On 02/08/2016 02:13 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 08/02/16 08:27 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> python3 package to be split in several more subpackages:
>> * system-python-libs - a subset of standard Python library considered
>> essential to run "system tools" requiring Python
>> * system-python -
On 08/02/16 08:56 AM, Michele Baldessari wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:03:46PM -0500, Digimer wrote:
>> On 17/12/15 09:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> On 12/17/2015 05:27 PM, Digimer wrote:
I'll take co-maintainer to assist Alex as she comes up to speed. I
maintained the
hi
depend on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305015
regards
.g
Il 08/02/2016 16:51, Sandro Bonazzola ha scritto:
Hi, just received:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:46 PM, > wrote:
ebay-cors-filter's
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:37:40PM +0100, Šimon Lukašík wrote:
> Thing is just we have slightly different approach. Let me explain.
Using OpenSCAP sounds great. Mostly, I wanted to focus on results and
what the user sees rather than implementation details.
The advantages you describe sound
abrt should write the reason why it ignores crashes of Firefox to system
logs.
Jakub
On 02/03/2016 02:48 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 02/03/2016 02:45 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
On 02/03/2016 10:53 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Also please remove Firefox from ABRT blacklist at:
> It's part of what nss-myhostname provides. There's clearly no
> consensus on the "gateway" feature.
The belief of operating systems' programmers that a lack of a default
gateway must imply no network connectivity constricts useful network
designs.
My objection to the "gateway" name is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305212
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 02/08/2016 08:27 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> = Proposed Self Contained Change: System Python =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/System_Python
>
> Is this intended to mirror Debian's python-minimal?
>
> What steps
2016-02-08 16:56 GMT+01:00 Peter Robinson :
>
> Is there client side soname bumps which will need associated rebuilds
> for anything that depends on it?
redis does not provide any library or public API, clients use the wire
protocol which remains compatible.
No rebuilds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305312
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263
--- Comment #5 from Denis Fateyev ---
Ok, will do. Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Hi,
EPEL7 currently ship Redis 2.8.x branch, but it will be EOLed soon
after the 3.2.x branch will be released.
I plan to update EPEL7 branch to 3.0.x, there's no specific action
required from users for the migration.
Regards,
H.
___
epel-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294
--- Comment #4 from Denis Fateyev ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1)
> * You could drop the findutils builddep by substituting `-exec rm -f {} \;'
> with `-delete'.
I just keeping it for a while for package
Hi!
I have 4 R package that I submitted for review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333 R-highlight
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334 R-inline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305335 R-Rcpp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305336
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:31:12PM -, Raphael Groner wrote:
> You should not orphan packages in rawhide, not cause of "not used any more".
> Check upstream for activity and users. What about future security patches? To
> retire shorewall is obviously a bad idea.
That's quite the opposite,
On 02/08/2016 09:21 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 02/08/2016 08:27 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>>> = Proposed Self Contained Change: System Python =
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/System_Python
>>
>> Is this intended
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
dfateyev's scratch build of perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.24-2.fc23.denf.src.rpm for
rawhide completed
Hi, just received:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:46 PM, wrote:
> ebay-cors-filter's dependencies failed to resolve in f24
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/ebay-cors-filter
>
> --
> You received this message due to your preference settings at
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
dfateyev's scratch build of perl-Parse-Gitignore-0.02-2.fc23.denf.src.rpm for
rawhide completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
From a9b2624bd3d4817a281de842d0762637980df8fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:27:28 +0100
Subject: 2.2.1 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Git-CPAN-Patch.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3
8366d0f560f626aea8ebcdb68203d0e0 Git-CPAN-Patch-2.2.1.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Git-CPAN-Patch/Git-CPAN-Patch-2.2.1.tar.gz/md5/8366d0f560f626aea8ebcdb68203d0e0/Git-CPAN-Patch-2.2.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 7f5a34fa88c3ebfc838fd2128e5026c6ed560f60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:05:00 +0100
Subject: 1.30 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-XML-XPath.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305061
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 111853
---
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
232 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
214 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
208
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
This is an initial take on stuff that was discussed in person during Tim's
stay in Brno. Sending to the list for additional discussion/fine-tuning.
