pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-WebService-Rajce
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-WebService-Rajce/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-WebService-Linode
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-WebService-Linode/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
psabata set the monitor flag of perl-MCE to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2016-731cf6f00b
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/73396736-e5c5-11e5-b4e1-525400120b80/task_output/FEDORA-2016-731cf6f00b.log
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
upgradepath PASSED for perl-Starlet-0.29-1.fc22
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/73396736-e5c5-11e5-b4e1-525400120b80/task_output/perl-Starlet-0.29-1.fc22.log
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Le 26/02/2016 10:47, Carlos O'Donell a écrit :
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf.
I may understand the need.
But what
perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From e072af1bc0a85cae702174668ed3573c61b7c81b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 22:18:57 -0600
Subject: 2.210
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Email-Simple.spec | 24 +++-
sources| 2 +-
3 files
From e072af1bc0a85cae702174668ed3573c61b7c81b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 22:18:57 -0600
Subject: 2.210
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Email-Simple.spec | 24 +++-
sources| 2 +-
3 files
062fbe3dd8bc6ea7cdebfd7eea7728cc Email-Simple-2.210.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Email-Simple/Email-Simple-2.210.tar.gz/md5/062fbe3dd8bc6ea7cdebfd7eea7728cc/Email-Simple-2.210.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48665
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48665/0001-Ticket-48665-Prevent-se
fault-in-ldbm_instance_modify.patch
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
upgradepath PASSED for perl-Starlet-0.29-1.fc23
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/8a665682-e59b-11e5-b4e1-525400120b80/task_output/perl-Starlet-0.29-1.fc23.log
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2016-6ed4053bb3
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/8a665682-e59b-11e5-b4e1-525400120b80/task_output/FEDORA-2016-6ed4053bb3.log
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
I'm looking for reviewers for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315910
python-libarchive-c - Python interface to libarchive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315912
diffoscope - In-depth comparison of files, archives, and directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315909
Bug ID: 1315909
Summary: perl-XML-XPath-1.34 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-XPath
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315524
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315904
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1134354
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1134354=edit
Log
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315904
Bug ID: 1315904
Summary: perl-MCE-1.700 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MCE
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: psab...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315905
Bug ID: 1315905
Summary: perl-MongoDB-v1.2.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MongoDB
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315904
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315904
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1134353
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1134353=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315904
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Rebase helper failed.
See logs and attachments in this bugzilla
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315904
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-MCE and version 1.608 FAILED.
See for details
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48757
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48757/0001-Ticket-48757-License-tag-does-not-match-actual-licen.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@%(host_name)s
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
upgradepath FAILED for FEDORA-2016-6ed4053bb3
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/03580b16-e57a-11e5-8f38-525400120b80/task_output/FEDORA-2016-6ed4053bb3.log
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
upgradepath FAILED for perl-Starlet-0.29-1.fc23
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/03580b16-e57a-11e5-8f38-525400120b80/task_output/perl-Starlet-0.29-1.fc23.log
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
upgradepath FAILED for perl-Starlet-0.29-1.fc22
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/eae56b34-e577-11e5-b4e1-525400120b80/task_output/perl-Starlet-0.29-1.fc22.log
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
upgradepath FAILED for FEDORA-2016-731cf6f00b
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/eae56b34-e577-11e5-b4e1-525400120b80/task_output/FEDORA-2016-731cf6f00b.log
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 14:23 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> So splitting out networkd would be possible, but it's smallish (<1MB)
> and doesn't bring in extra deps.
It would, however, allow us to finally solve all incarnations of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313085
Missing expected images:
Cloud raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Cloud raw-xz x86_64
No images in this compose but not 24-20160307.n.0
Images in 24-20160307.n.0 but not this:
Cloud docker x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 61 of 78
ID: 8127Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso default_install
URL:
Hi folks! Time for a first F24 Alpha blocker bug status mail.
tl;dr work summary
--
QA folks:
* help figure out what's going on in #1315541
* ensure all Alpha validation tests are covered with recent composes
anaconda devs:
* review/merge
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:42:31PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Sure, but you should use the Fedora Java Development List java-devel@
> > lists.fedoraproject.org
> > regards
> I was kinda hoping I wouldn't have to subscribe to another mailing list
> for this one question :D
Note that with
Missing expected images:
Cloud raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Cloud raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
No images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160307.n.0
No images in Rawhide-20160307.n.0 but not this.
