63d470197a5923f63ecca31d1fea1e38 SQL-Shell-1.15.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-SQL-Shell/SQL-Shell-1.15.tar.gz/md5/63d470197a5923f63ecca31d1fea1e38/SQL-Shell-1.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
slaanesh changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on
perl-Log-Dispatch-Config (el6) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Log-Dispatch-Config/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 3cd36b64c130aec5e820ba43d9783361a53ea5b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:41:26 +0100
Subject: 1.3 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
RPM2-1.2-Fix-global-symbol-error.patch | 12
perl-RPM2.spec
4965c0836cc605d8cf66d598bf0c281a RPM2-1.3.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-RPM2/RPM2-1.3.tar.gz/md5/4965c0836cc605d8cf66d598bf0c281a/RPM2-1.3.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
slaanesh changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Log-Dispatch-Config (el6)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Log-Dispatch-Config/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
slaanesh changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Log-Dispatch-Config
(el6) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Log-Dispatch-Config/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
slaanesh changed owner of perl-Log-Dispatch-Config (el6) to 'ppisar'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Log-Dispatch-Config/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
slaanesh changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Log-Dispatch-Config
(el6) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Log-Dispatch-Config/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
psabata set the monitor flag of perl-Text-CSV_XS to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From 05d4177d8c2368fffb7f4798b88cf25925ed876b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:17:33 +0100
Subject: 1.32 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-XML-XPath.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+),
062fd4380b8d647b28d688ca1645c8d3 XML-XPath-1.32.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-XML-XPath/XML-XPath-1.32.tar.gz/md5/062fd4380b8d647b28d688ca1645c8d3/XML-XPath-1.32.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
ng closest to you, that would help. ;)
>
> # openQA
So here's the good news - releng did the first 24 Branched pungi4
compose, and it ran, and the openQA tests ran! Here's the bad news:
they all failed. :)
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora=24=Fedora-24-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
All,
I have built Xfce 4.12 packages for EL-7 on COPR. The link for the
repo is
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/xfce412-epel7/
I would appreciate it if people can install the packages and give it a
spin. Please report any
> "DJ" == Dave Johansen writes:
DJ> I think the confusion comes from the fact that for several releases
DJ> we heard "get ready because Python 3 is going to be the default" and
DJ> then all of the sudden that just stopped.
In that case, the issue is simply the
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 13:23 +0100, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
> I'm going to upgrade libcue. Unfortunately this requires a soname
> bump. Fortunately only recompilation is necessary.
It works better if you plan this a bit *ahead of time* and actually
plan for the rebuilds to happen, as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310327
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13118976
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311781
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13118978
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311785
Bug ID: 1311785
Summary: perl-version-0.9914 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-version
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311781
Bug ID: 1311781
Summary: perl-PDF-API2-2.026 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PDF-API2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311781
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1130387
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1130387=edit
[patch] Update to 2.026 (#1311781)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310327
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1130386
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1130386=edit
[patch] Update to 6.48 (#1310327)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310327
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
I got caught up trying to research a problem with NFS and iscsi and
completely missed that I was supposed to run a meeting today.
Thanks to the people who pinged me and my apologies. Since I am now a
month ahead, I would like to get all the issues that we are wanting
done in the next week meeting
On 29 January 2016 at 06:51, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few days ago, three CVEs for Nginx and were fixed in 1.8.1. Upstream
> only maintain 1.8.x and above, so they didn't release any fixes for
> older versions of Nginx. I was able to backport the relevant commits to
>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> > "SG" == Stephen Gallagher writes:
>
> SG> To supplement this, it's the default in the sense that packagers are
> SG> expected to ship python3 packages if they are supported upstream and
> "SG" == Stephen Gallagher writes:
SG> To supplement this, it's the default in the sense that packagers are
SG> expected to ship python3 packages if they are supported upstream and
SG> if the package includes the same binary executable name for py2 and
SG> py3, only the
Hi John,
This[0] is tutorial how to create custom policy RPM package.
[0]
http://lvrabec-selinux.rhcloud.com/2015/07/07/how-to-create-selinux-product-policy/
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Thank you.
On 02/24/2016 06:06 PM, John Florian wrote:
Is this[0] really the
On 02/24/2016 11:17 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
wrote:
Jóhann_B._Guðmundsson wrote:
Arguably the regression in 4.4 with drm/i915 that causes screen
flickering in dual monitor setups needs to be looked at before this gets
> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi writes:
TK> The easiest thing to do if you want a single spec file for EPEL7 and
TK> Fedora is to Requires: python-foo rather than python2-foo.
