
This causes fontconfig to search the full X11 hierarchy whereas before it only
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 October 2014 14:02, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
If you have any comments, please speak up now.
No comment, just lots of thanks!
Richard
I tried this, *twice*. Once way, way back when with Red Hat 6.x
Updated my rawhide system. Now it doesn't boot cleanly. Will try to
figure out the details in the morning (long week!), but Found ordering
cycle on basic.target/start seems to be part of it, and I wanted to
see if anyone else is hitting this (and possibly caution care on
upgrading right now).
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sereal-Encoder:
18e88a20ae5842f98e2874557d8d525c Sereal-Encoder-3.002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ee98974d04638fe3084e105f438ea5f7cb2c81f6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 30 07:43:18 2014 +0100
Fix a typo
perl-Sereal-Encoder.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Sereal-Encoder.spec b/perl-Sereal-Encoder.spec
commit d8a37ec1aaba9dd933c67ccbc1614d5a948ce63b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 30 07:42:57 2014 +0100
Import
.gitignore |1 +
...xternal-csnappy-library-in-Sereal-Encoder.patch | 93 ++
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Apocalypse:
20717c10c0cade4f5fcc867fbeee89e4 Test-Apocalypse-1.006.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b39e6d0dce27f1a2530bc4ca1ee6de6515155563
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 30 09:14:03 2014 +0100
1.006 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Test-Apocalypse.spec | 54 +++-
sources |2 +-
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157496
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.18()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158873
Bug ID: 1158873
Summary: cpan should offer creating site directories
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158860
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158873
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 952115
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=952115action=edit
Fix
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158860
--- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Panu Matilainen from comment #4)
Um. I dont know what rpm version you are looking at
# rpm -q rpm-build -R | grep perl
/usr/bin/perl
perl(File::Basename)
perl(File::Temp)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158873
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 99905
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132321
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 99905
--
You are
commit 4a3fce664120eb6c2a4f6ed70a8235c4d47734f6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 30 13:37:37 2014 +0100
Create site paths for the first time
...reate-site-library-directories-on-first-t.patch | 54
perl-CPAN.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158860
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6)
Thanks. I can help lobbying (at minimum). Would you prefer me to announce
this proposal on fedora-devel in adwance (e.g. right now)?
You can try
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158873
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132321
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
I fixed it as perl-CPAN-2.05-308.fc22 in F22. Older Fedoras will patch the perl
sources.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Hello,
as you could read in last (2014-10-29) FESCo meeting minutes
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203801.html,
packages under Iain Arnell's maintence
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/iarnell/ will be orphaned
because Iain is not functional anymore.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132321
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132321
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 952169
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=952169action=edit
Fix ported to perl-5.18.4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
commit b2af2a1eb08252b6f3c8ee1779d9042b724678c7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 30 15:31:16 2014 +0100
Create site paths by cpan for the first time
...reate-site-library-directories-on-first-t.patch | 51
perl.spec
commit 0c06d11be56fbc3de83f8cd45bfd0bffb7df7de8
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 30 15:31:16 2014 +0100
Create site paths by cpan for the first time
...reate-site-library-directories-on-first-t.patch | 51
perl.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158392
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jose.p.oliveira.oss@gmail.c |ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158400
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit 15b654587bbf14bebf6e8b6ccc0fc839ff1c471d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:33:03 2014 +0100
Build-require Devel::PPPort
perl-ZeroMQ.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-ZeroMQ.spec b/perl-ZeroMQ.spec
index
commit b5584163a2f7c28a331cbe19af5aaa68da86abb7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:37:46 2014 +0100
Build-require Devel::PPPort
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132321
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.18.4-305.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.18.4-305.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132321
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.18.4-291.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.18.4-291.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158431
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary of changes:
f0c7c8f... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass (*)
2d2a2ed... qpid-cpp now builds on ARM (*)
2a322ac... Updated the virtual package dependencies. (*)
19552ba... Merge branch 'master' into f21 (*)
e55afa6... - Rebuilt for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158392
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158400
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
commit 6c5008ff5524812d81977e2b2fdb766427ae1e3c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:53:53 2014 +0100
Build-require Devel::PPPort
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3.spec |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3.spec
commit 80b0b7d784b41c56e3d6cb4a6ccb1973ee9de43d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:51:56 2014 +0100
Fix local build from dist-git
ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.16-Correct-check-for-.git.patch | 29 +
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3.spec |8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158431
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159047
Bug ID: 1159047
Summary: Please update to at least v1.300011
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-Email-Sender
Assignee: iarn...@gmail.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157490
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157810
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157487
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132321
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151572
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158379
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
Hello,
To be backward compatible the processing of 'moddn' aci should be
disabled by default. So 'add' permission will still allow to moddn
an entry under the target subtree.
New 'moddn' permission in aci will be supported (aci not rejected)
but not enforced during moddn.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47901
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47901/0001-Ticket-47901-After-total-init-nsds5replicaLastInitSt.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
- Original Message -
Hi,
I'm trying to update git-review to 1.24. With that version,
git-review uses pbr. I have no deeper knowledge of Python
packaging in Fedora and only tweaked the spec file so that
it works for me
(cf.
76 matches
Mail list logo