No openQA tests found for compose.
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 19:48 +0100, gil wrote:
> i uploaded a patch for resolve the problem some time ago
> why you don't want use it?
OH! RIGHT! I missed that completely, some how! Sorry about that! Too
many FTBFS bugs today I guess.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
Il 08/03/2016 19:42, Ankur Sinha ha scritto:
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 18:55 +0100, gil wrote:
Sure, but you should use the Fedora Java Development List java-devel@
lists.fedoraproject.org
regards
I was kinda hoping I wouldn't have to subscribe to another mailing list
for this one question :D
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 18:55 +0100, gil wrote:
> Sure, but you should use the Fedora Java Development List java-devel@
> lists.fedoraproject.org
> regards
I was kinda hoping I wouldn't have to subscribe to another mailing list
for this one question :D
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
Sure, but you should use the Fedora Java Development List
java-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
regards
.g
Il 08/03/2016 18:17, Ankur Sinha ha scritto:
Hiya,
Could someone with more knowledge of Java please help with this bug? If
it's because the package is outdated, I'll just retire it.
This removal has been problematic for a lot of software including the listed
EPEL dependencies and anything those depend on. I propose the following be done:
- Temporarily un-retire Django14 in EPEL6, and allow a planned sunset after
some period of time. It would not receive updates during this
Agenda:
---
1. Roll Call
2. Outstanding Issues
a. Django removed from EL6
b. Orphans and removals
c. EL-5/EL-6 build root changes via tibbs
d. ???
3. Upcoming opportunities
a. Recharter EPEL
b. Removing EL-5 in 1 year
c. Discuss proposed plans.
d. Allowing CentOS to "build" a
Hiya,
Could someone with more knowledge of Java please help with this bug? If
it's because the package is outdated, I'll just retire it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307287
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 17:54 +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Yes. This makes it work. Thanks a lot.
Then it was probably broken by this update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606ca05253
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From a6be8dcb54a9f56db4eb0ae10da144e5c53f7608 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 17:59:31 +0100
Subject: Initial import
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler.spec | 55
From 4036e7be57abaf00f174fdc1e72fcae392ad94fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 17:59:31 +0100
Subject: Initial import
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler.spec | 55
Hi all,
Today's an important day on the Fedora 24 schedule[1], with several
significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point
[2]. That means that from now all Fedora 24 packages must be submitted
to updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they
will be
Hi all,
Today's an important day on the Fedora 24 schedule[1], with several
significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point
[2]. That means that from now all Fedora 24 packages must be submitted
to updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they
will be
3e455aec77a21d2e2ef0b52b3d561c79 ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.012.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.012.tar.gz/md5/3e455aec77a21d2e2ef0b52b3d561c79/ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.012.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:25:05PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Anyone has any suggestion?
>
> Does setting LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1 help?
Yes. This makes it work. Thanks a lot.
Later, Juan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on
perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler (f24) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler
(f24) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on
perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler (f24) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler
(f24) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler
(f24) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik changed psabata's 'approveacls' permission on
perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler (f24) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on
perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler (master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik set the koschei monitoring flag of perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
jplesnik changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler
(master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik changed psabata's 'approveacls' permission on
perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler (master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler
(master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on
perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler (master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler
(master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On 03/08/2016 09:05 AM, Jun Aruga wrote:
> Hi, Fedora developers!
>
> My name is Jun Aruga.
> I live in Brno, Czech Republic, working in Red Hat.
>
> I mainly have lived in open source world over than 10 years.
> I worked as a Software Engineer in Japan for a long time, and in Singapore
> for 3
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:25:05PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Anyone has any suggestion?
Does setting LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1 help?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
On 03/08/2016 09:05 AM, Jun Aruga wrote:
> Hi, Fedora developers!
>
> My name is Jun Aruga.
> I live in Brno, Czech Republic, working in Red Hat.
>
> I mainly have lived in open source world over than 10 years.
> I worked as a Software Engineer in Japan for a long time, and in Singapore
> for 3
Hi
since last Monday or so, I have been able to run firefox over ssh
anymore. I thought it was my setup, but further investigation showed
that it is something specific to firefox.