= What =
Talking rpmgrill-like checks, there will be a need to be able to facilitate
some kind of structure for representing that a check is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305061
--- Comment #2 from Sjoerd Mullender ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #1)
> (In reply to Sjoerd Mullender from comment #0)
> > Description of problem:
> > I don't know whether this bug is in bugzilla or perl-Encode,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305261
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304926
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata ---
* You could drop the findutils builddep by substituting `-exec rm -f {} \;'
with `-delete'.
* The actual required version of Test::More is 0.88 (as done_testing is
called).
That's
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> Upstream development is dead for years now and newer Origin
> files are not covered by these releases.
Would you happen to know the latest Origin version supported by liborigin?
--
devel mailing list
liborigin: Origin 7.5 (last release 2008)
liborigin2: Origin 8.1 (last release 2010)
On 02/08/2016 12:22 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
>> Upstream development is dead for years now and newer Origin
>> files are not
> Also can we ensure that gnome software/packagekit updates the dnf database
> correctly before we recommend, or even enable, this upgrade method?
> It's bad enough right now with F23 and dnf autoremoving stuff installed via
> the packagekit interfaces but add in a whole system upgrade being out
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata ---
* Missing builddeps: gcc, perl-devel
* I'm not sure $LDFLAGS contains anything; consider using %{?__global_ldflags}.
* Consider packaging the examples directory as %doc.
* Again, you
913cecb3acec52ae622d1b4d75b0be90 XML-XPath-1.30.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-XML-XPath/XML-XPath-1.30.tar.gz/md5/913cecb3acec52ae622d1b4d75b0be90/XML-XPath-1.30.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
841 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893
libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
606 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
455
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304910
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
Hi all,
I'm going to orphan liborigin and liborigin2 in Rawhide. Last liborigin
dependency was LabPlot, but this does not depend on liborigin with 2.x
releases available in Rawhide. Same for liborigin2 which was required by
scidavis. Upstream development is dead for years now and newer Origin
bf606eda81c9dc5347c1f3483732b2d2 CGI-4.26.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-CGI/CGI-4.26.tar.gz/md5/bf606eda81c9dc5347c1f3483732b2d2/CGI-4.26.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 9c53e2c5fbbc6daaece94b7ef3e826d0d05b4c83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:16:24 +0100
Subject: 4.26 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-CGI.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294
--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1)
> * You could drop the findutils builddep by substituting `-exec rm -f {} \;'
> with `-delete'.
Erm, coreutils, of course.
--
You are
From 38a1fa45073656951c05e907a97b8b5faa2045c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:19:23 +0100
Subject: 1.18 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Pod-Spell.spec | 11 +++
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 9
9ab791df81c26910f98a51c173121bd7 Pod-Spell-1.18.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Pod-Spell/Pod-Spell-1.18.tar.gz/md5/9ab791df81c26910f98a51c173121bd7/Pod-Spell-1.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
> During his DevConf presentation, Ian mentioned that he had to recompile a lot
> of the base packages to get it working, so I'm guessing not. His presentation
> should be on YouTube by now if you're interested.
You might also want to have a look at "Fedora 23 Remix for Pi 2B" [1]
by Vaughan.
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 09:11:49PM +0100, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Already added to our next grooming meeting.