Except that FPC would like to move away from this. That's the entire
reason I've brought this up.
I plan to make this update on saturday, can anyone take care of the rebuilds?
2016-02-20 21:13 GMT+01:00 Sébastien Willmann :
> Hi,
>
> I’m planning to update jsoncpp in rawhide to version 1.6.5 in a week
> (when f24 is branched)
>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Honza Šilhan wrote:
> TL;DR
>
> Hawkey project [1] is being obsoleted, use libhif [2] instead. For hawkey
> Python API consumers,
> the transition should be painless.
>
>
> Why we have done that?
>
> Nowadays there are three major consumers
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> One annoying difference between packaging for Fedora and EPEL7 (and
> probably older) is the fact that Python packages in Fedora are required
> to provide "python2-foo" whereas many EL7 packages don't. This leads
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/02/16 17:08, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I no longer need these packages in Fedora (they were there to
> support Review Board which is now only in EPEL due to Django
> incompatibilities), so I've orphaned them.
>
> I will continue to maintain
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
>
>
> On 02/24/2016 05:22 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>
>> On 02/18/2016 05:51 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 4.4.2 is currently building and should be in updates-testing soon. As
>>> usual,
>>> please
On 24/02/16 13:41, Peter wrote:
> Maybe I missed something here.
I just realized I completely missed the point of this, never mind my
post above it's based on a complete mis-understanding.
Peter
___
epel-devel mailing list
> "P" == Peter writes:
P> I would be worried, though, that you'll have packages that were built
P> against python that are now trying to pull in and possibly run on
P> python2 unnecessarily, and possibly detrimentally if Red Hat suddenly
P> decides to push python2
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
248 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
231 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
225
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
wrote:
> Jóhann_B._Guðmundsson wrote:
>
>> Arguably the regression in 4.4 with drm/i915 that causes screen
>> flickering in dual monitor setups needs to be looked at before this gets
>> released since it will get
Hi,
libselinux upstream plans to disallow to use getpidcon(0, ) in sense of
getpidcon(getpid(), )
This behavior has never been documented and it's implementation is
considered error prone.
There seems to be no such case in Fedora but if your project uses
getpidcon() with pid == 0 to get the
Jóhann_B._Guðmundsson wrote:
> Arguably the regression in 4.4 with drm/i915 that causes screen
> flickering in dual monitor setups needs to be looked at before this gets
> released since it will get tiresome quite quickly for end users trying
> to do some work when suddenly one of the screen
Hi guys,
at the moment there is approximately 250 packages shipping projects
written in go. In general, each project has its own set of dependencies
and provided import paths (golang packages). As usually each package has
four active branches. Thus, we are dealing with approximately 1000 spec
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2016-02-25 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2016-02-25 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2016-02-25 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2016-02-25
On 02/24/2016 05:22 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 02/18/2016 05:51 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
4.4.2 is currently building and should be in updates-testing soon. As
usual,
please test and give karma appropriately (negative karma for new issues,
not existing issues).
Thanks,
Laura
A use
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
352 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
115 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
13
latest
compose against, we simply pick the compose for the same release from
the previous day. This doesn't work any more, because of how pungi4 has
'respins' and the respin identifier goes into the compose ID. When we
have 'Fedora-24-20160224.n.0' we don't know what to compare it to,
because we don'
On 02/24/2016 06:31 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Google found that message in:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl_rebuild/scratch/latest/packages/perl-version/build.log
dwz: ./usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/version/vxs/vxs.so.debug: Couldn't find
DIE referenced by DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105023
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
TL;DR
Hawkey project [1] is being obsoleted, use libhif [2] instead. For hawkey
Python API consumers,
the transition should be painless.
Why we have done that?
Nowadays there are three major consumers of hawkey - DNF, PackageKit and
rpm-ostree. The hawkey
API was not in final form yet and
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:59:29 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello,
> What $subject means ? , should I be worried ?
>
> Only happens in rawhide , I think is GCC6 warning.
Google found that message in:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl_rebuild/scratch/latest/packages/perl-version/build.log
Hi all,
We're at the last stages of preparing the first major owncloud update in a
while.
The current version of owncloud in Fedora is the fairly old stable 8.0
release (presently 8.0.10) which we want to bring back in line with the
current owncloud upstream release of 8.2.2.
Unfortunately it's
On 02/18/2016 05:51 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
4.4.2 is currently building and should be in updates-testing soon. As usual,
please test and give karma appropriately (negative karma for new issues,
not existing issues).