My setup is a bit more convoluted than this, but I am able to do:
$ ssh -X localhost gnome-terminal
And it shows
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mo, 2016-03-07 at 15:56 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > > Does this mean we can install systemd into a base container without
> > > systemd-udev?
>
Hi, Fedora developers!
My name is Jun Aruga.
I live in Brno, Czech Republic, working in Red Hat.
I mainly have lived in open source world over than 10 years.
I worked as a Software Engineer in Japan for a long time, and in Singapore for
3 years.
Now I am preparing my first Fedora package for
On 03/08/2016 12:20 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hello ,
Packages not signed in F24 are breaking copr builds , but I need copr
to test packages for F24 ...
What should we do ? to workaround this problem.
Thanks,
Wait for tomorrow. The packages should be signed starting today, as it
is the bodhi
perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi
Hi Remi
>
> I'm upgrading libsodium from 1.0.5 (soname 13) to 1.0.8 (soname 18)
>
> I will also rebuild dependent packages:
>
> - fastd
> - usbguard
> - zeromq
I'll rebuild dnsdist which also depends on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314800
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
The failure is caused by updated perltidy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315521
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13273329
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315029
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13273299
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315521
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315521
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1134120
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1134120=edit
[patch] Update to 1.22 (#1315521)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315029
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1134117
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1134117=edit
[patch] Update to 1.203 (#1315029)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315029
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Dear Perl hackers,
due to a shift in my work responsibilities, I'm giving away a
large number of my packages. If you're interested in any of
them, let me know and I'll pass them to you. See the list at
the end of this mail.
I'm going to orphan what's left & post to devel@ on Friday.
Thank
Hi team!
Please, review the urgent patch.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48751
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48751/0001-Ticket-48751-Clean-up-_constants.py-after-previous-p.patch
Thanks,
Simon
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 10:43:45AM +1000, William Brown wrote:
>
perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Hello ,
Packages not signed in F24 are breaking copr builds , but I need copr
to test packages for F24 ...
What should we do ? to workaround this problem.
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-MIME-Types.git/commit/?h=perl-MIME-Types-2.13-1.fc25=64a8fd5939eaa4c0a3be64ca10a246e1c714175d
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 64a8fd5939eaa4c0a3be64ca10a246e1c714175d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:41:36 +
Subject: Update to 2.13
- New upstream release 2.13
- Not all information was extracted from the Apache tables
- Simplify find command using -delete
eseyman set the monitor flag of perl-JSON-XS to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
eseyman set the monitor flag of perl-FCGI to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From 64a8fd5939eaa4c0a3be64ca10a246e1c714175d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:41:36 +
Subject: Update to 2.13
- New upstream release 2.13
- Not all information was extracted from the Apache tables
- Simplify find command using -delete
From 64a8fd5939eaa4c0a3be64ca10a246e1c714175d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:41:36 +
Subject: Update to 2.13
- New upstream release 2.13
- Not all information was extracted from the Apache tables
- Simplify find command using -delete
Thank you all, I know F24 isn't stable, I'm installing it to try to help
tracking bugs.
Kind regards,
Gregorio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
f2892ae9e6ea660a58746699c3924817 MIME-Types-2.13.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-MIME-Types/MIME-Types-2.13.tar.gz/md5/f2892ae9e6ea660a58746699c3924817/MIME-Types-2.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Gregorio . wrote:
> I'm new and I'm not an expert. I've Fedora 23 and I tried to upgrade my
> system to Fedora 24.
>
> I used the following command: # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever 24
>
> After this command the system downloads a lot of packages, but there is an
>
On Mo, 2016-03-07 at 15:56 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > Does this mean we can install systemd into a base container without
> > systemd-udev?
> > And without systemd-container?
> Yep. That's more or less the point
On 8 Mar 2016 08:26, "Gregorio ." wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm new and I'm not an expert. I've Fedora 23 and I tried to upgrade my
system to Fedora 24.
>
I suspect you're not aware of this, being new to Fedora, but Fedora 24
isn't released yet, and is still under development.
Hello,
I'm new and I'm not an expert. I've Fedora 23 and I tried to upgrade my system
to Fedora 24.
I used the following command: # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever 24
After this command the system downloads a lot of packages, but there is an
error:
Error: Package
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-eperl to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
96 matches
Mail list logo