Nice. Without realizing this discussion already happened here, I asked
Dennis the same question as Rich, about the status of the its
(virt-builder's) metadata distribution as part of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305266
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-Pod-Spell to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305315
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LetsEncrypt#Scope
Change owner(s):
* Nick Bebout
*James Hogarth
* Nick Le Mouton
The Let's Encrypt client is now packaged in Fedora. This will allow
Fedora users to easily install the
ppisar changed dfateyev's branch request for perl-Sereal-Encoder in epel7 from
Pending to Awaiting Review
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Sereal-Encoder/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
ppisar changed dfateyev's branch request for perl-Sereal-Decoder in epel7 from
Pending to Awaiting Review
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Sereal-Decoder/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47951
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47951/0001-Ticket-47951-
Add-PIDFile-option-to-.service.patch
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LetsEncrypt#Scope
Change owner(s):
* Nick Bebout
*James Hogarth
* Nick Le Mouton
The Let's Encrypt client is now packaged in Fedora. This will allow
Fedora users to easily install the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/08/2016 11:14 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have 4 R package that I submitted for review.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333 R-highlight
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334 R-inline
>
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LetsEncrypt#Scope
>
Why is this a proposed Change? Let's Encrypt was pushed out to *all*
currently supported
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305266
--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata ---
Not me personally. I suggest asking the primary maintainer, Petr Písař.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305261
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
5fc7b37e88bf2244ea79f946266e10f1 App-cpm-0.114.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-App-cpm/App-cpm-0.114.tar.gz/md5/5fc7b37e88bf2244ea79f946266e10f1/App-cpm-0.114.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
dfateyev's scratch build of perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.24-2.fc23.denf.src.rpm for
rawhide completed
From 11db2568645696f016bce44011fa0027624a5a89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:09:43 +0100
Subject: 0.114 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-App-cpm.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263
--- Comment #3 from Denis Fateyev ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1)
> * Missing builddeps: gcc, perl-devel
Added.
> * I'm not sure $LDFLAGS contains anything; consider using
> %{?__global_ldflags}.
In RHEL7
On 02/08/2016 03:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
At DevConf.cz, I said that 2016 needed to be the year of the _show_
part of "show & tell" for what we started with the "rings" proposal and
now what we're calling, vaguely, "modularity".
Some of that is scary, because anything really new always is.
On 02/08/2016 03:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
At DevConf.cz, I said that 2016 needed to be the year of the _show_
part of "show & tell" for what we started with the "rings" proposal and
now what we're calling, vaguely, "modularity".
Some of that is scary, because anything really new always is.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305186
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
> I have comments at the top of the spec file that explain the reason for
> the warning below. In addition, I have posted messages about this
> warning on this list; see
> project.org/thread/GI3L74J47OLRTYLQIMSEUA7SUZR5VLU7/#JUUSDFET2HBPUDIP3G7CPHB7Q7XCCLEG
>
> Should I just ignore the message
From ad62719614bc617c199f9602f80ef7b6323e5ed3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:42:08 +0100
Subject: 0.03 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru.spec | 16 +++-
sources |
From eebb9a8172eb116a1f97077869a716df9235d007 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:22:52 +0100
Subject: 0.34 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Business-CreditCard.spec | 11 +--
sources
From 29a85b1ef77987434fd72e87a7ad1fe8ee20113f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:21:48 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
---
perl-Business-CreditCard.spec | 5 -
1 file
From eebb9a8172eb116a1f97077869a716df9235d007 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:22:52 +0100
Subject: 0.34 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Business-CreditCard.spec | 11 +--
sources
From a1af5c47b743a0e4bb7c17e8f77e1431bcd3d20d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:14:55 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild
---
perl-Business-CreditCard.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
From 0c3630beaf59128d59abdbf2d5f15b410fb644d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 01:21:06 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
---
perl-Business-CreditCard.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4
You should not orphan packages in rawhide, not cause of "not used any more".
Check upstream for activity and users. What about future security patches? To
retire shorewall is obviously a bad idea.