Thanks,
Laura
A use after free bug was found in the 4.4.2 release. Since
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 09:58 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>
>> On 02/24/2016 09:45 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/24/2016 09:30 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>
1) usually after the branch I build new packages
Is this[0] really the latest greatest documentation for doing this? Given that
it references FC5 it seems rather dated and I wouldn't expect something like
this to still be in Draft.
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux_Policy_Modules_Packaging_Draft
--
John Florian
--
devel mailing
Hello,
What $subject means ? , should I be worried ?
Only happens in rawhide , I think is GCC6 warning.
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105023
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:07:11 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> > After talking about the workboards in phabricator during the meeting
> > earlier today, I mentioned trying to figure out a way to have
> > workboards for more than just a single project.
> >
> > I've been futzing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/24/2016 10:41 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>>> Yeah, this is because the Samba and FreeIPA packages didn't quite
>>> finish their python 3 conversion in time. By F25, we should be able to
>>> avoid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105023
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I no longer need these packages in Fedora (they were there to support Review
Board which is now only in EPEL due to Django incompatibilities), so I've
orphaned them.
I will continue to maintain them on EPEL 7.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
On 02/24/2016 10:46 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 07:17 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 1) usually after the branch I build new packages for rawhide (i.e.
>> $branch+1). But atm in the master branch, a `fedpkg build` gives me
>>
>> Could not execute build: Package
On 02/24/2016 07:17 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1) usually after the branch I build new packages for rawhide (i.e.
> $branch+1). But atm in the master branch, a `fedpkg build` gives me
>
> Could not execute build: Package glusterfs-3.7.8-1.fc24 has already
> been built
>
> Am I
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> > Yeah, this is because the Samba and FreeIPA packages didn't quite finish
> > their python 3 conversion in time. By F25, we should be able to avoid
> > shipping python 2 in the default installation of Fedora Server.
>
> Except if you want to use
> Yeah, this is because the Samba and FreeIPA packages didn't quite finish
> their python 3 conversion in time. By F25, we should be able to avoid
> shipping python 2 in the default installation of Fedora Server.
Except if you want to use ansible to managed that, although in theory
support for
On 02/24/2016 09:58 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 02/24/2016 09:45 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 02/24/2016 09:30 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
1) usually after the branch I build new packages for rawhide (i.e.
$branch+1). But atm in the master branch, a `fedpkg build` gives me
Could
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1) usually after the branch I build new packages for rawhide (i.e.
> $branch+1). But atm in the master branch, a `fedpkg build` gives me
>
> Could not execute build: Package glusterfs-3.7.8-1.fc24 has
On 02/24/2016 09:45 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 09:30 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> 1) usually after the branch I build new packages for rawhide (i.e.
>>> $branch+1). But atm in the master branch, a `fedpkg build` gives me
>>>
>>> Could not execute build: Package
On 02/24/2016 09:30 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
1) usually after the branch I build new packages for rawhide (i.e.
$branch+1). But atm in the master branch, a `fedpkg build` gives me
Could not execute build: Package glusterfs-3.7.8-1.fc24 has already
been built
Am I just too early? Or is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311346
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
> 1) usually after the branch I build new packages for rawhide (i.e.
> $branch+1). But atm in the master branch, a `fedpkg build` gives me
>
> Could not execute build: Package glusterfs-3.7.8-1.fc24 has already
> been built
>
> Am I just too early? Or is there something missing that's
Hi,
1) usually after the branch I build new packages for rawhide (i.e.
$branch+1). But atm in the master branch, a `fedpkg build` gives me
Could not execute build: Package glusterfs-3.7.8-1.fc24 has already
been built
Am I just too early? Or is there something missing that's preventing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311343
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-SQL-Shell-1.15-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4fcabab9fc
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311343
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-SQL-Shell-1.15-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-48bfc3c3b9
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311343
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
Hello All!
That would be great!
2016-02-24 13:24 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko :
> I can take care about rebuilds.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016, 1:23 PM Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>>
>> Hello All!
>> I'm going to upgrade libcue. Unfortunately this requires a
I can take care about rebuilds.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016, 1:23 PM Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
> I'm going to upgrade libcue. Unfortunately this requires a soname
> bump. Fortunately only recompilation is necessary.
>
> --
> With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
> --
> devel
Hello All!
I'm going to upgrade libcue. Unfortunately this requires a soname
bump. Fortunately only recompilation is necessary.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311090
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311345
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309199
Honza Horak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
79 matches
Mail list logo