I would be happy to see someone to take and continue shorewall maintainership,
at least in
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:03:46PM -0500, Digimer wrote:
> On 17/12/15 09:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 12/17/2015 05:27 PM, Digimer wrote:
> >> I'll take co-maintainer to assist Alex as she comes up to speed. I
> >> maintained the "cluster" package in Fedora up until it was retired in
> >>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305261
--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata ---
The same response as in bug 1305266 :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 09:38:28 +0100
Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi píše v Čt 04. 02. 2016 v 13:34 -0700:
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for these package maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305266
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
psabata set the monitor flag of perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
At DevConf.cz, I said that 2016 needed to be the year of the _show_
part of "show & tell" for what we started with the "rings" proposal and
now what we're calling, vaguely, "modularity".
Some of that is scary, because anything really new always is. It's
important that we do this in a way that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/08/2016 08:31 AM, Raphael Groner wrote:
> You should not orphan packages in rawhide, not cause of "not used any
> more". Check upstream for activity and users. What about future security
> patches? To retire shorewall is obviously a bad idea. I
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 05:52:05PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> At DevConf I understood that Pidora is dead and the people cannot be
> reached. However the new rebuild from Ian is already more awesome (it
> contains Ada and Haskell). However, we still need more people interested
> in helping there.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305266
--- Comment #2 from Denis Fateyev ---
Sorry, completely overlooked this package since for some reason checked its
presence in F23 and RHEL6+.
Anyway, could you provide f23, el6, and epel7 branches with it?
I could request
c43ab230c6afce287fdb53bcc8c8f700 Lingua-Stem-Ru-0.03.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru/Lingua-Stem-Ru-0.03.tar.gz/md5/c43ab230c6afce287fdb53bcc8c8f700/Lingua-Stem-Ru-0.03.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From ad62719614bc617c199f9602f80ef7b6323e5ed3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:42:08 +0100
Subject: 0.03 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru.spec | 16 +++-
sources |
From e930a36672b4521017d86621959201fbe5e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:00:32 +0100
Subject: Modernize spec file
---
perl-ExtUtils-H2PM.spec | 15 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> liborigin: Origin 7.5 (last release 2008)
> liborigin2: Origin 8.1 (last release 2010)
Hmm, I have a lot of colleagues using versions 7.5 and 8.0, so I am
tempted to take them.
--
devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305261
--- Comment #2 from Denis Fateyev ---
Sorry, the same issue as with RHBZ #1305266.
Could you provide epel7 branch with the package (supporting
perl-Sereal-Encoder, perl-Sereal-Decoder, etc. packages there, too), or you
On 02/08/2016 02:13 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
>> liborigin: Origin 7.5 (last release 2008)
>> liborigin2: Origin 8.1 (last release 2010)
> Hmm, I have a lot of colleagues using versions 7.5 and 8.0, so I am
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305186
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Business-CreditCard-0.34-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-129196dd6d
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305186
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Business-CreditCard-0.34-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-129196dd6d
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305347
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-App-cpm-0.114-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-68ce6230e9
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303363
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-App-cpm-0.114-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-68ce6230e9
--
You are receiving this mail
> > #2) Not sure how the rpmlint notification system is setup, but I
> > found it odd that I received notification of packages that passed.
> > Really why send those? Or is it something I can configure what type
> > of notification I would want?
>
> It seems there's only triggers on 'new result'
On 08/02/16 08:27 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
python3 package to be split in several more subpackages:
* system-python-libs - a subset of standard Python library considered
essential to run "system tools" requiring Python
* system-python - /usr/bin/system-python binary (interpreter) for the
tools to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305186
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
psabata's perl-Business-CreditCard-0.34-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=734160
--
You are receiving
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
3 packages were orphaned
idjc [f23, f22] was orphaned by sergiomb
DJ application for streaming audio
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/idjc
lemonpos
From de6a0f5bca348d68d625ddb468cc66f22987c874 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:42:08 +0100
Subject: 0.03 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Lingua-Stem-Ru.spec | 16 +++-
sources |
eb2c081c0ca36acae12138d6e84bf068 Business-CreditCard-0.34.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Business-CreditCard/Business-CreditCard-0.34.tar.gz/md5/eb2c081c0ca36acae12138d6e84bf068/Business-CreditCard-0.34.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo